MovieChat Forums > Prince of the City (1981) Discussion > Why did Santimassino check off Dan’s nam...

Why did Santimassino check off Dan’s name?


After their first meeting, Santimassino goes to a list of cops, including Levy & Mascone, & checks off Dan’s name. I took this to mean he was adding Dan to a list of cops he thought were crooked & intended to indict. He’d already formed an opinion of Ciello while putting together targets for his anti-corruption operation (“I’ve been studying Det. Ciello’s file very closely”) and had probably already tagged him as corrupt. There's a shot of him looking at Ciello intently--he's very interested in this guy, but as a target--not as the colleague Rick & Brooks see him as. The interview allowed Santimassino to confirm his suspicions. All he needed to hear was Dan’s flexible attitude towards law enforcement:

Dan: We don’t like to make too many arrests during the holidays. Nobody wants to put people in jail at Easter.
Santimassino (smiling indulgently): It’s a little different on the federal side.

Compared with his own rigidity, Santimassino would see that laxness as an indication of corruption. That was all he needed to add Dan to his list.

Other thoughts?

reply

I took it to mean that Ciello was just one more cop cooperating with him.

reply

But Levy's & Mascone's names were checked, & they weren't cooperating.

reply

Maybe it meant he knew the ones that were corrupt and after meeting them decided upon which would eventually fold and which ones wouldn't. Maybe he had not got to Levey or Cielo's rabbi, or if he did, maybe he could tell they would never inform.

reply

Slightly off topic but I thought Santimassino might have been the oddest character in the large cast. Have you even seen an Italo prosecutor look like that guy, as well as dress (with a bow tie?)and speak as oddly.


reply

I haven't seen many prosecutors, period; but it's true he does seem a bit of a clotheshorse. He obviously has some big connections and thinks of himself as important. "I myself will be spending a great deal of time in New York." Wow! You? Yourself? Gosh!

I thought Bob Balaban did a marvelous job with this characterization.



We report, you decide; but we decide what to report.

reply

pninson wrote,
' I haven't seen many prosecutors, period; but it's true he does seem a bit of a clotheshorse. He obviously has some big connections and thinks of himself as important. "I myself will be spending a great deal of time in New York." Wow! You? Yourself? Gosh!
I thought Bob Balaban did a marvelous job with this characterization. '


nothing to add just to say the ' wow! ... gosh! ' gave me a good laugh - thanks

reply