Though it's never explained, there is one interesting idea planted along the way. The only child whose name we learn is the litte girl who is so interested in the woman's pregnancy. She says her name is "Lourdes," which brings to mind the famous accounts of children who reported seeing apparitions of the Virgin Mary at Lourdes, France. Just the whole idea of a supernatural visitation exclusive to children seems similar to this story. I don't think it was the filmmakers' intention here that the kids just decided to murder everyone. The one girl's father relates how it all began suddenly late one night. I'd be curious to hear what others think about this.
I wondered what kind of link the movie was trying to estabilish between the footage of atrocities suffered by children during wars and the events on the island. My only guess is that the force that is controlling the kids could be seen as some sort of enraged entity, a vindictive, cleansing collective mind that has decided that enough is enough and has selected adults in general as the category on which to blame all the atrocities that innocent children have to bear. Your observation on the girl's name subtly evoking the apparition of Virgin Mary to children could just be right.
My idea behind the news footage was that we're supposed to feel sympathy for the children as they are innocent creatures. To provide the completely opposite view of what the kids on the island were. So that their evil would be that much more of a shock. That was also reinforced by the people who kept saying: Who Can Kill A Child.
But I could be wrong ofcourse.
Did you ever notice that people who believe in creationism look really un-evolved? - Bill Hicks
I'm just now watching this and it seems like there is a psychic link between the kids so maybe an alien entity saw what was happening to children on Earth and 'suggested' they kill the adults first. Even though this wasn't the best movie I've ever seen I couldn't stop watching it. Someone recommedned it to me and I'm glad they did. I can see where the whole 'Village of the Damed' and 'Children of the Corn' thing got popular.
The opening scenes are supposed to be showing how adults are often the *enemy* to children: by starting wars, torture, starvation. And that the children are now getting their revenge. I heard this on the film's commentary. The director says he just wished he had put it at the END of the film, so viewers could maybe understand the film better.
But even with the 'revenge' idea, it doesn't explain WHO or what made the children go beserk/evil and kill the adults. In the commentary, its mentioned that the book (written after the screenplay was written, I believe) says that 'a yellow powder fell over a village before all this happened.' But the director (?) didn't seem to like this idea. But if we consider the yellow powder version, who or what dropped the powder on the village?! The government? Aliens? Nazis? It seemed unlikely that human adults would have done it, after all, who wants a huge horde of killer children running amok? But then, humans were never too bright with their experiments were they?
One curious thing was that the children were able to 'recruit' more children seemingly by staring at them, and by touching the woman's pregnant stomach...implying something supernatural or extraterrestrial was at work there.
"I'd say this cloud is Cumulo Nimbus." "Didn't he discover America?" "Penfold, shush."
I also think that using the war footage as an opening is a choice that's way outside the norm. That was actual war footage of real events, which, even if the movie does come off at some points as slightly low-budgeted or even cheesy at times, really sets the tone for the viewer to understand why these powerless children should rise up like a military force and essentially begin a revolution on this island. Using that footage sets a completely serious feeling on the viewer that the story they're about to hear is trying to make a point. Without the opening sequence, I think this comes off much more as a low-budget B-movie style of a film that could easily be lost in the shuffle with mainstream horror films of a similar (kids killing adults was also pretty original at the time) genre. I absolutely loved this film, but I really strongly believe that the opening provides justification for the characters which you can at least identify with. It's an incredibly unique and overwhelmingly bold way to open a horror film. I don't think I've seen anyone even attempt to open a film in a similar way.
ridiculously, the german film distributor answers the question by giving the film the title TÖDLICHE BEFEHLE AUS DEM ALL which means in english: LETHAL COMMANDS FROM SPACE :D
I always thought there was something in the water of the island that caused the kids to snap and kill their parents. Perhaps some chemical that only affected children. The woman drank a lot of water during the movie and then her baby killed her. I connected that event to her drinking the water for some odd reason.
I really liked the footage at the beginning of the movie because it shows how cruel the world really is. As adults, it is our job to love, nurture, and protect children; but since so many children die from starvation, the effects of war, and several other causes on a daily basis, it shows that we failed in doing our job. I thought this movie made that point very well. It is possible that the children saw where adults failed in ruling this world, so they figured perhaps if they took control of the world away from adults, they could do a better job.
The girl called Lourdes who Evelyn met in the cafe touched her stomach and obviously transmitted her malignant will onto the unborn baby then. When Evelyn wakes up in great pain when she and Tom are trapped in the room, she explains that the girl had touched her and now the baby was killing her, as indeed it did.