6.9 - The Jerk (1979) Discussion

[–] Anymorepie 15 years ago

People who don't know sh*t from shinola.

reply

[–] selmer_freak 14 years ago

yeah this deserves WAY more than 6.9...

reply

[–] linusb_89 12 years ago

I rated it 1 just to keep the rating down. It deserves something between 4 and 6. Who could seriously look beyond Martins *beep* acting? It's impossible to focus on anything else. Sure, it had some fun moments, but not enought to give it higher than a 6.

reply

[–] varengo71 12 years ago

If you think it's a 6, you should rate it a 6, dick! Don't try to skew the ratings to fit what you feel it should be! What a pompous thing to do!

reply

[–] NotASpeckOfCereal 12 years ago

Exactly.

But the joke could very well be on him. A lot of the time, the first thing metrics people do is throw out the 1s and 10s, then run a algorithm on the remainder.

Be sure to proof your posts to see if you any words out

reply

[–] TarkusLV 12 years ago

At one time I'd have rated it an 8 or a 9, but I just watched it again the other day for the first time in quite awhile, and I didn't feel it held up very well. I rated it a 6, but that was a bit generous, with extra points for nostalgia.

YAAAAAY! Now you go, lady!

reply

[–] Clyburn 12 years ago

The rating seems about right to me. It's broad dopey humor. A lot of people like that but it's a little on the simple side for a lot of people too.

I rated it 5 but 6.9 does not surprise me as an overall number.

reply

[–] bcdc1984 11 years ago

I always thought 6.9 was a good thing that is ruined by a period.

reply

[–] franzkabuki 11 years ago

It`s not "low", it`s appropriate.

"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply