what i got out of this flick is this: Don't string your girlfriend along! Rosenberg was too ambivalent about his girlfriend, he sat on his hands thinking she'd always be there, and she left him for a guy who moved faster. i know because this has happened to me many times!! you can't change dating rules and if you don't play by them you'll be assed out!!
Heh Heh Heh Heh!!
Are you sure you are not looking too much into this film because you are bitter from some personal problem?
I thought that it was just a comedy that made fun of the stereotypical version of Dracula by poseing opposites of his situations.
Such as the female lead not being a fainting religious innocent, but instead a sexual drug and alchohol obssesed model.
The Van Helsing character is not a genius and methodical, but ridiculous.
And no one in the film is afraid of Dracula at alltrue Rosenberg was "assed out" but I don't think that Cindy would have stayed with him anyway, they are too different .
Keep in mind that this was the mOvie that ruined "Dracula " starring Frank Langella, that was released at the same time, how could anyone be seduced by Frank Langella when George Hamilton was a " Yenta with skinny legs"?
[deleted]
How could Frank Langella's Dracula be ruined by Love at First Bite? (Or vice versa.) They may have approximately the same subject, but the handling is so different that I can't imagine anyone seeing the one and saying, "oh, now I don't need to see the other one." The vampire theme is a perennial favorite and continues to be made into books and movies. And as far as not being seduced by Langella after Hamilton's version...it's absurd. I loved both movies, though I didn't see them at the same time, and never even connected them in my mind.
shareI think it is also interesting how Dracula really isn't a bad guy, if you think about it and it wasn't bad for Cindy to succumb to him and become like him. In the present world, being so bad, maybe that life is better.
share[deleted]