Disappointing movie


Anyone think so?

reply

No. Next!

reply

No-I love it!:-)

reply

No way, it's in my Top 10 of all time. The script is my favorite of all time.

Shampoo needs to be seen at least twice before you can call it a "disappointment." The story is based upon Wycherly's "The Country Wife," which has been considered a classic for 400 years.

reply

Shampoo needs to be seen at least twice before you can call it a "disappointment."


Agreed. When I saw it the first time, at 19, it didn't hit me. On a second screening, Shampoo emerges as a truly funny and yet painful film, with humorously biting social commentary.

reply

Well i saw it only once so i guess i'll give it another chance.

reply

Its one of those slow moving films that you have to pay close attention to. This is on pithy movie.

reply

I agree that this movie is a bit of a letdown. Shampoo belongs to a time, a place and a generation that I at 26 have no connection to. Believe me, I wish I did. Having parents from this era, I love its art and culture, but this movie has no resonance today. I have seen it three or four times throughout my life and I always thought that I would like it more as I grew older, but I just don't feel it will ever be to me what it is to those who saw it when it came out. It is a great commentary on the times, but to have in the AFI's greatest comedies? I never thought to laugh through this whole movie. If I did, it feels like the rug would have been ripped from underneath it. Even though George is light hearted, it seems you are supposed to feel his tragic nature. And of all the write ups it gets, one thing is always overlooked: Jack Warden. That man steals the show in a film with more eye candy than todays CGI can offer. I mean, damn, Carrie Fisher looks like a cupcake on a school day. But...Jack Warden, amazing. I didn't dislike this movie. I just had the same problem with Hal Ashby's Being There. It was another movie that felt like its message was flat now. Peter Sellers is my favorite actor and I know that movie was his last mark on the world, but it just doesn't work anymore and hinges on nostalgia for a world gone by. That being said, I found Ashby's The Last Detail to be very relevent to today and love that movie very much. A lot is in the screenplay which for Shampoo's was poor (sorry Towne). The movie could have been shorter. It was too repititious, I knew that George was a cad in the first five mintues. There was no need to keep going over and over it again. I am rambling...

reply

Agreed. Disappointing.

My accountant says, "1 + 1, 40% of the time, equals divorce".

reply

What made me really appreciate Shampoo was seeing Coming Home. Both films are set in 1968, and they play off each other in interesting ways. In Coming Home, the characters are directly faced with the horror of the Vietnam War. In Shampoo, the characters are insulated from reality -- perfectly symbolized in a very brief bit, when Jack Warden's character drives through Beverly Hills in his Rolls Royce, and listens to the car radio. When a news report about Vietnam appears on the radio, Warden quickly changes the station to hear someone droning on about the stock market. Near the end, the Vietnam War makes a brief and unwelcome appearance -- a Marine shows up at the salon, to bring the sad news that the salon owner's son has died (not in battle, but in an accident on an American base). Rather than playing up the melodrama and pathos that most directors would wallow in to drive the point home, Ashby underplays the moment.

Also, the script is very well thought out. Every little detail connects. The way Beatty drives his motorcycle like a madman, not paying attention to road hazards or traffic conditions -- does this say something about his immaturity? This point is underscored when Beatty attempts to get a loan to open his own salon -- Beatty's character has no clue about how to deal with a "square" bank executive. Just these two small scenes tell us a great deal about his character, which is confirmed in the larger sweep of the film, as Beatty's character fumbles his way through his personal relationships.

The story structure is very clever -- coitus interruptus is used three times as dramatic turning points in the story. On a deep philosophical level, the film is saying that satisfaction is unattainable, despite the feverish machinations of the characters. There is also the conceit of emptiness amidst splendor, that these characters have lots of money and sex, and yet still feel empty. It is all an exercise in futility, and wisdom is gained at a steep price -- when it is too late. And yet, despite the bleak truth underlying the film, it is funnier than hell.

One touch I enjoyed -- George is in the dark (literally) at the beginning of the film, as he has sex with Felicia in a darkened bedroom. At the end of the film, George is in the harsh morning light, learning a hard life lesson.

reply

Brilliant and correct analysis, Fluffer.

reply

It serves him right.

reply

You make some good points for sure. It still feels a bit lightweight compared to Ashby's best though.

Badges? We don't need no stinking badges!

reply

I was graduating HS when this came out. It was pretty risque at the time. But I never saw the big deal about the movie. My main complaint was it's star Beatty who seemed to be over his head with the heavyweights in the cast. I just looked at it again and feel the same way, But now I see that he is suppose to be that hairdresser Jay Sebring who got murdered with Sharon Tate and Hawn was suppose to be Tate.. But it was a very underwhelming movie and the only people I really who liked it were some critics and Beatty fans. It is more celebrated now then it was then, IMO. Oh and I forgot how good the Beach Boys were until I saw this again.

reply

I would have to agree. I just saw this movie two nights ago and frankly didn't see why it is as revered as it is. While some of the satire is comical, the movie felt dated and I rarely laughed while watching it (and I like humor that is subtle as well as over-the-top). Frankly, I feel that perhaps it seemed great at the time because of the some of the more shocking moments such as when Beatty is being fellatioed and the woman's comment that she wanted to suck his c*ck. Today, this is not as original or unique as it once was. Frankly, I never really felt sympathy for Beatty's character. Overall, I was very disappointed and wondered why this movie was on AFI's top 100 funniest movies.

I do want to say that Harold and Maude (also directed by Ashby) is one of my favorite movies of all time.

reply

Those are the exact same problems i had with
"Shampoo".

reply

I would say it's lesser Ashby and Towne for sure, but Warren was terrific and there were a few yuks.

Badges? We don't need no stinking badges!

reply

Yes, but probably because I watched it with the expectation/assumption that I would like it. A satirical comedy-drama from the 1970s, written by the guy who wrote Chinatown, directed by the guy who directed Harold & Maude, and featuring an interesting cast of talented actors? Totally my kind of film, but it just didn't click with me.

reply