Let's say she became pregnant and expected delivery in early March. All she would need to do then is announce her news and, when asked the due date, say "late April or early May". Nature would then take its course, the baby would arrive in March and so be considered "premature", like Valentine and as per her wish.
I think she wanted her baby to actually
be premature this time around - George doubted Valentine for so long because he didn't have the tell-tale signs, ie no hair or fingernails. Plus, she was going to try lying about the dates again, but a fainting fit gave the game away.
And I was saddened by her death, too - yes, she lacked Demelza's warmth of character, but Elizabeth's strength was in her loyalty. She sided with George over Ross (well, that and her own personal enmity after that night in May), and then Osborne Whitworth, because George was her husband, but when she felt strongly enough - usually on a matter involving her children - she was tough enough to stand her ground (which George respected her all the more for). I actually pitied them both when she died, because everything was finally coming together - Ursula's early birth convinced George that Valentine was his, and he seemed to fall in love with mother and daughter both. With that last seed of doubt removed, Elizabeth would have been loved and protected by her husband - they may even have had a more equal relationship, albeit based on a lie. I haven't read beyond
The Angry Tide yet, but I'm assuming that, without Elizabeth, George only gets worse!
"Tony, if you talk that rubbish, I shall be forced to punch your head" - Lord Tony's Wife, Orczy
reply
share