Picture a series of movies about Willie Scott or Short Round, with Temple of Doom one of them.
Imagine Willie Scott is the protagonist of Willie Scott and the Temple of Doom, who by a twist of fate gets involved in a terrifying series of adventures and dangers that pretty much ruin her life and seem very likely to end it. She can blame Indian Jones for it without being too unfair, thinking that he kidnapped her and put her in constant danger and discomfort. It would not be too unfair for her to blame Indy for everything terrible or disgusting that happens to her. So if she thinks of Indy as her kidnapper falling for him by the end of the movie could be considered a type of Stockholm syndrome behavior.
So a protagonist who complains about their troubles to the one who sort of kidnapped them seems reasonable to me.
IMHO the audience is supposed to have two conflicting and yet simultaneous reactions to Willie Scott, to agree with Indy and Short Round's annoyance at her screaming and complaining and also to sympathize with her suffering.
Now consider Temple of Doom with Short Round as the protagonist and action hero, not too different from the actual movie. Shorty lived a normal life until his family was killed in a Japanese attack, and lived as a street orphan until he found a new home with Indy and Wu Han. Then Wu Han was killed and Shorty fled with Indy and a stranger into a series of one deadly danger after another, helping his friend Indy and the stranger Willie escape from each deadly peril.
I read a review that described Short Round as adorable. I didn't think that Short Round seemed adorable. Short Round seemed too busy yelling and screaming in terror and fighting to be adorable. But that is the fault of the villains who kept putting Shorty and others in deadly danger. When things were peaceful and quiet Shorty seemed like a nice enough kid.
reply
share