MovieChat Forums > Missing in Action (1984) Discussion > What was Braddocks response to the Gener...

What was Braddocks response to the General's charge against him

posted 16 years ago by Burdendrkd
4 replies | jump to latest

Hey does anyone remember what the charge that the general said Braddock was charged of for having a $20,000 dollar bounty on his head. I missed it completely.

[–] Tony_Hedlund 15 years ago

I suspect that part was either cut out or never revealed... Anyone else care to comment on this?

Some movie-people screw up cuts and pastes when editing. My DVD has some sort of resize from 16:9 (Or something like that) to anamorphic WS so there's a fat black frame around it... Disturbing as hell...

Top of every forum:"View: ... | ... | ... | nest" <-Choose "nest"!!

[–] vny109-1 13 years ago

Mine has that too. But yeah, It kinda sucks they never went into detail with that. The ending bothered me as well as it finished before we could see the Senator (or his secretaries) reaction to Braddock bringing back the POW's.

[–] Verdoux-1 13 years ago

Maybe they put that bounty after he escaped the POW camp (that would at least seem logical).

[–] phillipsdan83 11 years ago

War crimes against the Vietnamese people was the charge. When General Tran reveals the bounty though, Braddock says that it was for "killing a$$holes like you".