MovieChat Forums > Laura, les ombres de l'été (1980) Discussion > Last scene - what is she thinking... (sp...

Last scene - what is she thinking... (spoiler)


When Paul is in the fountain and regains his vision...
You see Laura and Sarah standing still, and watching him.
A few seconds later you see Sarah hesitate while walking away, but Laura takes her hand and aparently doesn't want to wait...

I was wondering about two things:

1) What does Laura think?
She looks quite angry / disapointed at Paul when she leaves.

2) Has Paul totaly lost interest in Laura after finishing the statue?
Or is he so happy he can see again that he just doesn't notice Laura leaving?

reply

I think it was Sarah's impression that they had been intimate and Laura's expression of disappointment point in the direction that they hadn't. Paul ultimately became satisfied with finishing the statue and regaining his vision. It's weird. Throughout the movie, I was thinking he was interested in Laura as more than a model. I think everyone, including the others in the story, were under that impression, but, again, I think back to the scene where she goes to his studio and he finishes her scultpture. The scene is intertwined with a sequence where he takes off his goggles, can suddenly see her, and they're both having sex. Then, it all fades back to him sculpting her with his goggles on. After that, it cuts to her lying in his bed, nude, like the woman at the beginning of the movie (his promoter/girlfriend). You also have to take into account the conversation Paul and his girlfriend had. It leads me to think his only love interests are that woman and in creating a statue. Everything else is coming from Sarah and Laura (both willing to become intimate with him and fighting amongst themselves).


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

hmmm, could be an explanation!

But when she takes of his glasses, he doesn't look her in the eyes, but sort of stares straight ahead. So I actually think the scene is no imagination... but that he's still blind at that time. Otherwise he would have looked up to her face, wouldn't he? (She's standing a little bit higher.)

I think the interwining scenes of sculpting and making love are to indicate that they, ehm, took their time... and to indicate the importance of that moments for the two characters: creating art and finding love (not only physical).
It ends with his glasses on... But if you take a look at how Laura has her hair, you can see it changes three times: bound together, loose and together again at the end. I don't think this is a mistake... but for the same reason.

In the beginning of the movie you see his girlfriend leave. You also get the picture he's not interested in her. When he is at the sea with Costa you can see what - I think - he has on his mind: his lost love... (this is before he meets Laura).
When Sarah reads his book, she reads that he tells he still loves his first love... Actually he tells her that himself as well.
I think Paul's crush for Sarah when she was young is then transferred to Laura... so he actually has a crush.
But I don't know if this 'crush' is like what you would expect: maybe it's a crush for the essence of beauty, not for a person... and does his crush not extend to wanting to 'have' a woman/girl, but in creating a statue...

One of the great things of this movie is that it can have so many explanations...

reply

At first I thought it was about that, but the ending doesn't fit the idea of reuniting with a past love. This is why upon subsequent viewings, I think his real interest is in capturing the essence of the past by making a scultpture instead of just making love to the young woman. Sarah confuses Paul's fascination as a come-on to her young daughter. At the same time, Sarah is also surprised to find Paul again after a long time and wouldn't mind exploring the idea of an affair with him. This is why, despite the fact she doesn't want Paul and Laura near each other, she agrees to take a set of photographs for him so that he may create a sculpture and keep Paul around for herself. Laura confuses his attraction to her as an actual come-on as well, and is frustrated by her mother's attempts (albeit, weak) at keeping her away from Paul (monologue says, "It's my turn"). It's more of a rivalry thing between mother and daughter. Paul seems unaware or nonchalant of what is happening. Meanwhile, we get the idea that he isn't getting along with his current girlfriend, but I'm trying to remember what she said to him when they were preparing the showroom. I think she said something about going back to NY, etc, etc. Their dialogue didn't seem like they were falling out or anything. You have to see how they interact at the party, too.

It's a very sparse plot. Like I said before, this movie is less about content and more about demonstrating David Hamilton's style in moving-picture format.


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

Yes you could be right!

That would certainly explain my first two questions.

