This is a Miyazaki film and a classic. That would be like remaking Star Wars(OT) or Godfather or Pulp Fiction... You just don't do that!
All Miyazaki's characters are better to remain animated because that way you can't connect them with a real person. You can only associate them with yourself or imagine how your princess Nausicaä or Mononoke or any other character would be like. They are made to be animated!!! The characters, the places, the atmosphere, the music... everything is perfect and thought to be as it is.
Only remake I would go to watch would be one made by Miyazaki himself, but I know of no reason why he would remake something that he already made perfect. Instead he could use that time for making another masterpiece.
And the same goes for pretty much all Miyazaki's movies.
I like his movies a lot too, especially Castle in the Sky and Nausicaä, i love the insect and Alien-like Ancient themes, which could look really awesome in a live action movie to be honest.
I'm not saying they should make them into live action movies, but combine the Hellboy (or League of Extraordinary Men) Steampunk with the colorful imagery of Avatar, it could be so wonderful, but it's most likely going to fail in some sort of way.
They could try to make a frame by frame live action remake.. But yeah, i rather watch an authentic movie that combines themes from Nausicaa and Castle in the Sky, rather than a full remake of either of the two, also Miyazaki said he was going to take it easy, and also announced that he is retiring (i think) But Disney owns Studio Ghibli now, so who knows what will happen in the future.
I kinda like the environmentalist messages in his movies, that the US cuts apparently so desperately wanted to get rid of, it is a message that i want to connect with, which is probably also why i loved Wall-E so much (just to name one). Disney owns Pixar too now and i dont expect a Disney's Cut of Wall-E.
Watching Nausicaä and Castle in the Sky felt very refreshing, it just really felt like a different level of movie compared to most other animation movies.
But i would also love seeing the Devonian era fish theme from Ponyo done in a live action movie. There are many inspiring aspects in his movies, but to translate those to CGI and live action would require a very big budget and a lot of serious devotion from all the writers, actors, directors, designers and casting and all. And even then would the movie probably not be received well, unless it overcomes the bias odds of selling out to live action, betraying his animation past or whatever people can find to shoot it down for.
But yes, i would say No to remakes in general too, i enjoy tributes just as much, if it is acknowledged that its inspiration comes from the good oldies, nothing wrong with that, but there is just no need to remake something that is already this good.
The Matrix is probably one of the biggest rip offs in Hollywood sharing almost every main aspect with Nausicaä, to name a few bigger ones: Nausicaä the hero from prophecy -> Neo the hero from prophecy, Lord Yupa -> Morpheus Obaba -> Oracle control over wind -> control over matrix, Ohms (with red eyes) -> flying squid-like machines (with red eyes), Valley -> Zion, people from the Valley -> people from Zion, people outside of Valley -> agents and higher machines, forest -> mankind, glowing golden fields that one of the main characters, blinded, can't really see but know they are there -> machines that appear to blinded main character as golden glow so he could know they are there, tentacles raise and revive nausicaä -> tentacles raise but don't revive neo...
So you can pretty much take The Matrix as a remake of Nausicaä. Is it really awesome? Yes. Is it nearly as good as Nausicaä? Not even close.
Avatar (which looks like a fusion rip off of Nausicaä, Mononoke, Dances With the Wolfs and Pocahontas) is really good and it wouldn't be what it is without Mr. Miyazaki. James Cameron said himself that he is a big fan of Miyazaki and that Nausicaä is his favourite movie.
"Watching Nausicaä and Castle in the Sky felt very refreshing, it just really felt like a different level of movie compared to most other animation movies."
Absolutely! And same goes for every Miyazaki movie (and probably any Ghibli movie as well) and I don't see any way someone can remake those movies to be better than they already are - pure perfection.
i was 15 when the Matrix came out, it became my favorite Sci-Fi, because it was dark and had a deeper meaning to it than most other Hollywood movies. Too bad it became such a hype and didn't improve as the Trilogy progressed. I wouldn't really have called it a rip-off either because it felt original at the time. Now when i look back on it, it is still a good movie with a cool concept, it is no longer my favorite but its still in my Sci-Fi top 10 probably.
Initially i compared a lot of the Matrix to Ghost in the Shell, but the similarities in some of the Matrix points you made are spot on as to how i felt as well, i only saw Nausicaä for the first time in November last year, which made me wish i had seen Miyazaki movies when i was a kid. But the first thing that opened my eyes were the Ohm which made me think of the Sentinels (squidbots) in Matrix, then i noticed Yupa searching for "the One" like Morpheus did, the Valley acting like Zion etc.
Personally i thought the Forest was more like Machine City, but yeah you can take apart any movie this way, to be honest, the storytelling in Nausicaä is not totally original itself either, i'm sure that it is based on older traditional stories or books. But there is no doubt that Miyazaki's way of putting it to the screen was a great building block and inspiration for future movies, like you said Cameron himself even says that he loves Miyazaki's work.
I still haven't seen Dances with Wolves, but Avatar did feel like Nausicaä, Mononoke, Pocahontas and a bit of Fantastic Planet, also the Tree of Souls really made me think of Castle in the Sky. It is also hard to make an animation movie into a live action one, because animation movies tend to be more fairytale-like, which could make some people think that they're watching a kids movie instead.
Nitpicking: • Avatar did the colorful world really well like Nausicaä and Laputa, but the story wasn't good enough. • Matrix did dark themes and story well, eerie surrealism like the God Warrior in Nausicaä, but focused too much on action. • Alice and Oz had nice effects, but by being fairytales, tended to be too sweet, maybe they're more close to Totoro. • Neverending Story was "grim and gritty" like Mononoke or Nausicaä but eventually without guts. • Lord of the Rings was big and pretty, but too much traditional Fantasy, missing the Alien-like insect influences. • Hellboy II had good Steampunk and Alien-like character designs, but it lacked depth.
Obviously not every Miyazaki movie is equal to the other, personally, as you could probably already notice, Nausicaä is my favorite with Castle in the Sky as a close second, i wish there would be a couple of movies coming up who use these themes gracefully, maybe Avatar 2, 3 & 4 might surprise us after all. I wonder if Avatar will take a more grittier approach, the Hollywood gloss makes it harder to accept deeper messages, like most people now just complain about Avatars' environmentalist undertone of it. Nausicaä made me care about the Ohm, while Avatar didn't have me rooting for the Na'vi's as much, i was mostly rooting for the Tree (Pun-intended).
I think im kinda losing my train of thought here :) i just love these movies and i wish to see a lot more of them in my lifetime, they are just these kind of movies that you connect with and stay with you
Your right Matrix is like Nausicaa/Ghost in the Shell/Star Wars/Blade Runner/Akira/DBZ/Fist of the North Star etc. remixed in one.
Same for Avatar being a combo of Dances with Wolves, Nausicaa, Mononoke, Castle in The Sky, Man Called Horse, Nightbreed, Fantastic Planet, Gandahar aka Lightyears, Pocahontas, Dune, Lawrence of Arabia etc.