Was Petersen right?


When Petersen admitted to the killing of Waters, his simple reason was that 'some things need getting rid of,' I personally would never have condoned killing such a man regardless of his despicable character, but do you think that to an extent he was justified in murdering Waters under the circumstances in which his company was being mistreated by their own commanding officer?

I do understand the anger and frustration that Petersen was going through, and probably most men in the company felt the same way too (except of course that kiss-ass Wilkie), but my own conviction is that it probably would have been a wiser idea for Petersen to just let Waters be and continue going down his drunken binge, given Water's deteriorating emotional and mental condition, he would have eventually been deemed unfit by the Army to command his company, therefore preventing him from ever mistreating his own men again.

reply

Anyone?

reply

peterson WAS right to do what he did.how could davenport ask him what right he had to decide who could be colored when waters had already done the same thing...twice?

reply

[deleted]

I do not think for one second that peterson cared about that man Waters and his buddies killed in WW1 or CJ.
If he did I would look at Peterson in a different way.

Remember Waters liked Peterson because he is wished he could be like him. Remember Peterson was talking about how Waters was one of those copy cat n*gg*rs a yessa boss man? That is why Peterson hated Waters. Well Peterson hated Waters for the The same exact reason Waters hated CJ. ANd they both did the same exact thing to the person they hated, killed them.

You see we know and so does the other people in the outfit know that Waters liked Peterson. We heard the convo Waters had with CJ about how the day of the people thinking they are all fools like him are over. Peterson is not privy to that. Peterson thinks Waters is a yessa man but in reality Waters really isn't and is looking to make sure other black people do not have to go through the mess he went through to survive. If Peterson knew that Waters was really like him, he would never had killed him, because he would of understood he liked him because he represented the the kind of black man that was not going to be fools like CJ. But Peterson was such a hot head he never saw this. So he kills him because he thinks Waters is the same type of guy Waters believes CJ is. And he is wrong in that belief.
I have to say I thought CJ was the most objectional person in the movie. I hated him. When I heard Waters say in the bar he thinks he , CJ is dangerous I agree and how much damage a ignorant negro could do. I actually agree, but I do not think he should of died. But Waters is so full of anger he cannot see that the guy needed t be educated not killed. And the same goes from the Peterson character He should of been educated about what Waters went through, talked to the guy , but he was so full of anger too. Oh btw how come Peterson ran as soon as he found out they were gong over seas to fight?
It shows the cowardice in him. Something Waters did not do. So who is the bad guy here.

reply

<When Petersen admitted to the killing of Waters, his simple reason was that 'some things need getting rid of,' I personally would never have condoned killing such a man regardless of his despicable character, but do you think that to an extent he was justified in murdering Waters under the circumstances in which his company was being mistreated by their own commanding officer?>

No. While I understand what Peterson did, it was still wrong. It was still murder. Waters was a thoroughly despicable character, racist, and abusive, but still the killing was not in any wise justified. In fact, I seriously doubt that the law officer in Peterson's court-martial would permit such a defense. It would never be allowed as a defense in a civil court either.
This is not to say that Waters' character would not have any play; it would, be a factor in determining the penalty, either life imprisonment, or hanging.
But Peterson was still guilty of murder.

reply

No. While I understand what Peterson did, it was still wrong. It was still murder. Waters was a thoroughly despicable character, racist, and abusive, but still the killing was not in any wise justified. In fact, I seriously doubt that the law officer in Peterson's court-martial would permit such a defense. It would never be allowed as a defense in a civil court either.
This is not to say that Waters' character would not have any play; it would, be a factor in determining the penalty, either life imprisonment, or hanging.
But Peterson was still guilty of murder.

