MovieChat Forums > Soldaat van Oranje (1979) Discussion > Questions about Soldier of Orange --SPO...

Questions about Soldier of Orange --SPOILERS**


I watched the film on DVD last night for the first time and thought it was one of the finest films I have seen in a long, long time. Especially since I did not have much knowledge of the Dutch involvement with WWII. I would prefer to watch a war film like this rather that Saving Private Ryan any day.

Questions:

1. At the beginning we are told that Vand der Zanden is the traitor, and yet when Eric meets him the dialog establishes that this is not necessarily the case.

2. What was written in the one line note by Queen Wilhelmina? I could not quite make it out.

3. If Robbie was indeed the traitor, what was his motivation? His girlfriend?

4. Would reading the book answer these questions? I think I would need to view the film more than once to truly understand all the subtleties I don't believe that I am thick headed; I think that there was a lot going on in this film -different subplots, etc. that were not exactly clear.

reply

Question 3-Robbie was forced to co-operate with the Germans as they threatened to send his girlfriend to a concentration camp-I can`t remember the exact dialogue but it was remarked she was "jewish looking".To be honest i`ve never really understood who the traitor was.Rutger Hauer hears from another prisoner tapping on the wall that Vand der Zanden is the traitor & when he finally gets to England tries to kill him.The prisoner may have believed this or been "got at" but it seems the Germans wanted him out the way & hoped Rutger would do the dirty for them.One slight flaw is the Germans would need him to escape to England & he only does this with a lot of luck.There does seem to be a longer Dutch version which may explain things-I`ll watch the film again & have a go at the others-a

reply

[deleted]

1. Van der Zanden isn't the traiter, Jan is told he is, then given a chance to meet up with a known accomplice [Erik] who is then released. Van der Zanden specifically explains this after the initial altercation. Erik believes him [correctly] based upon Van der Zandens' actions (he didn't try to kill Erik, he has a much higher position than Erik initially imagined, he allows Erik to make his claims/repeats Eriks claims in front of everyone, etc), and the clear validity behind his reasoning on why Erik believed the initial claim.

2. Something along the lines of 'I want you to be in London with me'.

3. Yes. She was Jewish, and they threatened to send her to a Polish concentration camp. Again, this was explicitly stated numerous times. And there is no "if" about Robbie. He was the traiter. He was shown in the car with a German officer, he was shown pretending to shoot Germans - then lying to his friends saying the Germans were dead - in order to lead the others into a trap, he was shown getting presents from Germans, his wife/fiance was given false papers by the Germans, he was released after being found out spying by the Germans, etc etc etc. Quite frankly I'm astonished that you would think it was at all in doubt. Half the film is based upon the fact that we KNOW he's the traiter.

4. Watching the movie will answer these questions.

reply

lgron000, don't be so astonished that someone caught the subtlety of betraying identitie(s).

You're wrong that anyone should doubt. You're partially right that half the film is based upon the fact the we know that Robbie is "the traitor." But I use "a," and not "the."

The ambiguity that I picked up was in the beginning when the Dutchmen were trying to rendezvous with the English pontoon plane. It was intimated that someone betrayed them and that's why the Germans arrived at the same time in their boat.

Robbie did not betray them because it was later in the film that the German woman who had the tracking device finds Robbie. The Gestapo types put Robbie in a car and threaten to send Esther off to Poland. Robbie was genuinely surprised and frightened.

So up to that point, we don't know who sold them down the river (no pun intended) when they were trying to get on the plane. It is entirely possible that there was no earlier "traitor." A plausible explanation that is hinted at is that the Germans simply intercepted Robbie's radio messages since they do so later. He was an amateur who did not understand complex crytography.

Don't assume.

reply

On October 14, 1940 at the lake (called the Tjeukemeer) they were "betrayed" by a local farmer's wife (she saw the men carrying a heavy suitcase and was convinced it contained dynamite to blow up her eel traps!). She therefore called the Dutch police, who informed (!) the infamous German SD ("Sicherheits Dienst"). The people arrested were Jean Mesritz ("Jan" in the movie; he died on March 31, 1945 in the Nazi concentrationcamp Neuengamme), Hans Hers (1917-2006; who survived the war after almost 5 years in Nazi concentrationcamps), Lodo van Hamel (the first Dutch agent; he was shot by the Germans on June 16, 1941), Marion Smit (Lodo's girlfriend) and Professor Becking. Marion and the professor were acquitted.
Pasdeloup ("Robbie" in the movie) had nothing to do with it.

reply

Actually the movie is "only" based on the novel "Soldier of Orange" by Erik Hazelhoff Roelfzema.

"Erik" is Erik Hazelhoff Roelfzema RMWO (Militairy Order of William I; highest militairy order in the Netherlands), now living in Hawaii.

"Gus" is Jonkheer (Esquire) Ernst W. de Jonge (former president of the Leiden student fraternity "Minerva" and who was killed in a concentrationcamp).

"Alex" is Aad Robertson, who got killed in Russia.

"Robbie" is a guy called Pasdeloup, who regrettably had to be killed because he was a threat to the underground. He turned bad "to protect" his Jewish girlfriend.

""Van der Zanden" is Francois van 't Sant, chief intelligence officer during WWII and former chief of police of The Hague before the war. Certain elements tried to blaim him for some project going terribly wrong (which were actually part of the infamous "Englandspiel"). Even in 1980 Erik Hazelhoff went on Dutch national television to clear his name.

"Jan" is Jean Mesritz, who was killed in a concentrationcamp.

Furthermore the guys on the "St.Cerque" were actually Peter Tazelaar RMWO (who died a few years ago) and Bob van der Stok (highest decorated Dutch military ever, writer of the book "Warpilot of Orange"; he became a doctor in the US after the war; he died in 1993). "Gus" was never on the "St.Cerque".


By the way: Queen Wilhelmina writes "We achten Uwe overkomst naar Londen gewenscht" (old fashioned Dutch), which means "We consider your presence in London to be of the utmost importance".



reply