MovieChat Forums > Smooth Talk (1985) Discussion > * Ending Spoilers*

* Ending Spoilers*

posted 18 years ago by bigbadwolf666
21 replies | jump to latest

There is proof that he does rape. The character is based on a rapist.

Just laying it out there cause i didnt know and for anyone who was interested like i was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Schmid

Charles Schmid is Arnold Friend.

Oates' story was inspired by three Tucson, Arizona murders committed by Charles Schmid, which were profiled in Life Magazine in an article written by Don Moser on March 4, 1966.

More fun stuff

Arnold Friend is often read to represent the devil. His face is described as stretched and mask-like, and his boots stand at unnatural angles — one is actually bent at a right angle at the ankle, suggesting a false leg or possibly a cloven hoof.

I hoped that helped anyone who was interested or as interested as i was.

Suffering? You Haven't Seen Anything Yet!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

I have to disagree with you. I just about Charles and there's mention of him being a rapist.

What Arnold did was talk Connie into having sex and then convinced her nothing happened by what he says when he brings her back home, "I asked you to go for a ride with me today and you came. And that's what happened. Am I right?"

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

did you hear what i said?

there is proof.

Are you going to believe what a psychopath says?

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

I'm confused by your retort.

I am speaking of the real person the character was based on. You know that story is based around a serial killer, right?

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

no im confused by you.

what exactly are you trying to say?

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

You mentioned in your fist post that the character is based on a rapist. I read the story on the real person and it does not mention him being a rapist...a murder, yes, but rapist no. I meant to do further research to prove myself wrong and you right.

I was also mentioning that there's no proof that he (the character in the movie) raped Laura Dern. I think he talked her into having sex and then convinced her nothing happened.

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

ok, i get it now.

you think because a woman didnt report it, know what it was, or did anything about it. that it was mutual.

i think manipulation, seduction, and anything that is not really love is considered rape by me. I know not in society, but think about this,

Would youve felt raped if you were had sex with a man for any other reason than you wanting to?

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

Women have sex with men all the time and its not for "love". Men have sex with women without their being love. But I understand what you are saying.

Laura Dern didn't report it because she wasn't sure took place that afternoon. That's what I got from when she was trying to explain to her sister what she did while they (the family )were gone

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

in her case there is no doubt it was rape. In fear of, is rape.

If you were in her situation, how do you think you wouldve felt?

you know im getting tired of you not answering my queestions, you jess.

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

Her case yes, but what is her mind telling her? That's the question. I'm sure she knows what happened, but he was so manipulative, he probably had her so confused.

Why so hostile?

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] 16 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

How are you going to prove someone talked you into sex?

I know this is going to frustrate you more, but what question did I forget to answer.

I seriously don't mean to seem like I am avoiding your questions or comments, its just that its hard to convey here what I could possibly convey in person.

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

fine, give me a call.

or fly to my house.

um, you dont have to, cops do that. there is tons of ways to prove it. if he admits he had sex with her and then she says that she said no its over for him.

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] Jesstears 16 years ago

ahhhhhhhhhh good point. I mean about the cops always coming by your house

Seriously, you are right and I forgot about the "no" answer.

You're a damn good debater. I am going to have to find other posts by you and get into more debates.

http://visitorqueue.wordpress.com

[–] bigbadwolf666 16 years ago

Also, dont forget if she has tissue rippage and she said it was him, its over. She constantly wanted him out of her property, im sure someone would testify that they saw him with her. Cops would love to beat hes brains out just because he looks suspicious and she looks innocent.

So, are you going to answer my other questions now, or still fiddle around the issues?

Let's put a smile on that face!

[–] starships-1 16 years ago

Was this the 80s or what? I mean she could have easily called the police but she did not. She acted as if there was no mode of communication. No way of getting out of that mess. The story seemed so surreal. I mean think about it if you were a teenager in the 80s would you be listening to James Taylor, also would you buy a cigarette if you don't smoke, also would you be hanging out at a burger joint, also knowing about AIDS would you have sex without a condom. These are things to think about.

[–] smobe12 16 years ago

to Starships-1: only if you missed the point of the movie.

[–] the_zookeeper 16 years ago

Not to mention the fact that the girl in the movie is FIFTEEN YEARS OLD and an older man is pursuing her. It's statutory at the least, and that's bad enough. She was too young mentally to agree to do anything. Any teenager can act like a grown up or dress like one, but to have the emotional or psychological depth to understand that level of manipulation is most likely not developed yet.

I will guess that you don't have families of your own, if that's alright. It's easier to understand, maybe, when you've got your own daughter nearing this age.

The gene pool could use a little chlorine......

[–] Aronofskyistheshizzil 15 years ago

Some of you are retarded. He clearly raped her. He basically told her she could give it up the easy way or the hard way. He made it perfectly clear that he had staked out her family and no one could help her. He and his friend took turns raping girls and Friend liked to force them psychologically as opposed to his friend who appeared to take a more direct route. This is evident when she goes to the phone and friends friend gets out of the car and asks if he should rip out the phone cord. Friend tells him "no it's his turn and that wouldn't be necessary. Later when Friend tells her "they just went for a ride and that was it" he was telling her to keep her mouth shut. I was under the influence that the numbers had something to do with victims of him and his buddy. People are saying it is a bible reference. If that's the case it is my opinion that it has a double meaning. If you didn't get the vibe that she was in great danger the whole last 10 minutes of the movie you need to check your warning bells.

[–] romy1986 14 years ago

I totally agree with the previous post. I cannot believe that anyone could interpret it as anything other than rape. I mean he stood there and pretty much threatened to burn the house down if she didn't come out. A 15 year old girl in a house with no door - what the hell else was she meant to do? It was pretty obvious that if she didn't come out by choice, he was going to make it even worse for her. I guess I personally would have run, but let's be real, two guys, one of them obviously psychotic, it was never going to work out well. With all due respect, anyone who thinks that she agreed to it because she came out,is deluded. Him saying to her that he took her for a drive and she agreed to it was a thinly veiled threat, and trying to make her believe that no one would believe her anyway if she told, or think it was her own fault.

[–] Mister_Anderson 14 years ago

Agree with both of you; he raped her. Look how his demeanor completely changed after he "had" her. Lazily opened the car door for her without leaving the driver's seat. Told her "We went for a ride, that's all we did." Didn't even say goodbye.

MOVIES BY THE MINUTE --> http://moviesbytheminute.blogspot.com

[–] Snoopymichele 13 years ago

I think the reason she didn't call the police is because they only had that one phone in the house. You never saw her mother talking on any other phone. And he was at the screen door and could here everything she was saying. And it seemed to me they had already staked the place out, because Ellie kept saying do you want me to rip THAT phone out. And Arnold was freaking her out about burning down the house, hurting her family, the lady down the street who had passed away, and how he could see her family at the barbecue. THAT was creepy. They were no where in sight-yet he was acting as if he could see them.