Racist, abusive...Sarge crossed the line years ago. He was a murderer, a homicidal sociopath, who victimized the weak because he despised his own weaknesses, but was intelligent enough to rise to a position of power. Where in past and recent history have we seen his ilk before? "Some men need killing." I'm only sorry Pete got caught.

reply

<Racist, abusive...Sarge crossed the line years ago. He was a murderer, a homicidal sociopath, who victimized the weak because he despised his own weaknesses, but was intelligent enough to rise to a position of power. Where in past and recent history have we seen his ilk before? "Some men need killing." I'm only sorry Pete got caught.>

I actually agree with you in part here. Waters was a despicable person. However, at Peterson's court-martial this would have been beside the point in determining guilt. About the only thing the defense could have done was to introduce what Waters did into the record in an attempt (probably in vain) to spare Peterson from the hangman. I don't believe that they could use Waters' character to argue that Peterson was not guilty of murder; in my view, he was.

reply

He was wrong. Has anyone ever met a black WW 1 vet? Well I have. My grandfather was one along with a few of his friends. He told me about how the white man went over to France and told people that black men had tails. They were so worried that the black soldier was going to go after white french wpmen. They thought of they made up a story like that. He said people would walk up to him and look at from behind, hw could he sit down, they would even ask if they could see it, the tail.

Eventually that story of course was disproven but imagine the people that you are fighting for calling you a animal? In the end French treated black men soldiers as hero's, not this country, they treated them like animals, with tails! We must remember where most of those Army bases were and still are, in the deep south. My father was a WW2 vet and he was stationed in Alabama and he said it was terrible down there. I had a boyfriend who was a Vietnam vet and he was stationed down sought too and he said white guy would give them hell. He had seen white guys kill black men during combat because they could.

Imagine how it was in WW 1 for a black man stationed down in Mississippi with a whole lot of white southern soldiers and most of these bigots were your commanding officers. many of these black soldier came from up north too. Then imagine staying in the army for 20 plus years with the same type of people running your life.

Then WW2 comes and they are still treated like garbage. Nazi prisoners were treated better then black soldiers and that is a fact. Peterson should of known the self hatred amassed by a black soldier who has been in the army since 1915. He hated CJ and I hated him too, the guitar playing country boy because he represented what he had to act like for so many years being in the army. the Yessa man. He like the Denzal Washington character because he was who he wanted to be, but could not because he hated himself so much.

And as we know the oppressed become even worse oppressers when they get some power. I feel that the lawyer knew that Peterson should of known this and that is why he asked him what gives him the right to do what he did? He should his history, he should of known where Waters came from and why he was the way he was. This not excuse Waters from what he was doing , but in his own way I think Waters was trying to toughen those guys up and make sure that they did not get into any trouble because he knew what would happen if the white officers got a hold of them.


I do not think most people realize the magnitude of pain our black soldiers have gone through. And they keep fighting for this country even though they were segregated, paid less, treated worse then the nazi's by their own country. And when they returned from fighteing they were barred from enjoying the simple pleasure of life such as buying a house because of place like Levittown that had deed restrictions about selling to black people. And getting a education because many schools would not allow black people to study there. My uncle Earl was a Tuskegee Airman, look at where that is at, Alabama. They were not even allowed to fly until later on in the war. They even had biogted leaders who treated them like they were dumb.

Congress did every thing they could to keep them from fighting. When he got home do you think a american airline company would hire him or other Airman? He had to leave this country and go fly for BOAC. And forget about buying a house. THe problem was so bad my grandfather who was in real estate had to build middle class housing in St Albans so these vets would be able to buy a good place to live.
So next time you see a old black soldier from WW2 think about that because if you do no one would asking if Peterson was right. Thank god most black vets do not have the self hate Peterson had, and it is a wonder.

reply

<So next time you see a old black soldier from WW2 think about that because if you do no one would asking if Peterson was right. Thank god most black vets do not have the self hate Peterson had, and it is a wonder.>

I appreciate your father's service to his country. If he were alive I would have you tell him that, but you indicate that he is not, so I will tell you.

reply

Oh thanks. Yes so many of them are dead now. I remember just a few years ago there were plenty of WW2 vets, like most of my fathers friends and now just like that I do not see too many. Heck I remember WWI vets. My grandfather passed away 20 years ago at 90. I never see any of them left, I am sure there are a few though. My grandfather really had some interesting stories. The mustard gas and the killing people before the horses, how terrible tose trenches were.

reply

I think that there are fewer than ten World War One veterans left alive, all of them over 100 years old. About ten years ago I saw one at the VA nursing home in Wichita, Kansas. Most of the guys there were from the Second World War, and the Korean War, with one or two Vietnam vets. These men all deserve our respect and our thanks.
I have spoken to veterans of the Spanish-American War, one of whom was my great-great uncle. This same uncle was an old-time Oklahoma lawman who had a few claims to fame, one of which was that he took a shot at Charles Arthur Floyd. Mr. Floyd was perhaps better known as "Pretty Boy" Floyd.
Sorry to go off-topic, but hopefully you found that little tidbit interesting.

reply

That is very interesting. I was over on the St Valentine Day Massacre forum talking about various gangsters and I think Pretty Boy Floyds name came up. It is funny because my grandparents we all in their 30's at the time and I would ask them if they remember people like Bonnie and Clyde and they said they only heard about them when they got killed because they were in the midwest and my family all lives in NY.
We were having a big discussion about Dillinger over on that forum and who really killed him.

