MovieChat Forums > The Natural (1984) Discussion > A different ending in the book

A different ending in the book


The novel (by Bernard Malamud) book doesn’t mention Roy’s childhood, except he (Roy) admits his mother was a whore, his father died when he was very young and he went to live with his grandmother until she died, then was put in an orphanage. There was no childhood sweetheart who grew up to be Glenn Close. Her part (Iris, the woman in red, not white) was a Chicago fan of his who simply stood to rout for him when he came up to bat that memorable time he broke the clock (and his slump) in her presence. They got together. She was a never-married single mother, 33 years-old (and already a grandmother via an illegitimate daughter). She had no son, by Roy or any other man.

In the end, Roy, still wanting to marry Memo (who was penniless in the book) and fearing his longevity in the game, succombed to the bribe of $35 thousand by the Judge to throw the playoff game. But feeling okay (and he always played left field, not right, as Bump Baily had), he changed his mind in mid-game. However, he struck out (using the alternate bat) in the last inning with the winning run on base instead of getting the big hit as portrayed in the movie. And the Knights lost the pennant.

Roy still got the 35K after the game but felt bad and that’s when he took it back to the Judge, and there in the office he beat him up, Gus too. While there he also discovered that Memo had helped set him up, and she still pined for Bump anyway. And that’s where the author left it, except that Iris had written him a letter and now he knew she was pregnant by him. The end.

reply

The book was incredibly dark and depressing. It's amazing that someone could read that book, and end up making a movie with Hobbs as a hero.

reply

That's Hollywood!

reply

This is one of the few times that I'm glad that "Hollywood" changed the ending of the book. The movie's ending is a pure classic and I loved every corny moment of the "Natural"
Maybe they can do remake of "Romeo and Juliet" and let the poor kids live.(er, I guess not, but can't blame for little wishful thinking)

reply

The "Hollywood" ending was confusing because we're like, "What? He's alright? I thought he was dying." It felt tacked on.

reply

it's a powerful moment!


Season's Greetings

reply

The reason the filmmakers changed this ending is because the target audience would have hated the movie. The producers geared this film as a feel good sports movie where the hero ultimately triumphs. Depicting Roy as a cheat goes against the whole Robert Redford character he ha built over the years in cinema. It would not have worked for the film. The book shows the harsh reality of the matter. Personally, I like both endings. The book's ending was appropriate for the book and the movie's ending for the movie.

reply

If I remember the books ending correctly, even though he took the judges money(mostly because he was talked into it by Memo), during his last at bat he decided he was going to screw it and win the game because he knew he could. But then Wonderboy broke, and he struck out anyway, even though he was trying. So he wasn't really a cheat. He even gave(or threw) the money back after the game even though he didn't have to.

reply