I like this movie a lot. Because I like David Hamilton's work. Whatever that "makes me" in somebody else's eyes, I could not give a hoot about.
But let's get real - as a "moving" (as in motion) version of a David Hamilton book, it's pretty good. As a motion picture (as in movie) it's one of the most laughably overblown, inane, amateurish pieces of crap ever filmed.
Make sure you read my first sentence again.
But these "dissertations" I'm seeing on it here - puh-lease, people. Dawn Dunlap (and the other girls in it) were/are hot. It's OK to say that. That's why he made the thing in the first place. And it's why it's a good movie.
And somebody really oughta do something about fixing the link to the wrong James Mitchell on the front page. (Though I'd be willing to bet, from a resume standpoint, the James Mitchell that *was* in the movie ain't trumpeting the fact at every chance he gets...)
Sorry you feel that way; I think "Laura" is a beautiful, and very classy film. What don't you respect about it? The cinematography is stunning; every frame can be cut out and framed to hang on the wall. The mother/daughter rivalry is handled very subtly, and quite believably. The Patrick juvet soundtrack is one of the finest, and most unforgettable scores i have ever heard, and the film is truly erotic, while not containing that much nudity, and only 1 sex scene. There is much character development, and all relations are explored. Even the sets and the wardrobe people can be praised for their exquisite work. Tell me, does a film automatically become less respectable because there happens to be some nudity? I love this film; i find it to be a very accurate portrayal of first romantic awakenings, and of obssesive, self-absorbed artists who tend to treat human beings as objects and forget to consider their emotions. "Laura" is like a shadowy, nostalgic dream caught on film, and for this quality, I believe this to be a truly fine work of cinematic art. On a side note, i have seen the French language version, and it is vastly superior to the English dub that most people are familiar with. I admit that the english version is a bit harder to take seriously, but see this in French, it is very good.
i think western people struggle with foreign films because we have a different view on things.
for example, the movie babycakes starring rikki lake is a German film that ends much more sadly than the american counterpart. western films need to end in a happy little package with resolution.
Europeans, in general, tend to be a bit less hung up on nudity and sexuality. i find this film gorgeous because it fascinated me as a kid. as an adult, i find it a beautifully filmed piece of art. its stunning and subtle and simply moving.
Keeper of Josef's sarcastic wit, tar pits, suits & "It is so On!"
Yes, i also saw this for the first time, at age 15, on late night cable. Up until that point in my life i had only seen hollywood films. "Laura" was my first "foreign" film, and it served as an introduction to the thousands of arthouse films that i have been collecting for years. I believe this film even changed my oipinions about sex as an adult. for instance I dont like porn films, I just find them depressing and completely unerotic. The fact that a film can change a person so much is proof of the power of cinema IMO.
"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics...'
I was drawn to this film by the presence of Maud Adams, a beautiful woman who should have become a superstar.
"Laura" really is a beautiful film that captures a "feeling" more than most recent movies I have seen. The cinematography is absolutely striking, and the soundtrack by Patrick Juvet is top-notch — though occasionally out of sync with the emotions on the screen.
I don't think I liked it quite as much as you did, however, mainly because I found Dawn Dunlap's performance very awkward and that plot twist about the blinding of the artist manipulative and poorly handled. Still, as a study in atmosphere, this film is unforgettable. 7/10 stars from me.