MovieChat Forums > The Name of the Rose (1986) Discussion > Why didn't Adso take the girl with him a...

Why didn't Adso take the girl with him at the end?


He seems to hesitate quite a bit and is clearly inclined to have a female companion in his life. That is, it is clear that he's not becoming a monk in order to shield himself from his sexuality, but rather because his father wishes it. After his experience at this abbey and seeing all of these sick wretched monks you'd think he'd want out of that lifestyle, to live a normal life and have a family. Of course he doesn't know this girl at all, he's only just had tender moments and a sexual encounter with her, but you'd think his pity for her alone would want to make him "save" her, no? For the sake of not having a hollywood ending I am glad that he does ride away, but still it's puzzling including how he says he never regretted it.

This movie is a masterpiece!

reply

i just saw this movie again last night (april 15, 2008), and have seen it several times in the past. I think what i like the best is the atmosphere, the sense of place and history that allows us to immerse ourselves in for a couple of hours. As to the question as to why he doesn't stay with her, well,
if he had, i for one would have been disappointed. It would seem like a typical Hollywood ending for a movie..boy meets girl, boy gets girl. Seems much more realistic that he stays with his master, whom he adores and has so much confidence and love for. Yes, he does express his 'love' for her when he talks to the master that one night, but it just isn't enough to give up his life for her.

of course, the ending dialogue where he says even as an old, old man, he still thinks of her, that is so reminiscent of other films, primiarly "Citizen Kane" and rosebud, where this great man thinks of his sled at the end of his life. I think the films are making a point, and that is ,,,,what will we be thinking about at the end of ourlives? what has meant the most to us all of these years? It makes one want to start thinking now about what is the important thing,,,person, event, etc. inone's life now, and begin to appreciate it and live for it.

reply

Um, because it's the 14 century, and he's a fricking monk. People have obligations in the real world.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I personally find that closing sequence -- where he pauses on his mule and she looks up at him, both of them longing for a future that neither of them can have, and then he submits and rides on -- achingly sad and poignant.
by puirt-a-beul (Tue Apr 22 2008 11:13:20)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This girl would have been smelly and ignorant (and probably diseased many times over) with maybe 5 years to live. She certainly would not have perfectly moisturized, flawless skin, except for a few cutesy smudges applied in a Make-Up trailer. She would not have been the delicate supermodel serf who makes tender, gentle love (like she's been socialized via 20th century values) that the movie felt compelled to show us. She's one of the movie's more ridiculous, conventional ideas superimposed from our own era.

reply

There was no way that Adso would have been able to take her with him even if he wanted to, and it is highly unlikely that he would have wanted to. In the dark ages there were the clerics, the nobles, the soldiers both employed, and everybody else. If you weren't a noble, couldn't fight and were unable to join a monastic order you were *beep* out of luck. He also would have had obligations that would have made any kind of relationship impossible even if she could speak the same language.

This girl would have been smelly and ignorant (and probably diseased many times over) with maybe 5 years to live. She certainly would not have perfectly moisturized, flawless skin, except for a few cutesy smudges applied in a Make-Up trailer. She would not have been the delicate supermodel serf who makes tender, gentle love (like she's been socialized via 20th century values) that the movie felt compelled to show us. She's one of the movie's more ridiculous, conventional ideas superimposed from our own era.


That's always bothered me too. Valentina Vargas has an amazing, wonderful ass but it had absolutely no place in this film & creates a huge continuity error. She also has a suntan. And at 22 (Ms. Vargas' age) she had actually out-lived the life expectancy of a peasant for the era in which the film is set. Her character is completely preposterous. She should have been a snaggle toothed, greasy haired, unwashed, clodhopper with mud up to her armpits, lice galore, some sort of a skin disease & probably syphilis, a bad case of The Itch, and six to eleven children in tow, making her somewhat less than a tight, hot screw. You would want to bathe yourself in rubbing alcohol and set your member afire for a half minute to kill the bacteria after intimate contact with such a creature. Even then you would have a 15% chance of walking away from the encounter with leprosy from contact with any open sores on her dermis.

But she does have a great ass. Better than anything I got when I was 15 at any rate.

reply

And at 22 (Ms. Vargas' age) she had actually out-lived the life expectancy of a peasant for the era

Average life expectancy was low but individual life expectancy was often quite regular. Many people died at birth and during early childhood. But others survived and then founded a family with many children. There are still places on earth where people live in extreme poverty and have a low life expectancy.

reply

Brilliant post. I literally laughed out loud at your description of her. Thank you - I needed a good laugh this evening!

reply

She should have been a snaggle toothed, greasy haired, unwashed, clodhopper with mud up to her armpits, lice galore, some sort of a skin disease & probably syphilis, a bad case of The Itch, and six to eleven children in tow, making her somewhat less than a tight, hot screw. You would want to bathe yourself in rubbing alcohol and set your member afire for a half minute to kill the bacteria after intimate contact with such a creature. Even then you would have a 15% chance of walking away from the encounter with leprosy from contact with any open sores on her dermis.