I do not ever think I met a Spanish AMerican war veteren, But funny I was walking on a beach years ago over here on Long Island and found this club from the Maine.
My grandfather would be 111 if he was still alive. So I am not surprised if there is just 10 alive. Now the Korean War vets are getting up in age.

Thanks for the tidbit, it is very interesting. I love that kind of stuff.

reply

"Who...gave you the right to decide--who is fit to be a Negro and who is not?"

Peterson made the same mistake Waters did--as a lot of you noticed (goody).

"Thus began our longest journey together." To Kill a Mockingbird

reply

Waters felt that a black man at that time had to work twice as hard for half the glory. He was prparing his men for what they would face in the real world.

reply

Waters was a piece of sh!t who deserved to die.

I'm happiest...in the saddle.

reply

Yeah, Waters was objectionable indeed. But Peterson shouldn't have wasted his life taking his. Tragic, all of it.

Waters was a self-hating sociopath masquerading as a proud black man. Okay, maybe he WAS proud, but stepping on other black soldiers to prove to white soldiers just how great of a fella he was was futile, at best -- they generally hated blacks anyway. Deep down, Waters knew this, and alluded to as much during his drunken tirade the night he was killed.

In my view, the themes of this movie are need for acceptance and racism as *beep* Throughout the movie, the black soldiers are anxious to go to war to be part of the larger effort to defeat the Nazis -- despite the fact that the nation they're fighting for sticks it to them at every turn. Then you have Waters who serves as the self-appointed "overseer" (reminiscent of those during slavery) who's as vile to the black soldiers as many of the racist white soldiers on the base. He thinks that after WWII, things will be different for black folks --i.e., they will be accepted -- so its his job to root out unworthy blacks (e.g., CJ) and keep others "in their place." But, of course, the mindf!ck of racism is that, all while he was "overseeing" other black folks, claiming how much more superior he was, harping on the importance of rubbing elbows with white folks, those very white folks weren't going to accept him anyway. He felt powerless, so he exercised control via a virulent form of intra-racism against those in his command. It's too bad that Waters didn't use his post as a leader to instill some pride in CJ, instead of punishing him.

Although Waters was deplorable, I couldn't help but sympathize because of the mindf!ck. The man was lost.

Rollins's character sheds a tear because he knows how much of a mindf!ck all of it is.

reply

When my mother and I watched the film on TV, from start to end, we were divided over the fate of Waters. I thought he should have lived (agreeing with you, the OP); my mother didn't. Though Waters wanted his men to be good as (even better than) their white counterparts, being cruel to them didn't help them much.

reply

Peterson was not right. It's the whole point of the film, IMO ... the bitter irony of Peterson judging whether Waters was fit to be a Negro when Waters had done the same thing to CJ. But after CJ killed himself, Waters understood that he hadn't done his race a service; all he had done was help the other race the service of taking out another threatening black male -- one who was stronger and faster, and could swing the bat better than the white guys. And that's why Waters tells Peterson "they still hate you" right before he got shot. He had realized that he wasn't helping the black race by being complicit in CJ's death -- he was only helping the whites who hated the blacks.

I think that's such a powerful message, which is why this is one of my all-time favorite films. Of course, so is Amadeus, so I can't say that Soldier's Story got screwed, necessarily, at Oscar that year.

reply

Davenport was silent after Peterson made his statement about Waters because he agreed with him. But then he collected himself and, out of duty, asked Peterson what right he had to decide who was fit to be negro. When Peterson and Smalls were taken away, Davenport cries at the window because he knew that what he had just asked Peterson was the question that should have been asked Waters. Also, the duties of his job and his cultural empathy were in conflict; he wasn't thrilled about putting his 'own' away.

reply