Maybe the images in the water are not what he has on his mind, but are to indicate he can't find new inspiration, or create somehting beautiful again (other then the statue he already created from Sarah).

But that leaves the question why she was lying in his bed at the end...
Maybe after posing she went there herself?

It could also be that the explanation isn't valid and that she 'took the place' of the earlier girlfriend. Hmmm, your explanations starts to sound valid now. Any ideas of the ending in the bed then?

About the plot: that's what I like so much about the movie. It's just like when you see a beautifull painting: you can imagine the story for yourself and are - as a viewer - left with a lot of freedom.
So it is in the movie. He just sets some waypoints (with a lot of hints) and lets you decide yourself... and meanwhile he does this beautifully. You can stop it at any time and you will see a perfect 'picture'...

reply

[deleted]

Another thing came to my mind.
At the party you hear the girlfriend ask him to go with her.
He declines. Then there is the fire... and he looses sight.
Isn't it strange then that his girfriend - if they didn't break up - doesn't stay around? He's quite alone after that... (besides Costa and Laura's visits)

reply

Hmmm. Interesting. I need to check that part of the movie again.


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

At the afterparty, we see Costa carrying two candles and Paul's girlfriend takes one. She places it on the table and sees Paul. She goes and holds him and tells him she's been overreacting lately. Then, she tells Paul she'll be going away to New York, to which he says, "I'll miss you." She told him that she's getting worried that he's preferring his statues over her. The scene then cuts to the candle falling over and Paul immediately rushing to put the fire out; as he does this, we see the reflection of the girlfriend looking on apathetically and then walking away.

It's a strange scene. I'd have never thought she'd set the place on fire, but as for not having her around when he's at the hospital: He hardly had visitors, except for Laura, Sarah and her husband. Costa drove him back to his studio, but Paul tells him that he wants to be left alone, that he won't need his services anymore (it pisses Costa off 'cause Paul wasn't the least bit thankful). So, the feeling we get here is that he's very aloof and nonchalant of what goes on around him.

At the beginning of the film, he's looking over famous sketches and prints and asks, "What was Michelangelo doing when he was 41?" It seems a bit conceited he'd compare himself with a master painter of all time, but he goes on to state that his heart is not in it anymore. He's having problems coming up with inspiration to create a new work. At the beach (which is one of the best scenes in the movie; the cinematography and score are simply enchanting), he sees this figure rise from the bright ocean waters and, suddenly, he finds his muse.

If you were to go on thinking for the rest of the movie that Paul is only interested in creating a new piece of art, you'll notice that the film takes on a slightly different tone. There is still a bit of ambiguity about what happened at the end. If they didn't have sex and his only interest was in finishing the statue, then Laura's look of disappointment fits that idea. If they had become intimate and Paul remains aloof as usual, then that fits the fact that Laura was disappointed as well. After all, when the statue was finished, they did hold each other as lovers do... and then the scene cuts to her sleeping in his bed, nude, and him smoking a cigarette outside (a symbol of having just had sex). Still, the intertwining of the love scene with the making of the sculpture lends itself to the idea that it's all in the girl's head.


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

Yes fully agree with you.

Both ways are sad endings though...
I hoped someone could come up with a positive ending.

===

Btw: when he's looking at the sketches, the original French version doen't have text!

About the figure rising from the water: I always thought that that was Sarah..

===

Another question.
Have you any idea how this sync. version can have the extra scene? Was it in the original movie as well? Must have been... But why is it not in the French version then?

reply

The figure rising from the water was one, if not the best scene in the film. I wish I had that score! The silhouette rises, the bright water shimmers, and the score kicks in with these windchimes. It is beautiful. Even if you were not to like this movie, you must admit this scene was well-composed.

The entire score was minimal, yet possessed that old Eurodisco of the late 70s and early 80s sound to it (I suppose some might recognise such kind of music as "Italodisco" as well).


