I caught the sequel half way through on TV. And I was wondering why the hell he was with Halsey-Taylor in the sequel. I mean, she clearly screwed him over and used him for money in the first one. And in "Any Which Way You Can" all of a sudden, he forgets all her wrong-doings? Messed up.
"I caught the sequel half way through on TV. And I was wondering why the hell he was with Halsey-Taylor in the sequel. I mean, she clearly screwed him over and used him for money in the first one. And in "Any Which Way You Can" all of a sudden, he forgets all her wrong-doings? Messed up." ------------------
There's a couple of scenes at the beginning of "Any Which Way You Can" that shows Clint is still extremely upset and angry over what happened. It was dealt with, although I wouldn't have forgiven the b**ch!
In ANY WHICH WAY YOU CAN, the screenplay immediately addresses Philo's anger with Lynn over what she did in the first film. They make it clear in the sequel that Philo has not forgotten what Lynn did to him.
Another way of looking at it is that Halsey-Taylor was in the sequel because Clint was still dating Sondra Locke then. I'm sure that had far more weight than any plot reasons.
Another way of looking at it is that Halsey-Taylor was in the sequel because Clint was still dating Sondra Locke then. I'm sure that had far more weight than any plot reasons.
This is the best answer. Close the thread.
And who knows, really, but imagine how much better this film would have been without Locke's crappy acting. Everyone else does a great job in their roles.
reply share
Towards teh beginning of teh sequel, Philo is in a bar where she is performing. She spots him & sits down to talk to him. She explains that her brother (I think) was behind the scamming & that he was a control freak. I guess that's supposed to mean that she always liked Philo but couldn't have a relationship due to the brother's ways. So next thing you know, they are a couple!
are you #$#@$@ kidding me or what?!? These movies are Clint Eastwood's "good ole boy" answers to Burt Reynolds' Smokey and the Bandit series. Both are dimwitted, escapist cr@P.
...and you are going to pick apart a minor plot "flaw"!?! No one questions him hanging out with a monkey/o-tang who tears apart cars and punches out random strangers (right turn Clyde), but re-uniting with Sondra Locke strains the film's credibility?!!
The whole point of this film was he wanted this chick. Then he finds out it was all a sham. She was a terrible person. I agree it was purely for personal reasons, not any adherence to the film's logic that she returned in part 2.
The first film ends it great, she didn't love him, and he got to throw her scum life back in her face. The beginning of the second film tried to act like that's not how it ended, as if she simply broke his heart but somehow loved him, which is total crap.
Beverly D'Angelo had more right to be in the sequel, her character was a good and adventurous person, still a bit of a wild card. Not a hustler and hooker.