MovieChat Forums > Fright Night (1985) Discussion > Why would Jerry give Charley a choice?

Why would Jerry give Charley a choice?


A very old and very evil master vampire like Jerry gives Charley a choice to just forget about him. Why would he do this and not just kill him? I doubt an evil vampire master like Jerry would bother with the choice and just kill Charley instead.

reply

I think Charlie being killed right after a new neighbor moves in might've caused too much attention? Also Charlie had already made the police aware of an issue with Jerry, so he'd be on the radar if Charlie went missing. Not sure. I mean he could've killed him somewhere away from the neighborhood or school. But then we wouldn't have a movie.

reply

Yeah, I think Jerry just didn't want a murder investigation taking place right next door.

reply

I think Charlie being killed right after a new neighbor moves in might've caused too much attention? Also Charlie had already made the police aware of an issue with Jerry, so he'd be on the radar if Charlie went missing. Not sure. I mean he could've killed him somewhere away from the neighborhood or school. But then we wouldn't have a movie.


This.

"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens😬

reply

I second this.

Killing Charley would essentially result in him having to pack up and move again. If he kills Charley the police would certainly investigate him. Charley called the cops on him already, which makes him suspect #1. Jerry can't go out during the day and the cops arent going to casually let him show up at the precinct for questioning at his leisure, which would be a big issue when they start bringing him in for questioning.

reply

Being a master, he has enough sense to let things be. Jerry lays it all out and then gives him the chance to walk away completely. I think I would've taken it. There have got to be worse things than being on good terms with an old and powerful vampire.

Sail away tiny sparrow...

reply

I don't think Jerry wanted to hurt Charley.Jerry seemed relatively peaceful and figured Charley was just another kid. I feel like Jerry has dealt with people like Charley, but Charley was the first one who actually challenged him and didn't take him up on his offer. That had to be a blow to his ego.

I'm feeling rough, I'm feeling raw, I'm in the prime of my life.

reply

Jerry didn't seem pure evil, and to be honest, I don't even think he initially intended on causing Charley any harm until he started snooping and refused his offer to look the other way. This Jerry seemed perfectly content on just feeding off of hookers. His intention was only to feed when need be and keep a low profile. Him offering Charley a choice just went to show that he at least had a shred of humanity and was willing to spare someone whom he didn't he didn't really need to harm.



Logan, buddy. It's me, Deadpool! I shot youuuuuu....


reply

I concur with WhoopsieThree-D. Jerry Dandridge showed signs of real humanity (rare in vampire flicks up until that point). He fed on prostitutes and presumably vagrants -- people whose lives are deemed meaningless in society. Charley was a smart kid with a bright future (despite his struggles with trig), which Jerry recognized.

There are two lines in the script from that scene that didn't make it to the film. Charley says, "If you kill me, everyone will be suspicious, my mother, the police..." Jerry responds, "Not if it looks like an accident. A fall, for instance." Then he flings open the window. This tells me Jerry wasn't concerned about the cops. Charley posed a bigger threat and Jerry just wanted to be left alone.


reply

I concur with WhoopsieThree-D. Jerry Dandridge showed signs of real humanity (rare in vampire flicks up until that point). He fed on prostitutes and presumably vagrants -- people whose lives are deemed meaningless in society. Charley was a smart kid with a bright future (despite his struggles with trig), which Jerry recognized.

Incorrect. Jerry isn't empathising with Charley, nor does he care Charley is a "good kid" The reason he is feeding on the dispossessed, hookers and vagrants is because at that time at least, deaths of those sorts of people weren't as keenly looked into by the police. There weren't as many people in those peoples lives to clamour for an investigation. He's being clever and hiding himself, not giving the game away. The only reason he's giving Charley a choice to shut up is from self-preservation - he knows killing Charley, or both Charley and his mum is going to bring police too close to home - especially after Charley has already reported him to the police. he'd be the first suspect. So he does the only thing he can. he tries to scare Charley into shutting up so it'll all blow over. When Charley refuses, he has no choice left but to kill him. I'm assuming Dandridge and Cole would've done a moonlight flit immediately after and the house be back on the market. Jerry is multi-layered as a film villain, but he's also a predator, pure and simple. Everything he does initially is about keeping attention away from himself. It's not out of humanity and recognising a good kid when he meets one.