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

I rediscovered this movie recently after seeing it the first time when I was 18 and home from college for Christmas break. Back then (pre-Internet and before the large video chains took over the world), I used to visit a small local video store where the owner's wife would recommend some unusual stuff, because I told her that I'd like to see some good small movies as well as the big releases. She steered me to "Laura," although she probably figured I would like it because I would fall in love with the actress who played Laura. (She was right.)

Anyway, I wanted to weigh in on the "did they or didn't they" question. It's a valid point that perhaps their lovemaking was Laura's fantasy. But I figure that they did, and maybe those lovemaking scenes are cut into the scenes of making of the statue because David Hamilton and the editor were trying to show how much the process of making a statue was like making love for Paul. Either that, or Hamilton was just trying to give us something interesting visually, since the whole movie is about visuals more than plot or dialogue.

Part of the reason I think they did have sex is that after Laura says that the statue is finished, he goes into her arms, and it appears they're ready to commit to making love. They're in about the same places as he was when she takes off his glasses a little bit earlier. So I figure the sex took place after he finished the statue, and that the scenes were cut together. Some of the editing is a little rough, anyway, because there's one point when they're in bed, she raises up with her hair loose and then in the next instant, her hair is back in the ponytail.

As for what Laura is thinking when she leaves, that's a mystery to me. She doesn't seem disappointed or angry or anything. Her expression seems more blank. If there is a hint of disappointment in her face, maybe it's because she wanted Paul to come demand that Laura not be shipped off to boarding school. And when he remains in the water, she gives up on the idea of staying with him and walks off.

I'd love to see the French version, although it appears most of the dialogue is spoken in English. The whole thing seems dubbed, but the dubbing matches the mouth movements of the three American leads (Paul, Laura and Sarah). Also, I'd love to see this in full screen. While the plot is thin and the dialogue not the greatest, the movie is stunning visually. I'd prefer to see it like Hamilton wanted it seen.

reply

After reading this thread, it made me go back and review the ending. Originally, I thought that Paul and Laura made love. I have several reasons for thinking this way.

First, I thought it interesting that Sarah and Laura hug in front of Paul's open bedroom windows. They both look in before hugging and it almost made me feel that something had happened and Sarah was comforting her. If you notice, it seems like Sarah is craddeling her head. This led me to believe that some sexual act had occured. Or, after reading this thread, it could be that nothing happened and they were both grateful?

Second, I thought it interesting that Paul regains his sight after his time with Laura. I almost took it as if the gift of her innocence cured him. If anyone is familiar with the film "Valerie and Her Week of Wonders," there is a similar scene. After Valerie and her friend that is stricken with vampirisim sleep together (whether innocently or sexually), the friend is cured. She believes that Valerie's purity saved her. I almost felt this was the same with Paul. However, it could also be that finishing the statue was the cure?

There are so many ways to take this film. I suppose whatever works for the viewer is the best answer. I will say that Sarah's final look at Paul seems like one of quiet sadness. I get the impression that she wants to say something to him but holds back.

reply

[deleted]

I have seen it in theatre, and it is astonishing (you can't imagine how beach scene appears to be...).

Now, back to topic. I don't have second thoughts about making love. I see no reason to think it was only imagination. But (I'll answer to some earlier posters too) Paul was interested in her as a model, there was not much love on his side. He is an artist, it is the way he sees the world around himself, and everything around him is a part of his art - why he is doing it, who is he doing it for, what and who is the source... His girlfriend understood it so she left. Sarah has experienced it long ago, and now she understands what's in Laura's mind, so she can comfort her. Her relation with Laura was protecting her (knowing Paul), but there was a competition as well, as some posters noticed.

