One of the funniest things about this part is that the priest is trying to put it in the heads of those youngsters that although they have socials (as we called it when I went to catholic school), they do not condone the idea of lust. As if to say, "lust is not allowed here, neither is the thought of sex". Okay, why have coed dances then? The anger and emotion of the priest is amusing because it is so contrived.
yeah, 9 years is a long time, but in the absence of the post being locked for replies...
you've attached lust/sex to the social as if it "must" occur, and if it "must" well then why is the church preaching against it. does this mean that bingo must not be played because someone there might have greed? why have kneelers because someone is getting lazy (sloth)?
the point being, while i understand that it (sex) does happen, it is very possible to have social interactions with the opposite sex that don't include having sex.
***
Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time!
reply
share