SNL had a wider appeal as it parodied things found in pop culture. It was grittier and certainly more "adult." Even as a kid, it was cool to watch SNL even though it's something your parents were doing.
SCTV had more intellectual humor. The parodies were of television itself, and literature, like The Grapes of Wrath, or Dante's Inferno, etc. The humor was quite good, but to get into SCTV required above average intelligence, and/or an appreciation for that kind of humor. If you'd never read (or seen the movie) Grapes of Wrath, why would you find that funny? Especially when SNL was doing a parodies of things like Jaws, which was a blockbuster seen by everyone.
The actors on both shows (at the time) were all graduates of the Second City School of Comedy, and the only "crossovers" came in the form of films like Ghostbusters which included members of both casts. Later, Martin Short would be the one to have a character on both. Just a side note, the animated film Heavy Metal was voiced by much of the SCTV cast.
I was always a fan of both, and I wouldn't say SCTV was rejected by viewers, it just appealed to a smaller segment of the TV market of its time.
- Frank
reply
share