Exploding Heads!


Anyone else find that the exploding heads thing was terribly amusing after the first time? :P

reply

Anyone else feel that this Hollywood cliché has already outlived it's day?

reply

I dunno...

...with the release of 'Sunshine' later this year I'm sure they'll be able to squeeze in a few more exploding heads :D.

reply

While I'm sure it was done before this was the first film I recall seeing where people's heads exploded in a vacuum. Not very realistic though as the pressure difference between normal air and a vacuum is only one atmosphere, I still think it is a good film though.

I'm only going to say this once: stay out of Camberwick Green - Sam Tyler

reply

I´ve read, if people are exposed to vacuum they would get quasily freeze dried, because their cell walls would breake and the water would leave the cells and the skin.


"Hooters, hooters, yum yum yum,
Hooters, hooters, on a girl that´s dumb!"
The Bundy credo

reply

Cell walls are not that fragile.

For the lowdown, look to the experts on the subject:
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970603.html

reply

Thank you. Very interesting.

"Hooters, hooters, yum yum yum,
Hooters, hooters, on a girl that´s dumb!"
The Bundy credo

reply

Exploding heads are always terribly amusing.



YOU MUST BE THIS DEAD TO RIDE

reply

In reality, if the outside temperature is 175 below like one of the miners said, a body would crystallize into solid ice within a fraction of a second--as if they just got liquid oxygen poured on them. But to hell with science, man I really DIG exploding heads!!!

reply

Taken from a NASA web site

The Question
(Submitted June 03, 1997)

How would the unprotected human body react to the vacuum of outer space? Would it inflate to bursting? or would it not? or would just the interior gases hyperinflate? We are also relating this to short-term exposure only. This question primarily relates to the pressure differential problems. Temperature or radiation considerations would be interesting as well.

The question arose out of a discussion of the movie 2001. When Dave "blew" himself into the airlock from the pod without a helmet, should he have "blown up" or is there "no difference" as shown in the movie correct?


The Answer
From the now extinct page http://medlib/jsc.nasa.gov/intro/vacuum.html:

How long can a human live unprotected in space?

If you don't try to hold your breath, exposure to space for half a minute or so is unlikely to produce permanent injury. Holding your breath is likely to damage your lungs, something scuba divers have to watch out for when ascending, and you'll have eardrum trouble if your Eustachian tubes are badly plugged up, but theory predicts -- and animal experiments confirm -- that otherwise, exposure to vacuum causes no immediate injury. You do not explode. Your blood does not boil. You do not freeze. You do not instantly lose consciousness.

Various minor problems (sunburn, possibly "the bends", certainly some [mild, reversible, painless] swelling of skin and underlying tissue) start after ten seconds or so. At some point you lose consciousness from lack of oxygen. Injuries accumulate. After perhaps one or two minutes, you're dying. The limits are not really known.

You do not explode and your blood does not boil because of the containing effect of your skin and circulatory system. You do not instantly freeze because, although the space environment is typically very cold, heat does not transfer away from a body quickly. Loss of consciousness occurs only after the body has depleted the supply of oxygen in the blood. If your skin is exposed to direct sunlight without any protection from its intense ultraviolet radiation, you can get a very bad sunburn.

At NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center (now renamed Johnson Space Center) we had a test subject accidentally exposed to a near vacuum (less than 1 psi) in an incident involving a leaking space suit in a vacuum chamber back in '65. He remained conscious for about 14 seconds, which is about the time it takes for O2 deprived blood to go from the lungs to the brain. The suit probably did not reach a hard vacuum, and we began repressurizing the chamber within 15 seconds. The subject regained consciousness at around 15,000 feet equivalent altitude. The subject later reported that he could feel and hear the air leaking out, and his last conscious memory was of the water on his tongue beginning to boil.

Aviation Week and Space Technology (02/13/95) printed a letter by Leonard Gordon which reported another vacuum-packed anecdote:

"The experiment of exposing an unpressurized hand to near vacuum for a significant time while the pilot went about his business occurred in real life on Aug. 16, 1960. Joe Kittinger, during his ascent to 102,800 ft (19.5 miles) in an open gondola, lost pressurization of his right hand. He decided to continue the mission, and the hand became painful and useless as you would expect. However, once back to lower altitudes following his record-breaking parachute jump, the hand returned to normal."

reply

Whaaaaat?? You mean Hollywood led us to believe something that isn't true??

What is this world coming to?

reply

Exploding heads make good cinema.

reply

Especially ones that quadruple in size before exploding like jelly doughnuts.

Anarchy's coming to town. A firey invader.

reply

if the outside temperature is 175 below like one of the miners said

Damn , kids those days dont learn *beep* in school.
There is no temperature in space, since there is no medium for the heat to travel in ...
Space is actually pretty warm, with all that cosmic radiation solar winds and your own body heat you will boil faster than you will start loosing your heat.

But yeah, every time a head exploded in this movie it made me cringe. So stupid.

reply

There is no temperature in space, since there is no medium for the heat to travel in ...
Space is actually pretty warm


I'm confused. Which is it?

reply

Both in a way, vacuum itself has no temperature so be being "neutral" it already feels like summer day. But still you will gain heat from other sources that are negligible on earth, like cosmic radiation or the mentioned solar winds when not protected properly.

So while vacuum might have no temperature, it will feel very warm, just because we are used to air stealing our heat on earth, and with the lack of that we will automatically think of it as being in a warm place.

reply

Interesting. But if there's no medium for heat to travel in how do you feel the heat from cosmic radiation, solar wind, etc?

reply

Electromagnetic radiation dosnt need medium thanks to its wave particle duality, that is it is at the same time both a wave and made up of particles called photons, and can be its own medium. Or its just one of the unexplained qualities of spacetime, this is quantum physics stuff so gotta ask a specialist on that.

Anyway, not all heat transfer consists of kinetic energy exchange between particles just most of it, at lest on earth where earth electromagnetic field protects us from most of suns and universes radiation. But in space without that protection its a different matter, depending on where you were you could ether fry or just slowly get cancer or die of radiation sickness.

reply

Exploding heads are more likely to happen to a deep sea diver, but the environment on IO might be cause a similar reaction.

Listen, do you smell something? -Ray Stantz

reply

The people who got sucked outside on Mars in Total Recall had it better.

reply

Total Recall spoiler:
Only because Quaid thought it was that way. According to the director, the entire film after he visited Rekall was his own construct based on the secret agent ego trip they implanted. He ends up getting lobo'ed at the end...just as he was told would happen by the Rekall director who visits his "Ego Trip". So how things operate in reality are totally irrelevant.

Of course, the ending is purposely shot to leave things ambiguous...but that is the canon explanation in his commentary.

reply