I think it's wonderful that two drastically different versions are now available. That said, I greatly prefer the American theatrical cut.
Jerry Goldsmith is a fine composer and his score from "Psycho II" remains one of my all-time favorite scores ever, but his "Legend" score just doesn't work for me (and yes, I see the irony that part of the "Psycho II" score is utilized in the "Legend" director's cut -- where it really doesn't belong!). It's too classical, heavy-handed and sometimes outright obtrusive. The whole film is otherworldly, and Tangerine Dream's strange ethereal score fits it better, in my opinion. Yes, it's synth, but it doesn't feel particularly '80s.
As to the rest of the director's cut... I understand why Darkness was obscured from view until the end -- but for anyone who's seen the trailers/poster/VHS/DVD/Blu-Ray cover, you already know what he looks like. By cutting around his face, you miss out on Curry's phenomenal performance. The additional dialogue is mostly clunky and the additional scenes aren't really necessary to tell the story. The only big upside I see to the director's cut is the extra footage of Picardo's Meg Mucklebones, a character whose scenes never should've been whittled down to nothing.
Of course, at the end of the day, both versions of the film are director's cuts. This isn't a case like "Blade Runner" where the studio meddled and bastardized the movie; Ridley Scott did it himself. Which probably explains why there are defenders of both versions.
And as a p.s. I absolutely do not mourn the loss of the lost Faerie Dance sequence. If the photos/audio are any indication, it was thoroughly, annoyingly unnecessary.
reply
share