Overlaping scenes of making love and making sculpure are both real, of course not made in the same time (therefore time is of no interest, so we see Laura in different situations including her hair), and it is irrelevant which one happens first, they are so strongly bound. Without making love Paul wouldn't finish the statue, this was the final feeling and experience he needed to incorporate in Laura-statue, and without making statue there would be no making love because it connected them, Laura-girl was as proud and impressed to become a model, a Laura-statue as she was interested in Paul as a person or a lover. (And also, girls have always - wittingly or by intuition successful in manipulations, so we mustn't ignore using her own body to abet Paul to intercede in boarding school discussion. Yet, she didn't realize that his work is his top priority, and finding it out was probably the cause of her disappointment.) I think this editing was not rough at all, it was among the best things in the movie.

reply

Dude, this is just cos DH is a very bad filmmaker and/or writer. This is NOT at ALL what his films are about, they're about showing off the 13-18 year old female in all it's glory.

This is as useless as asking why James Bond survives all those bullets .......



Condoms cause SEX like roofs cause it to RAIN

reply

I don't get what you folks are thinking.

I first saw this film 20 years ago when I was 17. Then and now I can't help but feel a sexual tension between Paul and Costa (kind of like Costa is in love with Paul). But I never got the feeling that Paul is a romantic person. Throughout the whole film he comes off as someone that is way too into himself and is extremely selfish (he treats Costa like dirt and Costa looks up to him). I think he uses women and treats them like statues. He basically sleeps with women for I am not sure what reason (he doesn't seem to be sexually attracted to them, only artistically) and he does not seem to have the capability to relate to them, much less love them.

reply

That's an interesting perspective about Costa. I agree that Paul is too full of himself and his art; he's out of touch when it comes to personal relationships.


Do The Mussolini! Headkick!

reply

... this doesn't fly. If they were not intimate, why would she be nude in his bed? We know he felt her nude body all over while making the sculpture, and we see the finished sculpture during the scenes you admit are real (after her mother finds her, she gets dressed and they enter his studio), and we see him doing followed by the sex scene, with nothing to indicate a transition from actual to fantasy. Moresoever, the sex scene is more explicit that a young virgin would likely be able to conjure up in her head, including her clenching her teeth in momentary pain at the instant she loses her virginity. Why would she include that in the fantasy? Also, consider who directed and wrote the film, and there is no reason not to believe that Paul actually had intercourse with Laura. She probably looks disappointed because of some feelings of regret (after the fact) over having had sex at such a young age, or perhaps feeling that Paul used her (which is somewhat unfair since the sex only happened because she freely chose to go to him - no visit, no sex.)

reply

Before addressing your questions I must state that Paul and Laura do HAVE SEX. This is unquestionable. They have sex AFTER he completes the statue, but the intercutting of the sex scene with the sculpting scene confuses low-IQ reviewers who don't understand flash-cut or montage editing. The technique is used to compress time by showing scenes occuring in different chronological periods within the same sequence of viewing time. Like intercutting scenes of a boxing match with the aftermath of injured fighters being treated by doctors.

Now, to answer you.

At the end PAUL IS STILL BLIND! He sees neither Laura nor Sarah. He took off the glasses to indicate that he NO LONGER FEELS BLIND because he has learned to "SEE" with his sense of touch. He has a new way "looking" at life. Laura realizes this when she sees him splashing in the fountain and grudgingly accepts that she is no longer his muse and departs.

reply

Is it intercut, even? Yes, he's show touching her nude body during the sculpting sequence, but given that he is blind we would expect that - even if he had no sexual interest in the girl at all, all he's got to finish the sculpture is his sense of touch. Only after he completes the sculpture does the sex scene per se begin, with him lowering her to the floor. So what we see is actually in chronological order, as far as I can tell. That he sexually desires her is pretty well established throughout the film - his interest clearly goes beyond wanting to sculpt her. She is also clearly infatuated with him, and the fact that she never make the slightest attempt to resist what he is doing during the sex scene - no struggles, no cries of "stop" or "wait" - suggests that this is neither a surprise nor unwanted. I think she was perfectly aware that he would have intercourse with her if she went to see him, and wanted it to happen.

reply

I think this is the interpretation I agree with most - that they did have sex after the sculpture was completed, and that he doesn't actually regain his vision. I'm not going to say those are 100%, and I can see the other interpretations being valid. But this most comports with how I saw it, particularly on the first question.

reply