lot of problems-- not that good
i agree with colbau, it was sloppy
liked the first ten minutes, and this concept had SOOOO much potential. it just got lame as it went on. lazy writing. it could have been a lot more
on sloppiness-- they pointed a lot of things in the other post. but, i agree dropping in san francisco was cheese. (WTF?)
i started out intrigued as hell at the premise, and had a lot of expectations putting in the dvd. they just dropped the ball. it had a tv movie feel to it, and not a good one.
boring, really.
the suspense was lame, built around hg running here and there huunting the ripper, but the RIPPER WAS MORE INTERESTING so they shoulda shown more of him, more killing scenes, and done them more graphically.
okay, this next comment will only be understood by real film fans:
CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW GOOD IT WOULD'VE BEEN IF MICHAEL MANN HAD DIRECTED THIS IN THE MANNER OF MANHUNTER? OR FRIEDKIN DIRECTING IT?
yeah, great idea. it coulda been awesome.