Punky's Treehouse


I was wondering how Punky and Henry could have even built the treehouse becuz they lived in an apartment building. The apartment building belongs to the city, and even though Henry was the manager of the apartment building but it still wasnt his. you cant rent an apartment and build your own treehouse on the land and property of the apartment building lol. You'd have to get city permission and permits and stuff. and even if a treehouse was built on the property of the apartment building, it wouldnt just be Punky's or decorated only the way she wanted it done. the treehouse would have been the property of the city and apartment and all the tenants there too. so Punky and Henry wouldnt have been able to build the treehouse themselves any way they want it, on any day they wanted to, in any location they wanted on the apartment's property.

reply

Well, Punky and Henry lived in inner city Chicago, didn't they? I really don't think anyone was much concerned with a treehouse -- considering all the bullets and crack cocaine the Punk probably witnessed daily.

reply

oh puhlease. gimme a break. i bring up one decent observation and all i get is a troll with a stupid remark that doesnt have anything to do with what this thread is about. actually your post doesnt have anything to do with the show either. Just cuz Punky and everyone lived in Chicago, but the show wasnt ABOUT crime and drugs and gangs and crap. They didnt show punky going out in the city everyday fighting bullets and stuff. But they did show Punky and her treehouse alot. so her treehouse was still a big part of the show, which is why i brought up the observation. but the show didnt focus on and wasnt about crime in Chicago. they only did 2 episodes "Urban fear" about a stalker in chicago and "Just say no" about kids not doing drugs. but the crime in chicago wasnt what the show was about, but her treehouse did have a major role in the show.

besides you could say the same thing about every city a show is set in about who cares about the characters, cuz of the crime in the city. if you think that way about punky, you could think that way about every show on tv, especially now. besides it doesnt matter what crime is going on in the city, you cant rent an apartment and build your own treehouse there! even if a city does have crime, there is still other laws like not building your own stuff on city property that you cant do and the city still cares about.

of course this is just a childrens tv show and its not always realistic, but everyone else is making observations for the fun of talking about the show, so i mentioned one that no one else has brought up yet.

reply

You bring up a good point with a renter not being able to build on someone else's property. If that were allowed, I'd have done it years ago! It was revealed in the 4th season, though, that Margeaux's dad actually owned the property, so maybe that's why they got away with it. Even if someone else (not the city, but a property owner) owned the property during season 2 when the treehouse was built, Henry, as manager, may have been friendly enough with the owner that it would have been permitted.

reply

valid point if this was reality. but its televion. hate to disapoint you.

reply

[deleted]


When I was a kid in the 80's, family sitcoms like the Cosbys, Family Ties or Mr Belvedere looked very realistic to me, in fact so damn "real" that I thought they were boring and preferred cartoons. Nonetheless, looking back and analyzing it, certain things in these shows weren't realistic. For one thing, most families, even in the 80's, weren't all that quirky and cute. It was cute and almost 50's ish, which isn't realistic. Families are complex, diverse and are also full of arguments/fights. In these shows I don't remember anyone ever really getting into nasty verbal fights.

Punky remained very realistic for the most part but I thought that the episode with the Chicklet girls was unrealistic. It was an episode meant to cause drug abuse awarness (that is telling kids "say no to drugs" which was what I was told in the 80's as a kid) but those girls were at most age 12 or 13 - and taking drugs ? LOL First of all, they were very pretty, well-dressed middle class girls who did not appear to be those typical drug-users in the 80's which were "punk" rockers, Goth, etc, and even those types were already full-fledged teenagers ages 15, 16 and 17. They offered drugs to Punky and Sherry and it was not realistic. LOL

When I was a kid no other kid my age or even 3 years older than me ever took drugs. The first time I saw anyone taking drugs was in high school (and if they were caught they were arrested) but by then I was already ages 17 and 18. Teenagers, not pre-teens were taking drugs in the 80's and if kids were taking drugs then damn, what a terrible thing LOL Just glad Punky listened to Ronnie Reagan and said no LOL

reply

[deleted]


What school was that ? LOL I went to an elementary school and middle school in a poor, working class LA area and no one offered me drugs. No one was taking drugs. I think my particular "group" had been hypnotized "say no to drugs" "say no to drugs" and we were afraid of drugs and thought it would kills us LOl Drugs was another word for "deadly poison".

I listened to Ronnie Reagan and also George Bush Senior and Barbara Bush and never took drugs, not even later on in the late 90's when I was already 18. I knew some high school students who were taking them but they were never among my "social circle" or "friends". They were the radical Goths who listened to weird alternative music. In the 80's, I did know older high school students because one of my neighbors was already 16 in 1986 and her mother would always check if she came home both "sober" (no alcohol) and or investigated if she was taking drugs.

I'm surprised that even in the 80's little kids were exposed to drugs. I really have this nostalgic, pretty romanticized view of the 80's because I had a really nice childhood.

reply

[deleted]

didn't they all move to another building? i dunno if that makes a difference...but yeah

reply