There are two lines in the script from that scene that didn't make it to the film. Charley says, "If you kill me, everyone will be suspicious, my mother, the police..." Jerry responds, "Not if it looks like an accident. A fall, for instance." Then he flings open the window. This tells me Jerry wasn't concerned about the cops. Charley posed a bigger threat and Jerry just wanted to be left alone.

No, Jerry is very concerned about the cops hence the very obvious efforts to make sure his kills didn't attract the kind of outrage that leads to task forces and major police investigations close to home. He's trying to cloak himself in suburbia. It's simply at this point he has no choice, after Charley refuses to drop it, but to chance his arm at killing Charley. That's the interesting thing about the movie. Dandridge is a killer yes - but Charley is the one who puts himself in the firing line, along with his family and friends. Dandridge's last wish is to kill anyone who's gonna be missed or will bring attention to him. It's just Charley effectively backs Dandridge into a corner by refusing to shut up. Dandridge has no chice now but to kill him and hope for the best.





Give me a hedgehog and I'll show you.

reply

I don't think Jerry wanted to hurt Charley.Jerry seemed relatively peaceful and figured Charley was just another kid. I feel like Jerry has dealt with people like Charley, but Charley was the first one who actually challenged him and didn't take him up on his offer. That had to be a blow to his ego.


^^This. That made Jerry very upset that Charlie wouldn't butt out of his business so to speak. Definetely a blow to the ego especially for a ages old vamp like Jerry, this puny high schooler is standing up to me? Ironically, not taking Charlie that seriously is really what cost him in the end.

"I am the ultimate badass, you do not wanna `*beep*` wit me!"- Hudson in Aliens.

reply

Just a touch of humanity in the old monster. Gave Charlie a chance. It somehow made him more believable. I've never seen that before in a vamp film.

reply

Jerry clearly had humanity because in Amy he found a double for his presumably long dead lover. Not a very good reason to love someone, but better than none.

"Knowledge is cheap at any price"

reply

I am a huge fan of both the original and the remake. Jerry was much more human in the original, and I agree with the assertion that he had no intention of hurting Charlie and just wanted to feed in peace. After Charlie refused his "choice", Jerry decided the best way to take care of it was to eliminate Charlie. He seemed to jump at the chance to "prove" he wasn't a vampire, and probably would have laid off had he not found that glass from Peter Vincent's mirror.

In the remake, Jerry was more predatory and inhuman than most vampires portrayed on a major film in a long time. I found it to be quite refreshing after so many (as Evil Ed puts it) "love-sick and noble" vampires we've gotten used to. Jerry didn't give Ed or Charlie choices, he simply decided to eliminate the issue in a calculating manner.

MarYah haw Yeshua Meshikha!
http://mightcontainspoilers.wordpress.com

reply

[deleted]

A very old and very evil master vampire like Jerry gives Charley a choice to just forget about him. Why would he do this and not just kill him? I doubt an evil vampire master like Jerry would bother with the choice and just kill Charley instead.


What I got from it Jerry was not pure evil. Earlier this year, I listened to pirate movie commentary from the filmmaker and the actors and that make me see the film in a whole new light. He doesn't find any amusement in confronting Charley and would rather not, but must (In the commentary, Chris Sarandon said he wanted Dandrige to whistle "Whistle While You Work" to show that.). He tells Charley that he will give him something he does not have as a sign of this. It also shows Jerry as a tortured soul. He does not feed for fun or amusement, feeds to survive, rarely kills for revenge, and misses his long, lost love. That is why I love the film. It shows a different angle to vampire lore. Yes, he is a baddie, but not pure evil like most films before it had shown.

MM

reply

A very old and very evil master vampire like Jerry gives Charley a choice to just forget about him. Why would he do this and not just kill him? I doubt an evil vampire master like Jerry would bother with the choice and just kill Charley instead.


Because vampires used to have personality and depth. They weren't so polarized as mindless killing machines and puppies. They actually had complexity and could sympathize with the hero at times.

reply

TBH, I don't think Jerry would've totally forgotten about Charlie, maybe in the short term though.

reply