After Lydia disappears with Wickham, both Elizabeth and Darcy express some form of regret/responsibility for something they did not say/tell.
Austen writes this when Elizabeth talks to Darcy just after she reads the letters,
When I consider," she added in a yet more agitated voice, "that I might have prevented it! I, who knew what he was. Had I but explained some part of it only—some part of what I learnt, to my own family! Had his character been known, this could not have happened. But it is all—all too late now.
Later Elizabeth laments to Mr Darcy,
When my eyes were opened to his real character—Oh! had I known what I ought, what I dared to do! But I knew not—I was afraid of doing too much. Wretched, wretched mistake!
What do you think she is talking about? When Austen has her say,
Had I but explained some part of it only—some part of what I learnt
What is the "it" she was referring to?
Then, in a letter from Elizabeth's aunt, Austen has the aunt write about Darcy's feelings,
He generously imputed the whole to his mistaken pride, and confessed that he had before thought it beneath him to lay his private actions open to the world. His character was to speak for itself. He called it, therefore, his duty to step forward, and endeavour to remedy an evil which had been brought on by himself.
What do you think Austen meant when he referred to "his private actions" that he now feels responsible for NOT laying open to the world?
Please note that I'm not asking WHETHER you believe anything either could have said or done would make a difference. While that might be something to discuss, it is irrelevant to what I'm trying to ask. Austen DOES have both express some sort of regret, some sort of responsibility for something the didn't say/tell. What is she talking about?
reply share
She's saying that she knew what kind of person Wickham really was, but she never said anything to her parents or anyone else, except Jane. Check out chapter 40 of the book:
There is one point on which I want your advice. I want to be told whether I ought, or ought not, to make our acquaintance in general understand Wickham's character.''
Miss Bennet paused a little and then replied, ``Surely there can be no occasion for exposing him so dreadfully. What is your own opinion?''
``That it ought not to be attempted. Mr. Darcy has not authorised me to make his communication public. On the contrary, every particular relative to his sister was meant to be kept as much as possible to myself; and if I endeavour to undeceive people as to the rest of his conduct, who will believe me? The general prejudice against Mr. Darcy is so violent, that it would be the death of half the good people in Meryton to attempt to place him in an amiable light. I am not equal to it. Wickham will soon be gone; and therefore it will not signify to anybody here, what he really is. Sometime hence it will be all found out, and then we may laugh at their stupidity in not knowing it before. At present I will say nothing about it.''
``You are quite right. To have his errors made public might ruin him for ever. He is now perhaps sorry for what he has done, and anxious to re-establish a character. We must not make him desperate.''
Thank you. Your posts indicate you have a very good understanding of various JA novels so I appreciate your input. My question wasn't clear enough. What SPECIFIC info was Austen intending us to imagine the had in mind.
I'll say what I think. I think they both believed the only info that could have emphasized Wickham's character and would have made any difference at all was his attempted elopement of Miss Darcy for money. That defines his attitude toward women, and IMHO makes him dangerous. I believe that is what she had in mind when she laments she made a wretched mistake for not saying more...and I imagine she might have meant to her father when he was deciding to allow Lydia to go to Brighton. I believe this based on two things. One, that was what Darcy felt he needed to tell Elizabeth when he was trying to convince her in the letter. It is also based on what you quoted. Elizabeth tells Jane that the only thing that would make folks believe Wickham was really wicked was the news of Miss Darcy.
But as an aside and tangential to my question generally polling for opinions, what do you make of this: "Sometime hence it will be all found out, and then we may laugh at their stupidity in not knowing it before." What is Austen having her say? Certainly not that the new of the attempted elopement will be found out and then we'll have a big laugh. I truly find some of Austen says, to put it mildly, confusing.
I think Elizabeth is saying that the clues were all there, but she didn't see them -- most likely because she didn't want to. Remember, she made excuses for Wickham when he got himself engaged to Mary King, even though it was pretty obvious he only wanted Miss King for her money.
And it wasn't only Elizabeth who didn't want to see the clues -- the rest of Meryton also liked him because he was charming and handsome and looked good in his red coat. Nobody in town liked Darcy so, given the choice between Darcy and Wickham, everyone chose Wickham.
Last but not least, I also think Elizabeth is being more than a little sarcastic.
I love this passage in Chapter 41. The regiment is about to depart for Brighton, and the officers have been invited to dine at Longbourn. Elizabeth sees Wickham for the last time and decides to have a bit of fun with him at his expense. She tells him that she saw Darcy and Colonel Fitzwilliam at Rosings.
Wickham: "How long did you say that he was at Rosings?"
"Nearly three weeks."
"And you saw [Colonel Fitzwilliam] frequently?"
"Yes, almost every day."
"His manners are very different from his cousin's."
"Yes, very different. But I think Mr. Darcy improves on acquaintance."
"Indeed!" cried Wickham with a look which did not escape her. "And pray may I ask -- ?! but checking himself, he added in a gayer tone, "Is it in address that he improves? Has he deigned to add ought of civility to his ordinary style? for I dare not hope," he continued in a lower and more serious tone, "that he is improved in essentials."
"Oh, no!" said Elizabeth. "In essentials, I believe, he is very much what he ever was."
While she spoke, Wickham looked as if scarcely knowing whether to rejoice over her words, or to distrust their meaning. There was a something in her countenance which made him listen with an apprehensive and anxious attention, while she added,
"When I said that he improved on acquaintance, I did not mean that either his mind or manners were in a state of improvement, but that from knowing him better, his disposition was better understood."
Wickham's alarm now appeared in a heightened complexion and agitated look; for a few minutes he was silent; till, shaking off his embarrassment, he turned to her again, and said in the gentlest of accents,
"You, who so well know my feelings towards Mr. Darcy, will readily comprehend how sincerely I must rejoice that he is wise enough to assume even the appearance of what is right. His pride, in that direction, may be of service, if not to himself, to many others, for it must deter him from such foul misconduct as I have suffered by. I only fear that the sort of cautiousness, to which you, I imagine, have been alluding, is merely adopted on his visits to his aunt, of whose good opinion and judgment he stands much in awe. His fear of her has always operated, I know, when they were together; and a good deal is to be imputed to his wish of forwarding the match with Miss De Bourgh, which I am certain he has very much at heart."
Elizabeth could not repress a smile at this, but she answered only by a slight inclination of the head.
That passage is such a giggle. Austen tells us that "there was a mixture of sweetness and archness in [Elizabeth's] manner which made it difficult for her to affront anybody", and here we have Lizzie at her most sweetly arch (or archly sweet?). Could she be talking about Darcy, or about Wickham himself?! Wickham's discomfiture is a joy to read.
Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
Yes we do. Lizzy recalls that he did, in her thoughts that follow after she finishes reading Darcy's letter:
[Elizabeth] remembered also, that till the Netherfield family had quitted the country, [Wickham] had told his story to no one but herself; but that after their removal, it had been every where discussed; that he had then no reserves, no scruples in sinking Mr. Darcy's character, though he had assured her that respect for the father would always prevent his exposing the son (ch. 36). http://www.mollands.net/etexts/prideandprejudice/pnp36.html