Some questions


1. Was the whole apocalypse thing a dream? The world was returned to normal after Alexander woke. Also, Maria seemed to not understand why Alexander was bowing to her in the house fire scene.

2. What were the black and white 'dream' sequences about? The curtain falling from the window. Alexander pulling cloth out of the ground. The arial shot of the wrecked car and debris, and later of the same scene with a crowd of people.

3. Why did Alexander set fire to the house? He'd made a pact to give up all of his things, but why destroy the house and deprive his family too?

4. Were the ambulance men taking him away 'cause he was insane? If so, how did they get there so fast and why the Benny Hill chase?

5. Why did the son start talking at the end? What had happened that would cause his silence to stop?

How do you like them apples?

reply

Also: what did Alexander sacrifice (if anything) after all? Sleeping with Maria? If that was it, then what was the symbolism behind making love with her? (I guess it would have something to do with his mother or the motherly care and sympathy in general?)

But toms-email-1, mind you, most of these questions were meant not to have clearcut answers. As someone suggested somewhere in the comments, take a look at this page: http://www.acs.ucalgary.ca/~tstronds/nostalghia.com/TheTopics/Symbols.html.

A short citation from there:
"I am constantly being asked what this or that means in my films. It's unbearable! ... I don't know what my symbols mean. I only desire to induce feelings, any feelings, in viewers. ... My images do not signify anything beyond what they are... We do not know ourselves that well: sometimes we express forces which cannot be grasped by any ordinary measure."



reply

My opinions..(may be spoilers)

1. Was the whole apocalypse thing a dream? The world was returned to normal after Alexander woke. Also, Maria seemed to not understand why Alexander was bowing to her in the house fire scene.
-I don't think it was a dream or anything. If it was, how could Alexander not have known it and then set his house on fire thinking it was real? In the house eburning scene, I think i notice Alexander limpiing, because of the fall he took while riding the bike to Maria's; this might prove that the whole film happened. I'd be interested to hear arguments for the dream theory, because i wouldn't rule it out. It seems to me that some seens don't quite fit.. such as Alexander not being present for the first sings of war, we see him next talking quietly to Maria. I am thinking now that it might not matter, at least to Alexander, if it was a dream or not. It effected him either way. How about this.. if you think it was a dream: The act of waking up from the dream was the mericle of God, the saving of his family. The end is the same in any way, he had to pay for everything being restored to how it was. Does it really matter that the danger was real? It could have been. In reality, men should praise God every singles day for what they have. But only whe Alexander was faced with losing everything, somehting that he perhaps handn't ever felt did he finaly appreciate it and brought himself to make God the Sacrifice. wow, good question, i never even thought about it being a dream before.

2. What were the black and white 'dream' sequences about? The curtain falling from the window. Alexander pulling cloth out of the ground. The arial shot of the wrecked car and debris, and later of the same scene with a crowd of people.
-I think the wreckege scenes with the flipped car were shots of chaos caused by the outbrake of the new war. The shots of the room with the curtain i believe is Little Man's room and bed; probably a peaceful image simply meant to show how tranquil life can be and what means most to Alexander.

3. Why did Alexander set fire to the house? He'd made a pact to give up all of his things, but why destroy the house and deprive his family too?
-As good a question as why does Andrei in Nastalghia carry the candle across the pool. I see it as a sign of faith. He owed God what he proised. Why do this to his family, though? I think he must have thought that burning their house is a million times better than them and the whole world dying and humanity being wiped of the face of earth. Houses can be rebuilt, and as we see in the last shot, Little Man is alone by his tree again, which makes me think that the family still resides there, either they rebuilt their house or bought a new one. This is what to me makes the film genious, the amount of faith Alexander had to go through with his promise.

4. Were the ambulance men taking him away 'cause he was insane? If so, how did they get there so fast and why the Benny Hill chase?
- IMO, the family must have seen the house on firefrom far away, even before we see them running to Alexander. Otto and Maria are also around in this scene, so one of them could have called the meds. I don't think it matters that much though. The chase was prolly cuz Alexander was distressed by having to leave his family and knowing people would believe he was out of his mind from then on.

5. Why did the son start talking at the end? What had happened that would cause his silence to stop?
-At first i thought that the last few shots take place days or weeks after the house burning scene, but watching it again i see now that it is the continuation of it.. Maria follows, or rather cuts off the car which drives right by Little Man. So this makes me think that he didn't got the operation that the family was talking about in the begining. Plus the two sentences he does say, to me, are very profoud, and ends the film perfectly. The son gets his voice back right after the car drives by with his father, so it's kind of ironic. Alexander say to God that he will become a mute and give u everythign that binds him to this world.. perhaps because of this his son can talk. To me it's a very positive sign, kinda like God appreciating Alexander keeping his deal so he threw in something extra, giving his son voice again even without the surgery.

I just saw this film once, but as i was writing this i kept looking over certain scenes. To me this film is about faith, believing in somthing we can't see, and duh.. sacrifices, thinking not of ourselves but others, and appreciating what we do have.

reply

1. Was the whole apocalypse thing a dream? The world was returned to normal after Alexander woke.
-I don't think it was a dream or anything. If it was, how could Alexander not have known it and then set his house on fire thinking it was real?


I do think it was his imagination, dream or otherwise. The fact that the ambulance comes to take Alexander to a mental asylum indicates that he could no longer differentiate between reality and imagination.

2. What were the black and white 'dream' sequences about? The curtain falling from the window. Alexander pulling cloth out of the ground. The arial shot of the wrecked car and debris, and later of the same scene with a crowd of people.


My opinion is that the two sequences with arial shots of the wrecked car mark the beginning and the end of the subjective part of the film that reflects Alexander's imagination. The first one starts immediately after he passes out. Note that both sequences have a tracking shot that ends with a reflection of a city in a mirror. This, and much more in Offret, is an hommage to Ingmar Bergman's film Sasom i en spegel, "Through a Glass Darkly", but more literally "As in a mirror", the bible quote that refers to man's perspective on reality being distorted through his limited senses (see the other thread for more info). The chaotic crowd of people could symbolise the confusion occurring when the boundaries between imagination and reality are blurred, for instance on waking up.

3. Why did Alexander set fire to the house? He'd made a pact to give up all of his things, but why destroy the house and deprive his family too?


More important than the physical house for sheltering him and his family, the house symbolises the natural order for mere mortals, in other words: his sanity. That sanity is the sacrifice to which the film's title refers. He sacrifices his sanity in order to experience God directly.

4. Were the ambulance men taking him away 'cause he was insane? If so, how did they get there so fast...
- IMO, the family must have seen the house on fire from far away, even before we see them running to Alexander.


They were walking out in the countryside. Presuming they found a house with a phone somewhere, you'd think they call the fire brigade and not an ambulance from the mental asylum. Unless it was already obvious that he was insane, as hinted in the way Adelaide and Victor talk about Alexander when we are first introduced to them: "How has he been lately? All right?". This then suggests the possibility that Alexander set fire to the house in reaction to knowing he going to be committed to an asylum. And/or the possibility that Victor and Adelaide conspired to have him committed in order to get him out of the way because they were having an affair. Victor, being a doctor, would know the right procedures for doing so. Note that Victor mentions to Adelaide how good she is at scheming.

reply