>> I could careless for historical accuracy
In this case, that's probably a good thing.
>> as long as the films are well made
Well made, you say... well, um, hmmph...
>> have a good plot
Er, uh, hmm, well, gee...
>> cinematography
Hmm, well, how to put this...
Yeah, um, no. I can't say Caligula really embodies any of the things you mention. In fact, in most every aspect of filmmaking, it's pretty much a train wreck.
It's also not to be missed.
Why? Because it just has this suicidal brilliance to it. One has to admire such a film because very few people would have the courage to even attempt something like it, and none would do it on the scale that Guccione, et. al. did. It is so screwy that it is more a rough assembly of footage than an actual narrative film, but you really get the sense that ancient Rome was very much like this -- not just the content of what we see, but the chaos of the entire enterprise itself.
I wouldn't want to live in a world where there were no films like Caligula.
reply
share