Plot holes
If the wrong guy was on death row, couldn't it be proven? I know they didn't have DNA testing back then, but isn't there some way the guy who was convicted have been ruled out if there was semen found? What about the hammer (murder weapon)? Did the killer take it with him? Fingerprints? The only evidence was the little girl said it was him. That's not enough.
Why would her babysitters leave a little girl alone (even for a few minutes) in a house at night who witnessed her mother raped and murdered only 2 years earlier, just so they could get to their *beep* movie on time?! Even though she said it was okay, why would anyone do that?
Why would her father leave her with a known alcoholic(the neighbour's noticed him sneaking a drink outside his house through their window)?
This movie has too many stupid storylines that ruin the overall effect.