Riuned by geeks?
I'm a bit of a jerk for posting this...
Does anyone feel like The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy has been ruined by geeks? I mean, the book is pretty deep...so much so that Richard Dawkins cited Douglas Adams as an instrumental mind towards the popularization of science. Unfortunately, I feel like his pinnacle work has been reduced to the number "42."
I mean...alot of brilliance has been reduced to one liners..."42" being the most oft cited. There are alot of keen things going on in this book: condemnations of beuracracy, the abstraction of animals, and literary elitism (bogon poetry.) Unfortunately, it's been taken over by a bunch of idiots who can only run around repeating "don't panic" and "42."
I experienced a key example of this a month ago. I asked if Douglas Adams wrote any non fiction; if so, I said, it's probably pretty interesting. Without skipping a beat, a pudgy and kind of stinky guy sitting next to me answered "he did! The Hitch Hiker's Guide To the Galaxy!" I sighed and only blamed myself; I shouldn't have even brought it up. It's all been ruined by the same imbiciles who have ruined Monty Python by saying "knee" ever fives seconds and and all but raped HP Lovecraft of all his cosmological insight with their stupid Cuthulu stuffed animals. Don't even get me started on what they've done to Star Trek.
Oh, and please don't confuse Geek with Nerd. The Nerd is the intelligent guy who graduated college while the geek played pokemon.
Gene Roddenberry was a nerd. Kevin Sarbo fans are geeks.
Does anyone else even understand what I'm saying? Or am I just a jerk?