E.T. and Close Encounters - Overrated, or am I just missing something?
It's not that I don't like Steven Spielberg. In fact Jaws and the first three Indiana Jones movies easily make my top ten greatest movies ever list. Moreover, I admire the way he's kept himself grounded throughout all his success. By and large, he's never taken the path so many other 'important' directors take after initial success to produce boring, 'artistic,' vanity-project films that no one wants to see (looking in your direction, Robert Redford, Robert Altman and Stanley Kubrick). Even after all these years and some of the most successful movies in history, Spielberg still acts like he's working for us.
And I don't think E.T. or Close Encounters were horrible movies. Just that I've never quite understood why so many think that either is particularly special - especially for a Spielberg film. To me, E.T. was about a friendly alien who gets stranded on earth, dies for no apparent reason, comes back to life for no apparent reason, and builds an elaborate interstellar 'phone' to call his people to come back for him - even though you would kind of expect creatures intelligent enough to build interstellar crafts would eventually figure out they left someone behind and come back for him anyway. And to me Close Encounters is about UFOs and the government secretly being aware of their existence.
In other words, could someone explain to me why - minus the million-dollar special effects - E.T. is anything more than a luke-warm after-school special; and Close Encounters is anything more than a mediocre first-season episode of the X-Files?