Having seen 'What Did You Do In The War, Daddy?' I have to regretfully pretty much agree with denham's assessment.
The script at times seems like a first draft of an amateur agitprop play of the 1970s (yes, THAT bad). It's repetitive, "on the nose" and very disjointed. There is little opportunity for real drama because the characters are 2D representations of simplistic ideas rather than believable people. In those circumstances it isn't surprising that some of the performances are awkward because actors have to play the subtext and there just isn't any.
I'm not unsympathetic to some of the ideas in there but they were so crudely expressed and the bitter clumsiness of the whole piece would have been such an anticlimax after the rest of this superb series that I can understand the BBC not showing it so as not to devalue what had gone before.
If you can take the disappointment, I would say that it is an interesting watch; partly to see how the makers thought the characters would have evolved over time, but also as an object lesson in how many people who had consistently produced such great work before (and many of them also worked on the brilliant Colditz) were capable of getting things so badly wrong.
reply
share