Forget 'Gigantis the Fire Monster', forget 'Godzilla vs Mothra,' forget all that Godzilla-friend-to-man crap. THIS is the real sequel to the original 'Godzilla,' carrying on the legendary monster's name as a TRUE monster. This goes back to the Big G's roots, making him the same Tsunami, Earthquake, Tornado force of nature that he started his film life as. It puzzles me why a lot of really hard-core Godzilla fans don't like this film.
The original Japanese version of this movie is excellent, though, in my opinion the second best Godzilla movie ever made. It's the only film that retains the serious tone of the first film, and it feels far more realistic as a result. Also, this movie features my favorite incarnation of Godzilla ever - he looks so evil with those new eyes and the fangs.
I'd agree, with that. I didn't get to see it in the theatres, but I did get to view the 1954 original and Godzilla 1985 one evening when I was visiting my grandparents. I remember I called back to my other set of grandparents and asked them to record the All-Star game, for me, because Godzilla is best watched live and free.
Personally, I thought it was kind of cool that Mr. Burr reprised his role in this one. He was a pretty big star by then and didn't need the work. He did it for fun and for continuity. I respect that. Too bad he wasn't around for Godzilla 2000. Did anyone else find his character's name rather humorous? Steve Martin. "A giant radioactive lizard? Well, excuuuuuuuuuuuse me!"
I think Rasputin put it best when he said, "Man, those pastries gave me indigestion."
Yeah, but his character name of Steve Martin DID predate the fame of the comic Steve Martin. In 'Hollywood Dinosaurs', the narrator mentions him as 'Raymond Burr, playing reporter Steve Martin. Or, maybe it was Steve Martin, playing reporter Raymond Burr.'
The big tragedy is that he wound up in one of the worst American chop jobs on any Godzilla film. Those scenes in G85 looked even more tacked-on than the American scenes in GKOM. Maybe it was the blatant Dr. Pepper product plugs....
Most giant monster films have that camp quality to them, but you have to be good to be really bad. Totall bullshot movies just aren't good enough to be bad.
Not really. Godzilla 1954 is the start of the Showa series of Godzilla films, from '54 to '75. Godzilla 1985 is the start of the Heisei series of Godzilla films from '84 to '95 and Godzilla 2000 doesn't really have a spin-off since every film in that series bar one are direct sequels to the original.
A better way to look at is every Godzilla film except Godzilla '54 is a sequel.
Godzilla, mothra, King Ghidorah:Giant monsters all out attack is more of a sequel to the first then this one. Im interested in seeing the original Uncut version of this film. Infact my goal is to view all the Godzilla movies that were cut in there uncut japanese version. i jsut recently got the Godzilla Raids Again film in its original Japanese version and it is good and they dont get Godzillas roar mixed up with Angilis
I have to agree that this film comes the closest and truest to a first Godzilla sequel than any other Godzilla film in any of the film series. The suspense of the government officials to the media's reaction in the possibility of Godzilla' resurrection is great comprehension that you would come to expect and look for in a first Godzilla sequel. It all leads to this: Godzilla is coming back after 30 years? All the tense emotions from the human characters ties in to the great monster's comeback.
"Godzilla Raids Again" was OK as a first sequel. It introduced the Godzilla that would later become the "Defender of Earth" and the first Godzilla foe: Anguirus. "Godzilla X Mechaguirus" was supposed to be made as a direct sequel to the original "Godzilla." But, this film centralizes too much in the human characters. The plot of how the female lead tries to avenge her commander's death should NOT be the main focus in a Godzilla sequel; a first sequel should concentrate on Godzilla himself and nothing else. And come on, a dragonfly appearing in Godzilla's direct sequel? Also, "GMK" was a joke as a "first" sequel. The scene where the two reporters were broadcasting Godzilla and Baragon's battle like it was a boxing match was just utterly ridiculous. This, among other scenes, should not be expected in a direct Godzilla sequel (my sincere apologies to the people who like this movie). GMK is fine as a Godzilla film, but not as "the" sequel. Like "Godzilla X Mechaguirus," "GMK" focuses on revenge, not Godzilla.
"Godzilla X Mechagodzilla" is also said to be made as a direct sequel to "Godzilla." That film turned out pretty good, but lacks the depth and suspense of "Godzilla 1985." This film basically mentioned that Godzilla has somebody mysteriously came back after his first attach in 1954. There were no suspense built-up, unlike "Godzilla 1985." Again, this movie focused on revenge again, and not Godzilla. But, the sub-plot of Mechagodzilla being created by the bones of the original Godzilla was pretty interesting.
Overall, I think the Heisei series, which started with "Godzilla 1985," is the best series in terms of continuity, depth and story-line.
I am watching the American version right now. I haven't watched the Godzilla series of movies for decades now. This movie is bringing back fond memories of staying up all night to watch Godzilla marathons with my family and later when I moved out on my own the odd moments I could sit back with a big bowl of popcorn and watch Godzilla on cable. They are very true to the source material as far as I can tell. I hope this comes out on DVD soon.