MovieChat Forums > Alone in the Dark (1982) Discussion > The Ending (spoilers, of course)

The Ending (spoilers, of course)


The ending was confusing to me. It left me feeling like I missed something in the movie. When Frank goes into the club, a woman says she saw him there on Tuesday. Was Frank just having another paranoid fantasy?

Plus, it was a little strange that out of all the places in town he could wonder to, Frank wanders into the same club that Dr. Potter, his wife, and his sister go to earlier in the movie. Does anyone care to share their opinions on that? Or was it an utter coincidence that Frank stumbles in there?

Thanks everyone!

reply

[deleted]

Thanks for sharing your opinion. I appreciate your response!

reply

[deleted]

The girl was seriously wasted. She probably thinks she saw me in there last Tuesday, too. The point is that Frank has found himself a home in the punk club. That's why I love the ending so much.

Death is...whimsical today.

reply

Thank you for commenting!

reply

Wow, first time anyone ever thanked me for commenting. You're very welcome.

Death is...whimsical today.

reply

Or...in the scene where they are back at the hospital doing the head count, and the nurse says six are still missing and asked if anyone has seen "Sunshine". Maybe the girl in the club was "Sunshine", so maybe she DID see Frank on Tuesday. Just a thought.

reply

Or...in the scene where they are back at the hospital doing the head count, and the nurse says six are still missing and asked if anyone has seen "Sunshine". Maybe the girl in the club was "Sunshine", so maybe she DID see Frank on Tuesday. Just a thought.



I like that explanation!




Dolls and kisses and crosses and wishes- Emily Rose

reply

That is a cool thought, and one I never figured on my own. But mostly, it looks to me that Palance does, in fact, stumble in there by coincidence. Also, it seems to me that he came to a place of maniacs, drugged out nihilistic punk rockers, and the girl that approached him just happened to be one of them. So in a sense, being a deranged, disillusioned Vietnam vet/misfit, he finds his place in a way.

"All humans are fools to some extent. At least, I'm a clever one." - me

reply

Yes, one4now4, this is how I saw the ending, with his playfully pointing the gun to the girl's smiling face. Remember he also beats the poor (albeit obnoxious) doorman to the club and gets cheered for it by the crowd. This is a ruleless, chaotic, violent world wherein a psychotic, murderous, escaped mental patient fits right in. It's also the exact opposite reaction experienced earlier by the "normal" Dr. Potter but closer to that of Toni, the half-crazy sister. It's all a little clunky, but I do appreciate the effort made to have a social subtext underlying the conventional horror -- especially since it was Sholder's directorial debut.

reply

This is a ruleless, chaotic, violent world wherein a psychotic, murderous, escaped mental patient fits right in.


When it comes to a liberal low class degenerate trash world, of which the punk subculture is a subset, then yes, he certainly fits right in. The doctor, who is a family man and lives like a human being as opposed to a drug-addled, sexually confused, cultureless liberal freak, is naturally turned off by such societal filth.

--
"Den Gleichen Gleiches, den Ungleichen Ungleiches."

reply

Storywise, the whole movie seems to literally skip some plot points. What happened to doctor (Donald)? Did they actually kill him? Is Landau dead or just incapacitated? How the hell did "Tom Smith" know where the doctor's wife and sister would be, since he split from the "crew"? Why did he help them only to switch sides? How the HELL did Potter, his personal f-ing doctor, not know how Skaggs looks like? Why did they let the girl live? Why didn't they go after the family during the first night of the blackout? How did the cops miss the two bodies in the closet (bodies smell and bleed if nothing else, did the killers wipe all the blood)?

Also, characterwise, the movie barely uses its characters' characteristics.
The kid was set up as a smartass character but the plot never uses her overage smarts. The doctors do not use psychology to "fight" the loonies (plus Pleasence goes "high" himself) and when Donald tries the Commandments against a preacher that doesn't work. Palance does nothing in the whole movie. He is suppose to be a tactician, yet his only action (that wasn't a consequence of outside events) was to randomly kill a postman because Landau just must be a postman to check out the house (although they can in fact get in and out as they please).
And the sister is nuts? Where did they take that plotline? Nowhere.

Despite all that, I like the movie, but if it had more scenes of madness taking over (like the diner scene or the scene with the sister and the zombie) this would have been a much better movie.

The ending could be a smart twist (like the other users suggested) but it could also be just a "oh no, the killer is loose and nobody sees it" thing. It's original but even so, the film could have used more ending. :)

reply

Some of this was skipped, or not fully shown or explained, however most of it was not integral to the plot imo. Whether or not the doctor (Donald) was actually killed or just injured - who cares? If he lived, great. If he didn't, add him to the body count. Doesn't change the movie either way. Landau appears to be dead, he doesn't make any more noise after being stabbed and thrown down the cellar, but I agree that knife with which he was stabbed didn't look up to the job. However he is not heard from again, so we can assume he must be dead. "Tom Smith" meeting up with the wife and sister is a serious stretch, I give you that one. How would he know who they are, and to meet them at a protest rally? We never see anything indicating how this could come about. As for why he helped and then switched, we know he is unstable, so trying to rationalize his behavior is a losing effort. Potter not knowing what he looked like we already know - he always hid his face when Potter came in the room. Why he didn't hide his face later in public, like at the protest - that's a bigger issue/plot hole. Letting the girl live - again, not integral to the plot but a fair question. The rapist seemed surprised at the girl's lack of fear. Maybe he thrived on fear and when she didn't show it, his rapist instinct didn't kick in. Who knows. First night of the blackout they raided the store and stole the van (and killed a guy in the parking lot). Maybe they wanted to lay low after that. The two bodies in the closet - I don't think the bodies would smell so soon (a few hours). I'm not sure how much blood there was, I thought one if not both of them were strangled.

Speaking of shoddy police work, I have a bigger problem with the cops not realizing that Tom Smith was an escaped mental patient. They should have booked everyone at the station and ran fingerprint/identity checks...how would he not have turned up in their database? He was supposedly an infamous serial killer a few years back. That one doesn't make much sense.

As for the smartass kid, I was glad for that. Home Alone was lame enough, we don't need another pre-teen running around outsmarting everyone. The escapees not responding to Donald and the random messenger killing...again, you can't rationalize their actions. Why did they kill the guy in the parking lot? No reason for that either, but they did. The sister being nuts added to the tension for me, because we don't quite know what happened to her. If she relapses, what is that like? Will she just retreat into a corner, or will she grab a pair of scissors and go nuts herself? So that part of the plot was effective for me, what would she do if she went over the edge?

I too thought it was pretty good. I would have liked it even better if Doctor Donald turned out to be just as nuts and either joined the others or popped up at the end and took out Potter before the credits rolled, that would have been classic!

reply