MovieChat Forums > Edge of Darkness (1986) Discussion > GREAT characters, dialogue + acting but ...

GREAT characters, dialogue + acting but unsatisfying + pointless in end


LOVED the dialogue, the characters and it was wonderfully acted.
OKAY!?
Good.


But after about 5 hours....nothing came to anything.
Except the (eventual) death of one man.

Nothing at all happened to the IFF and all involved with it, including the nasty Hugh Fraser.
Joe Don's big stand at the conference (bar killing Grogan eventually) achieved zero.
The American Company's bid for IFF was allowed.
The truth of Emma's death never came out.
The plutonium was just given back anyway & stealing it (bar Grogan's death) was pointless.

Nothing was achieved at all!
Zero.
Events ended at the end of episode 6, with barely any change from episode 1.

For all its faults (the lack of those great characters/interactions/dialogue I mentioned above) Craven/Jedburgh had at least achieved/changed things by the end of the Gibson movie version.

And before all the tedious, right-on, snobs bleat on about 'you wanted a simple happy ending...go watch Hollywood fodder'....I have no problems at all with a downbeat ending or not everything working out.
AT ALL.

But after 6 episodes, 5 hours, of a plot (with much preaching and finger pointing at who the bad guys were) I would like that plot to have moved on from where it was at episode 1, hour 1....& for the antagonists to have at least achieved something, ANYTHING.
That's the whole point of following their journey....to go somewhere.


reply

I'm glad to see that I'm not the only person who felt let down by the ending of this series. I couldn't agree more with your assessment. It was a great build-up to absolutely nothing. In a lot of ways you felt that Ron didn't have any real closure, even after all he'd been through. And to make it worse, he was going to die soon. It's unfortunate that there wasn't something more substantial at the end. Oh well. Good series, but certainly not as spectacular as a lot of the reviews on this site make it out to be.

reply

Realistically, what chance did Craven and Jedbergh ever have? I think that the whole point was that the two main characters never were going to achieve anything - they were up against too much - two Governments, big business, the Establishment, the lot. You could argue that Craven got what he wanted -he found out what had happened to Emma and why - once he'd got that, he didn't see any point in carrying on (he even tells Clemmie he doesn't know what he's going to do and he never really does come to a decision). Maybe Jedbergh got the ending he wanted - he's made his gesture (that nobody else in that room will ever forget), condemned Grogan to a pretty nasty death and then gone out with all guns blazing. There was no way that they were ever going to be the heroes of the hour, not with all that was stacked up against them - but at least they tried...
The fact that there wasn't a 'feelgood' ending meant that the overall message of the show was emphasised - Mankind is destroying the Earth and nobody in power seems to care or be prepared to do anything about it. Almost every character (apart from Craven, Jedbergh and Emma) ends up compromising themselves one way or another, whether it's bending the rules, informing on their comrades, selling out to their opponents, turning a blind eye to what's going on, or even sanctioning murder, and those that don't, end up being destroyed. It's a bleak conclusion - and it's meant to be. It's also far more powerful than a 'feelgood' ending would have been.

reply

I think the ending was right, there was no way it could have happy ending.

Its that man again!!

reply