SCOOP'S SIDEBAR bulleted item 3 contradicts your "facts" and also implies the sex act was just that--an act.
The third bulleted item on the page to which you linked:
In a spirited and realistic sex scene, Valentina Vargas provides one of the more explicit gyno/procto shots ever committed to mainstream celluloid. Annaud points out in a DVD featurette that he never told Christian Slater what was coming in this scene. Slater knew that there was a love scene in the script, of course, but did not know that the director told Valentina Vargas to surprise Slater by making the scene as real as possible, and to be as aggressive as she could. Slater's natural reaction was captured on camera, and was perfect for the character, who was a naive and virginal novice monk being overpowered by a lusty, experienced peasant girl. I don't know if Vargas actually packed . . . the Slater Sausage at any time, but if not, she came damned close. Slater's penis also makes a few appearances on camera.
I don't see the contradiction here. There's no implication that the sex was an act; there's a statement that the writer doesn't know together with an acknowledgement that at worst it "came damned close." And if Vargas succeeded in "making the scene as real as possible," that would of course mean that she had made it completely real.
As for sources . . . well, the only one of the OP's six points that you're disputing is the first one, and the OP does acknowledge that it's a "supposed" fact. At any rate, I don't have a source at hand either (beyond Annaud's commentary), but I've always heard and read that the sex scene was realistic at least to the point of near-intercourse, and your own source confirms as much.
----
Lazy + smart = efficient.
reply
share