Did you know that Vincent Van didn't want to have a nude sex scene with Suki? There was one in the script and he didn't like her so he nixed it....this is on the Anchor Bay DVD commentary.
Crazy, huh?
Damn, the only thing missing from this 80's horror gem was a little nudity...that bastard! She was hot too...
shareI remember reading an interview years ago that said Barton was uptight during the filming and was too worried about his family's reputation to do nudity. I have no idea who his family is, but I don't know why he was so stodgy. It's not like this was a first class picture anyway, no need to class it up.
shareSounds like he was hiding the fact that he’s gay.
shareNo nudity is one of the positives about this, and minimal cussing.
________
bit.ly/147IATS
What?
www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com
www.thecultofhorror.tumblr.com
What didn't you understand about my comment?
________
bit.ly/147IATS
The What most likely regards your asinine assertion that two hallmarks of classic horror flicks [nudity and swearing] made it a better product; when it never does.
share
Nudity definitely wouldn't have hurt, but the film was still pretty good even without it.
Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Criedshare
Then just watch G-rated films.
Or are you one of those guys who gets boners at women being tortured, mutilated and murdered, but bare boobs give you the creeps?
Really? Didn't know that. Seems weird they wouldn't just cast someone else in the role though
Death Awaits (Horror forum)
http://w11.zetaboards.com/Death_Awaits/index/
If that's true, I curse Vincent Van. Suki was so majorly hot that I was really looking forward to seeing her titties.
Poorly Lived and Poorly Died, Poorly Buried and No One Criedshare