MovieChat Forums > Missing in Action (1984) Discussion > Wait, so this and the prequel were filme...

Wait, so this and the prequel were filmed at the same time?


Let me get this straight. They ended to make this film the sequel, but they decided that it was the better of the two films and chose to make the other film a prequel instead? There's some logic to that the original usually outsells the sequel and presenting the more entertaining one first can be used as a hook to try and bring some of the viewers back. On the other hand, they might have been better served to present it in a Missing in Action: Part I & Part II style. This would allow for greater continuity and a rarity; a sequel which surpasses the original. It might also make it seem like something grander. Instead of getting the story and seeing that which preceded it, you'd get one continuous tale.

Perhaps if the two proved successful, they could have made it a trilogy with Vinh's unseen superior, General Jung, as the main villain. I know that they made a third film, but it featured an entirely new villain to the series and no real continuity. The back-story of him having a child with a Vietnamese woman might even be somewhat contradictory as the child didn't enter into his consciousness until more than a decade later and no mention was made in the other two films.

reply

Let me get this straight. They ended to make this film the sequel, but they decided that it was the better of the two films and chose to make the other film a prequel instead? There's some logic to that the original usually outsells the sequel and presenting the more entertaining one first can be used as a hook to try and bring some of the viewers back. On the other hand, they might have been better served to present it in a Missing in Action: Part I & Part II style. This would allow for greater continuity and a rarity; a sequel which surpasses the original. It might also make it seem like something grander. Instead of getting the story and seeing that which preceded it, you'd get one continuous tale.

Think someone on this board once mentioned the script for the prequel may have been written first, but a sequel was written before filming began, and became the original. I'm not sure if both films were literally filmed side by side, then after a screening they decided to release the sequel as the first, and the original instead as a prequel.

I wonder if they could've confined both, as in story involves events of original, while prequel scenes are just flashbacks.

Perhaps if the two proved successful, they could have made it a trilogy with Vinh's unseen superior, General Jung, as the main villain. I know that they made a third film, but it featured an entirely new villain to the series and no real continuity. The back-story of him having a child with a Vietnamese woman might even be somewhat contradictory as the child didn't enter into his consciousness until more than a decade later and no mention was made in the other two films.

Been a while since I last watched all three, but I think first he was POW where his wife is mentioned to have moved on a remarried, and then later after the escape he meets and marries the Vietnamese woman, which was 1975? I can't remember when THE BEGINNING too place.

When he thought his new wife had been killled, he leaves the country. Unaware she's also pregnant. Then the events of the first movie happen, then later the rest of the third film, in which he learns of his second wife's survival, and later son he never knew he had.


For DEMONIC TOYS and updates on Full Moon Films:
www.freewebs.com/demonictoys/

reply

FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND IS THE 2ND PART WHICH WAS THE PREQUEL WAS ORIGINALLY SUPPOSED TO BE THE FIRST ONE,BUT THEY LIKED THE OTHER ONE WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE PART 2 SO MUCH,THEY DECIDED TO RELEASE THEM THE WAY THEY DID.THEY HAD IT PLANNED ORIGINALLY AS A 3 PART TRILOGY,BUT WHEN THEY SWITCHED THEM UP,THEY ENDED UP MAKING A PART 3,THAT WASN'T THAT GREAT.

reply

Cannon films was famous for doing this with their movies.They did this with King Solomon's Mines and Allan Quartermain And The Lost City Of Gold.They supposedly did this with a few other films as well like Breakin' and Breakin' 2.I also heard they did the same with the first 2 American Ninja films as well.Only they released them a year and a half apart.But who really knows.

reply

[deleted]

American Ninja 1 & 2 were definitely released in the order they were made, no switching like with Missing In Action 1 & 2.

reply

I think it's great how they did this.

reply

So your saying you rather be confused first then understand with the prequel after? I rather see the prequel as the first and understand the way it should of been. I think is is dumb this way. So many movies doing prequels after sequels that it is so stupid.

No more IMDB boards for me!

reply