Sounds like my first blind date.

reply

He could always quit the order since he had a rich family. The girl looks good because she's a hooker. If you look like an ancient pagan's mother figurine you ain't getting a whole chicken or the friar.

reply

I love the book. I "like" the movie.
The sex scene seems completely wrong to me though. The girl is too beautiful but at the same time too dirty, raggedy and aggressive in her sexual encounter with Adso.
And she's no hooker, she gives herself to the monks out of hunger and desperation (probably encouraged by her own family) to bring home something decent to eat.
In the book she is obviously relieved that for once she is going to have sex with someone younger and better looking than the old fat monk she usually meets, and that makes her a little more eager, but let's not forget that she is a poor peasant girl in constant awe of those rich and learned monks.

The final scene should not have take place at all. In the book the girl burns at the stake, along with the two condemned monks, period.
Stupid useless fake ending.

reply

He could always quit the order since he had a rich family.
Basically, the way things worked back then was that the 1st son would inherit the Dukedom, the 2nd would join the King's military, and the 3rd would join the Holy Orders. Adso, being the 3rd son, was obligated to join; had he arrived at Daddy's house with a wife, Daddy would say, "Congratulations, lotsa luck, and don't let the door hit you on the @$$ on your way out."


~~Bayowolf
There's a difference between being frank... and being dick.

reply

Interesting thoughts, teal123.

Remember, that Adso was described as "the youngest son of the Baron of Melk". His brother(s) would have claimed whatever inheritance there was to have, and any lands and of course the title; Adso had no choice but to follow the path most youngest sons of nobility did throughout much of European history: to go into one of the religious orders.

In a sense, Adso was as trapped in his life, and without options, as the girl was. (Although his life would have been a darned sight easier to live, and much more secure and comfortable !) The choice to take her with him wasn't his to make.

I personally find that closing sequence -- where he pauses on his mule and she looks up at him, both of them longing for a future that neither of them can have, and then he submits and rides on -- achingly sad and poignant.


You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment.

reply

Very insightful puirt-a-beul, putting it in context like that makes a lot of sense.

reply

In all honesty I would have done exaxtly what Adso did. Better to live a quiet, mature and sophisticated life as a monk than in an ugly, unclean and deranged enviornment that the girl had the misfortune to be trapped in.
_______
"What I want to know is how we're going to stay alive this winter."

reply

I don't think Adso was trapped at all. Even at such a young age he was a very well educated man by the standards of the time, so he would have had no problem earning a comfortable living for himself and the girl. But there's one factor that no one has considered, Adso had a true vocation to the religious life which swept all other considerations before it. For a devout Catholic like Adso, this calling is so real as to be almost tangible and is the defining force in his life. To resist it will bring him nothing but frustration and pain. He himself says that he has never regretted his choice, but that doesn't mean that he has no feelings for the girl or as time passes long for her and the life they could have had together. But he made his decision and it proves to be the right one for him.

reply

Yes, but his education in Classic Greek and Latin would do very little good in a world before the industrial revolution. What would he do for a living? He is living before Gutenburg's printing press, so scholarship outside the church is unlikely. He has no medical training and the real doctors at the time were barbers. If he was to try to live outside the monastery with that girl, he would have to become an apprendtice and learn a trade.

reply

The most obvious area that Adso would have worked in if he left the Church would have been the Law. In the 1320's legal systems that would be recognisable to us had already been established in most European countries and the struggle to make all from serf to monarch accountable under the law had already begun. Similarly sophisticated banking systems were in operation with the Hansiatic league in prominence in northern Europe and the Peruzzi bank among others in Italy so this is also a possibility.

An education in the classical Latin at that time would have been standard for a gentleman, but Adso's exposure to both traditional theology and the new "humanities" (especially his ability to understand Greek) through Brother William would have been a considerable asset. In the decades before the Black Death in the 1340's the first steps on the path that would later become the Renaissance had already been taken and many noblemen and prosperous merchants had begun building their own libraries and collecting antiquities. Adso's high birth and education would have made him a prized catch as the keeper of a private collection and tutor of the family children for any such wealthy individual.

reply

I don't think it's not because Adso had no options he turned away. That would have made the ending a no-brainer and it would not have stuck with us. In the end, Adso is posed with a genuine dilemma, like the ones life loves to throw at us all. That's why we remember this ending so well, and why it haunts some of us.

