MovieChat Forums > Three's Company (1977) Discussion > Did Mr. Furley also think Jack was gay?

Did Mr. Furley also think Jack was gay?


Like Mr. Roper did?

reply

Yes.

reply

He never seemed to make mention of it like Roper constantly did.

reply

He liked to tease Jack about it but Furley was never nasty about it like Roper

reply

I found Furley nastier.

And yes, Furley was always making comments about Jack being gay, and even tried to cure him more than once.

reply

Neither one was particularly progressive (it being the 70s-80s and all) but Roper seemed to have a nasty edge to his remarks. Furley came off like he was telling lame jokes, though he did get hostile in his own way if Jack got too close.

reply

He never seemed to make mention of it like Roper constantly did.


It was written more in the early seasons because the premise was new to the series and it was a running joke. Furley certainly did make fun of Jack, maybe not every episode, but when Furley came on, the running joke was running a little stale. I don't think either Roper or Furley were homophobic. They both came to admire Jack and Furley even considered him a surrogate son. During the Ropers' last appearance during season 5 (the season after The Ropers was cancelled), Roper sought out Jack advice.

reply

I think that Roper told Furley that Jack was gay. I seem to remember a scene when Roper sold the building and he told Jack that he told the new owner he was gay.

Either way, why did Jack have to go on pretending with the new owner?

reply

I think that Roper told Furley that Jack was gay. I seem to remember a scene when Roper sold the building and he told Jack that he told the new owner he was gay.

Either way, why did Jack have to go on pretending with the new owner?


Yes, in Roper's last episode, he said he told the new owner Jack was gay. And in Furley's first episode, he said that Roper told him or his brother Jack was gay.

The new owner was Furley's brother and Furley explained that his brother wouldn't allow an unmarried man living with two girls, so Jack had to keep up the charade.

reply

The new owner was Furley's brother and Furley explained that his brother wouldn't allow an unmarried man living with two girls, so Jack had to keep up the charade.
That's what makes no sense about the situation with the trio and Mr. Furley on this issue.

On a number of occasions, Mr. Furley comments that he couldn't have a heterosexual man living with two girls in the apartment building because, "My brother Bart would never allow it!".

But the question is, how would Bart even know about it unless Mr. Furley told him?

Bart owned the building and handled the business, but there's no evidence that he even ever visited the property. There's no way that he would be familiar with the personal circumstances of every single one of he building's tenants.

If Mr. Furley actually had no moral or personal objections to unmarried heterosexual men and women living together (and it's hard to imagine that he would, given that he fancied himself a "swinging bachelor" and all of that), he could have just told told the trio, "Listen kids, I'M cool with this kind of thing...but my brother Bart isn't. So, if he ever comes around and asks any questions, just tell him Jack is gay...He'll never know the difference!".

reply

Well Furley was also known to be a blabber mouth, so he likely would have spilled the beans, unintentionally, to his brother at SOME point, so maybe they just did not want to risk it.

ALSO I was never sure about the Furley/Bart situation.

I always got the impression Bart was the actual LANDLORD, so to speak, and Furley was just kinda the super, or "fix-it man" if something broke and maybe Bart allowed him to live there for free.

reply

I always got the impression Bart was the actual LANDLORD, so to speak, and Furley was just kinda the super, or "fix-it man" if something broke and maybe Bart allowed him to live there for free.


Bart owned the building but Ralph was the building manager. It was his job to collect the rent, lease apartments, and make repairs. As such, he was paid to do. As with most apartment manager jobs, they're rent can be free or at a reduced rate. I think Furley lived there for free, but he still got a regular paycheck from Bart.

Bart's operation was more organized than Roper's. Bart was a businessman who had an office downtown. Furley had to collect and report the rent every month to Bart's office. In one episode, Bart sent an efficiency expert to the building to cut costs. Although Bart appeared in one episode (at his office), he was never seen onscreen visiting the apartment. The apartment was just one of many buildings/business that Bart owned.

reply

That's what makes no sense about the situation with the trio and Mr. Furley on this issue.

On a number of occasions, Mr. Furley comments that he couldn't have a heterosexual man living with two girls in the apartment building because, "My brother Bart would never allow it!".

But the question is, how would Bart even know about it unless Mr. Furley told him?


It does make sense. In several of Furley's early episodes, he was extremely fearful and paranoid of Bart. He always thought that Bart had spies in the building who were reporting his doings to Bart. Thus, if Furley did something that went against Bart's wishes and Bart found out about it, Furley would be out of a job and a residence.

reply

Yes. In Don Knotts first appearance, it was mentioned that Roper told Furley off-screen.

reply