James's character


He is obviously one of the two most complex characters in the film(along with Gary-Berenger).I mean,he actually represents the daily part of Theresa's life in work,family and society but Brooks does not hesitate to stain his clean cut image with facts like his obsession with a person,his attitude of twisting reality by telling dirty stories about his family and deny them after a second and even, a person with outbursts not far from the type of street punks like Tony which Teresa hung around with(remember this blood and gut scene just before Theresa's last scene with her father.In the previous scene,James looks horrible and almost unbalanced while immediately after,Mr.Dunn shouts at his daughter for hurting this wonderful person.
Maybe someone who has read Rossner's book could tell about the meaning of the scene where he narrates that horrible story about his parents and laughs about it afterwards.He got Theresa spooked like ''wow,another weird character i my hands'' and then she came back to night life.I haven't been able to read the book yet,but I know that Brooks took essential liberties in his adaptation of it.
Anyway,he is a very puzzling character and a proof that this film after 40 years still gives food for thought.

reply

Just watched this movie for the first time and given that I knew that someone kills Diane Keaton's character in the end, I thought it would be James who did it as he was obsessive, dishonest and creepy. James was an enigmatic character. I guess we'll just have to read the book to get more insight.

reply

James is not like that in the book. He is good in a "white bread" sort of way, with a very choir boy type of persona. He's a virgin who has been saving himself for marriage, and lives with his mother (who requires a wheelchair and live-in assistance.) I think in the book he's a lawyer (?)

Theresa finds his patience and devotion inhibiting, and she has trouble relating to him. At the same time, she comes to trust him more than she has other men.

He finally gives her an ultimatum that she marry him, or he will move on.


.

reply

I didn't really understand Brooks' reasoning for making James a psycho. I preferred him as the man who fell for Theresa (or wanted to love her) and challenged her.

Making him a stalker seemed unnecessary since Tony was also stalking her.

reply

I think Brooks wanted to show that there are dark sides to even those who are "good" on the surface.

reply

I agree with Huggo.
▫▪⚫⚪

reply