I think Adso made the right choice. His love for his mentor was greater than that of the girl, and like he says himself, that was his reason for making the choice he did: His mentor taught him many things that were wise, and true and good. You don't throw something like that away, just for a fling with a peasant girl.

His only regret in old-age hindsight, is that he could not have it all. We know this feeling. It hasn't ruined him, but the sweet fantasy of a life where he could have done everything at once, surely plays in his mind. And because he never got to know the girl, she remained perfect in his mind - an icon of the imagined joys he denied himself, in place of responsibility. There in lies the poetry of the ending, as I see it.

reply

I agree with Horus. While it is true that the lad would have had to struggle to survive if he stayed with the girl, that probably wasn't something that he was aware of in his education thus far. These peasants were as alien to him as beings from another planet, and while the girl probably wasn't the supermodel of the film, she probably did appear that way to the lad.

I think the point of this great scene is that the lad bases his decision upon whether he wants to have a human family life with sex, love, along with hardships that come with living a life; or whether he wants to learn under a very astute monk in order to help make improvements, be it in administration, Science, law, to make the lives of such peasants more bearable in the future.

Or, as Spock would say "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few".

I think that was the point of the scene, at any rate.


How do we know it's not a fake? It looks like a fake to me.

reply

[deleted]

Isn't it obvious? Adso is a monk and he has to live a life of chastity, even if he strayed in the kitchen. The mind is willing but the flesh is weak!

reply

The one reason everyone has overlooked?

THAT'S THE WAY THE BOOK ENDS.

Umberto Eco would probably not have allowed an adaptation that would have made such a huge change.

It's a difficult book, but well worth the effort. In one of the special features on the disc I just watched, it is revealed that Eco, who had described the labyrinth as being on one level, had a major "aha!" moment when he saw the plans for the film set.

"If I'm going to wear a dress, I want something with some slink." - Zoe, Firefly

reply

He´s bisexual, and he prefers men

reply

The freedom of choice we enjoy today did not exist then. Social mobility was very scarce and lets not forget the vow of a monk to be celibate. He sinned in sleeping with her and was tempted by her in the ways that the order he is dedicated to warn against. Lets not forget the very very uptight point of view on sex and what not. To marry for love is rather not in vogue in those days. Marriage was something of convenience or social imperative, to carry on the name, but only in the right social strata of course.

If you can understand religion and the mindset of those in those times then him walking away is not unusual, in fact its probably the only sensible thing possible.

But it was poignant. I love how you only learn the meaning of the title of the movie in the very final sentence. Very appropriate.

reply

"The freedom of choice we enjoy today did not exist then"

As if that stopped many of these secluded monks from carrying on with one another if they were so disposed.

Some fellows get credit for being conservative when they are only stupid.
- Kin Hubbard

reply

Actually, that's not the way the book ends. The girl is a far less important character in the book, and is taken away by Bernard Gui for trial and execution elsewhere. As William tells Adso, "she is burned flesh".

The only similarity is that Adso gets the girl in neither the book, nor the film.

reply

Now that makes far more sense. I always thought it was a little too convenient that the girl survived ... like they did that to include the cliche last scene because it's Hollywood. Sounds like I was on the money.

Some fellows get credit for being conservative when they are only stupid.
- Kin Hubbard

reply

I'm torn about this. I like the "hollywood endings", which many people in this thread seem to dislike (?). But this "love story" somewhat rubs me wrong way. I mean, Adso is a novis monk (I don't think he had made his vows yet?), and still, he has sex with a girl right after he has met her, even though they can't even speak to each other? I'm sorry, but it just seemed tacky to me. I know there's love at first sight, but this just came off as a one-night-stand rather than "the love of his life". I like the information though, which someone in this thread provided, that it wouldn't have been totally impossible for Adso to marry this girl, if he had gotten into law or banking, even though it would have been frown upon (and his father would probably have disinherited him).

Intelligence and purity.

reply

Funny, until I read this thread, I thought the way the movie ended was that he DID ride off with the girl (& never regretted it)... since I'm a romantic, I guess that's just the way I wanted it to end.

Build a man a fire & he's warm for a night; set a man on fire & he's warm for the rest of his life!

reply

It would have turned the whole film into schmaltz and completely ruined it, that he left her behind was the only thing to do.

reply


I dont understand it either. how come your so bound to find love, so set on saving the girl from her life and when she presents ehrself afterall they bin through he just says no and rides along.
What kind of a blind idiot do you have to be to throw that away.
_____________________
Any last words ?
Shut the *beep* up
-Mutant Chronicles-

reply