MovieChat Forums > The Woman in Red (1984) Discussion > I'm surprised Kelly Brook had the bush

I'm surprised Kelly Brook had the bush


I thought in the 80s, bold was in!?

reply

It's NOT Kelly Brook, it's Kelly Le Brock. They're two different people. One is British and the other one is American.

This is the one from The Woman In Red!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelly_Le_Brock

reply

That's her, hana

reply

I think you meant "bald" not bold. But thinking of that scene naturally causes one to confuse words, names... and give that grin in your avatar, I guess.

Never be complete.

reply

shaved, hana.

reply

I think bold became popular in late 90s around the time Houston did the 500 not out movie, hana. If you watch 80s porn and see Christy Canyon, Tracey Adams, Hyapatia Lee and those Lynn girls, you will see bush in abundance.

reply

[deleted]

COR! I will watch it, hana

reply

Everybody has some kind of a bush in films. Labia is wrong, you can't show it in R films. I only remember Margo in Wolf not wearing a merkin, because being fully waxed was a part of a dialogue and a character, still there was no labia.

So assuming that an actress liked to have a bush is wrong.

reply

what is the merkin, hana!?

reply

Kelly LeBROCK, *beep*

reply

This might shock you, but people weren't afraid of body hair in the past.
It's only Gen Y/Millennials that seem to have this terrible fear of each other's natural body hair.
Thankfully Gen Z are embracing being natural, including body hair, again.

reply

I never understood the complete absence of hair, are they all trying to make themselves look like prepubescent girls? Is that the goal to make themselves attractive to men that get excited at the prospect of being a child molester? I never did get it... Not a fan of a raging jungle bush... but the bald look just seems wrong.

reply

Yeah, that's it Einstein. It's because guys fantasize about being child molesters. We're not all as evolved and sophisticated as you.

reply