This film in many ways is a percursor to "Heat". I like to think of it as "Heat" without the police element. Certain scenes are very similar (like the scene where Caan gets pulled over), not just because of Michael Mann's style of writing/directing, but I think in such a way that he was always trying to make a film like "Heat," but didn't get it exactly as he wished until 1995. In that regard you're right. From wanting to cast William L. Petersen in "Heat" before switching to do "Manhunter," to doing it as the TV movie "L.A. Takedown," it just seems like Mann had been trying for a long time to make "Heat" and "Thief" was the first stepping stone, both towards that project and towards being a successful director.
That said, I think both films have a lot of things going for it and I enjoy "Thief" just as much as "Heat." James Caan I think is a wonderful actor who was very believable at playing tough, yet principled, yet still flawed good guys, and really devious despicable bad guys. His role in "Thief" definitely struck me as one of his best, if not THE best, performances of his life. He plays his emotions so well, and makes it all work. The man has different sides to him. He can be a compassionate and caring man capable of sensitivity and romance (I thought his relationship with Tuesday Weld was very believable and touching, from what he says to her in the coffee shop to convince her to be with him, to the scene where he tells her what he does...which I thought was hilarious, and shows his principles as well, because Willie Nelson told him, "Lie to no one."), but he's also cold and methodical. That scene where he tells her to leave him and get out of his life...that's such a great scene because it shows how much he loves her, but more than that it shows how deep his principles run.
Remember what Robert Prosky said to him, "You're not that guy anymore." He could not allow himself to be controlled, so he had to become that guy again, and that meant turning away anything and everything he had built up that could hold him back. The only way he could really get back his life is if he destroyed it. There's few things more dangerous than a man with nothing to lose. His friends were dead, his freedom was gone already, he had to remove everything. His wife, his child, his business, everything. That's why I think that scene is so powerful because in his facial expression alone, as cold as he is, you can tell that he is doing the most painful thing he can think of, and the most determined.
If a comparison there must be made to "Heat," "Have no attachments, have nothing in your life that you can not turn your back on in 30 seconds flat if you spot the heat around the corner." The heat was on for Caan in this film, and I think the end shootout, as cliche as it might seem to end a film with a shootout, it is one of the most believable and one of the most logical (how else could it end?).
I can't tell you to like this film. I'm not much good at convincing and persuasion. I can only give my opinion of the film and hope that someone takes it to heart when considering their own opinions. In all honesty, some scenes did bore me, at least the first time around. But I watched it quite a few more times, and I can honestly say the film holds as much for me as "Heat" does. I think "Thief" is a good film. But that's me.
Note: Remember what Jon Voight said in "Heat" to Robert DeNiro when he was telling him about Pacino. "He took down Frank's crew in Chicago." Interesting connection. Makes one wonder what happened to him after he survived in "Thief."
reply
share