I personally thought ending A should have been the real ending, although I did also like B.
shareBy far ending C. It was the most unexpected of them all with everyone each committing a murder, Wadsworth really being Mr. Body, and Mr. Green being an FBI agent undercover. Regardless, it was the real ending remember (but here's what really happened...).
shareI also like C, with Michael KcKeen being the undercover agent.
shareMrs Peacock ending is the best.
shareEnding A.
Really there aren't really true endings even though they said that ending C was the "what really happened."
Ending A makes more sense. -maybe except for Plum's assertion of Mr. Boddy's death.
Ending C implies that Wadsworth/Mr.Boddy did not anticipate that the fake Boddy would turn on him when he gives the weapons to the guests.
Also if Mr. Green was some top agent then it wouldn't make sense for him to be tossed around all the time during the film.
The Mr. Green ending.
I like the surprises we get in that ending to the very end.
Ending C, though it might in part be due to I would always play as Mr. Green with the actual game.
Though I think my favorite line of the endings is the Mrs. Peacock ending. "Mrs. Peacock was a man?!" (slap, slap).
This movie was why I always played as Mr. Green in the actual game.
And I really really hoped I wouldn't die
The ending where they all are part of the murder plot except Green who was an FBI agent. I like all three of them, but to me this one is the one that makes the most sense. And if anything else it had Kahn's great "Flames on the side of my face" line.
I don't apologize. I'm sorry, but that's how I am. - Homer Simpson
I liked C the best, but each had their charm.
I just like to imagine what it would have been like to be in the theater and see ONE ending, and talk about it (or argue with coworkers or friends) around the water cooler ("THAT'S not what happened!").
c is my favorite
it's never Joan Van Ark- Marge Simpsons
I kind of like all 3. But I guess the 3rd one is the most exciting ending with it turning out everyone killed their own informants except Mr. Green. Though it's possible Wadsworth/Mr. Boddy may've been his informant. None of the endings even say who his informant is.
Green Goblin is great! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1L4ZuaVvaw
(Spoilers ahead. Just in case.)
My favorite is A, for two reasons. First, they definitively name one of the 6 guests as the killer (although she still didn't physically kill the first two victims), and actually give a good explanation for how the killer knew about the secret passages. Second, I love Wadsworth and don't want him to be the bad guy.
My least favorite is B because it's not even plausible. I suppose I can buy that Mrs. Peacock realizes that her former cook is at the mansion just based on having been served one of her "favorite recipes" (Remember, none of the guests actually see the cook before she's killed). But how could she possibly have known about the secret passages? Plus, she would have had to separate from Professor Plum twice, and go upstairs and risk running into Miss Scarlet and Col. Mustard twice. Notice that this is the only ending that doesn't have any "flashbacks" of the murders being committed. Wadsworth just says "you murdered them all," without explaining how she did it, based only on the flimsy evidence that she recognized the dish served at dinner, and she wasn't in the doorway when the others ran to Yvette. Besides, nothing really funny happens in this ending, aside from "Mrs. Peacock was a man?" <Slap! Slap!>
Put your signature in italics or something so I don't mistake it as part of your post.
Second, I love Wadsworth and don't want him to be the bad guy.
My least favorite is B because it's not even plausible.
I just realized a mistake this old poster made. Technically parts of Ending A still apply in the other 2 endings. Since they all take up from Wadsworth shutting off the lights. That means the explanation of Mrs. Peacock screaming being why they didn't hear the cook screaming is also part of those endings. As is Wadsworth run down of the entire evening to everyone.
share> None of the endings even say who his informant is.
Mr. Green was never being blackmailed and he had no informant. He was a plant (not a fruit). Notice that when Mr. Green outed himself as a homosexual, Wadsworth got a confused look on his face and shuffled through his papers. He obviously had no information on Green's situation and didn't expect Green to say that.
Now, that kind of messes up the ending, since Wadsworth reveals that he is Mr. Boddy and that he's been blackmailing all of them all this time. He should have known all along that Green wasn't one of his "clients".
--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?
"Mr. Green was never being blackmailed and he had no informant. He was a plant (not a fruit). Notice that when Mr. Green outed himself as a homosexual, Wadsworth got a confused look on his face and shuffled through his papers. He obviously had no information on Green's situation and didn't expect Green to say that.
Now, that kind of messes up the ending, since Wadsworth reveals that he is Mr. Boddy and that he's been blackmailing all of them all this time. He should have known all along that Green wasn't one of his "clients"."
That explanation only applies to the third ending. Not the 1st or 2nd. Also I did notice that Wadsworth does look surprised when Green confessed what he did. I took that more as him being shocked he'd confessed to what he was being blackmailed for.
I also noticed his expression while looking through his papers and it seemed one of surprise, not shock. No doubt a reference to the third ending.
share