MovieChat Forums > Rollercoaster (1977) Discussion > Why Didn't They Offer This To Brian DePa...

Why Didn't They Offer This To Brian DePalma, Or Somebody?


There must be a reason this first-rate scenario -- along with a first-rate cast -- wound up in the hands of a James Goldstone, whose directing skills were flaccid to say the least. At every turn I could envision this in the hands of an early DePalma, who would then have been coasting on the success of "Carrie" and might have brought dazzling pyrotechnical skill to a high-tension cliffhanger like this.

It reminds me of John Avildsen's "The Formula": ambitious story, high-powered cast, strong musical score. That film, too, was a waste of great potential. The studio was obviously counting on the material so good it basically directs itself, like Day of the Jackal.

That said, this IS worth watching, and Bottoms is distinctively creepy as a domestic terrorist.



There, daddy, do I get a gold star?

reply

Goldstone didnt do too bad here. A great film noirish quality. Someone said about Columbo. Ayup.

reply

Well, at least there´s nothing distractingly awful about Goldstone´s direction, unremarkable as it may be. And there are even a couple of pretty impressive instances, like that crane shot during one of the rollercoaster rides, where the camera suddenly glides away and downwards from the high track, as if running off rails, only return to the track with a graceful little looping movement. That´s almost Altman´esque stuff right there.



"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan

reply

[deleted]