MovieChat Forums > Picnic at Hanging Rock (1979) Discussion > This is a film steeped in metaphor

This is a film steeped in metaphor


Yes the film is set around an unsolved mystery, but the film is more about the metaphors than anything else.

The whole concept is the clash between the wild, vast, untamed nature of the Australian landscape and the stifling British aristocratic mindset.

One of the most poignant images in the film can be largely skipped over. There is a shot where the beautiful light, fluffy cake that the girls have been eating for St Valentine's day is covered in ants, who are devouring what is left over. This is Australia, so far removed from Britain and aristocracy. It is wild and the landscape is indifferent to our wants and needs. It also takes what it wants and needs.

Similarly, we have the image of the garden party taking place on the rugged shoreline of a watering hole. The women in their big heavy dresses and the men in their heavy suits and big hats...yet you cut to the 'Aussie' sitting in his shack with a beer in his hand, a sensible hat (for the conditions) and his shirt open and breathing; far more suited to the landscape than this absurd British aristocratic garishness. He says "that's the difference between you and me...".

The images of the girls in their lace and heavy stockings lying at the base of the rock is at odds with the rugged, scorched landscape; they look out of place. Why would you cover your entire body in heavy fabrics, corsets and gloves when the landscape is so dry, rugged, hot and unforgiving?

You see the girls begin to strip off their stockings and walk in their bare feet as they climb the rock. You also see the girls start to lose their inhibitions and to embrace the environment around them; to become one with the wild, untamed nature of their environment. They fall asleep on the rock and the lizard moves past them without even a second glance, as if they are just part of the rock. The lizard cares nothing for them but merely continues on with his search for food and shelter. This land has not been conquered and goes on as it always has even with human contact.

The whole film is a metaphor for the stripping away of Victorian values/British culture and the embracing of the wild nature of the Australian landscape...the new world.

The film is set in 1900 because it signifies a new era, and the birth of a new century and a new country.

Australia was federated in 1901 and became a country rather than a group of separate colonies. This film is one giant metaphor for the movement of Australia away from British aristocracy, and the embracing of a completely different way of living and relating to the world around us.

Watch the film with these goggles on, and I promise it will make more sense.

As for what happened to the girls? It is of no consequence, they were absorbed by the landscape and would never be seen again. If they were dead? The animals would feast on their remains (just as the ants feasted on the remains of the cake), and life would go on, and the landscape would be completely indifferent to what had happened.

Hence the fact that the British gentleman almost kills himself trying to find the girls, but only finds a small square of fabric from one of the girl's dresses..the rest would never be found.

The whole point is that the landscape swallows them up, and all of their rituals and aristocratic ways mean nothing in that context. The girls probably weren't raped or attacked, they simply disappeared never to be seen again...absorbed by the landscape.

The line "if the cop...can't find them, then nobody can, and that's the stone cold end of it". He's right! That is the 'stone cold end of it"; they will never be found, and that is the nature of the world these people now inhabit; that is the nature of the Australian landscape.

The Australian landscape will just swallow you up, this is the reality of this new world. The same is true today, Australia still swallows people up, never to be seen again. It is still vast and untamed in many parts, and no matter how much Britain tried to tame Australia, it was never 'tamable', and thus a new culture was born.

It's a beautiful film and will always be one of my favorites, simply because of the poignant metaphors.

reply

WOW, great interpretation. I never saw the film that way, but what you say makes sense.

I'd like to add the film also deals with the sexual and emotional repression women at the time were forced through. They becoming hysterical and crazy because of it. Their suggestibility to raw nature and the landscape's hypnosis by Hanging Rock kind of coerced them to run away or die there.

Never let others dictate your opinion on a film:
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=13340299

reply

Absolutely! I love your interpretation!

To me the whole film is just stripping away all of the 'custom' of Britain and the embracing of a much more untamed and free existence.

You're so right, as the girls climb the rock and become more seduced by the wildness of it they start to lose their in-habitations, yet one girl can't let go of the "emotional repression women at the time were forced through" and we witness her "hysterical and crazy reaction" to this sexual freedom and autonomy.

I also love that Miss McCraw succumbs to the rock as well. Something Miss Appleyard simply can't accept as she is so firmly embedded in the stifling culture of the time. She speaks of Miss McCraw being raped (and as if she is disappointed in her for putting herself in that position), when it is entirely likely that she just succumbed to the rock and it's wild untamed nature, just as the girls did.

There's so much metaphor in this film, you need to watch it several times to catch it all.

reply

Which version did you watch?

I bought the three disc DVD and after watching both, I think I prefer the original, longer cut.

Never let others dictate your opinion on a film:
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=13340299

reply

I bought mine several years ago but it was a special addition with interviews with the cast and director (very enlightening commentary) - especially the stuff on Rachel Roberts.

I think the version I have is the original longer cut yes. And I agree that I prefer it.

reply

You're not the first one to see this movie as a symbolism of the contrast between the uptight Victorian mindset and the rugged Australian wilderness, or of how Australia would soon gain its independence from British rule.

And when I think about it, this story kind of reminds me of "The dreaming", a novel by Barbara Wood. It is about how a young British woman comes to Australia in the 1870s, because she wonders if her family has been cursed by a tribe of Aborigins. And even though her mystery is solved in the end (thank God), we still get plenty of thoughts about the differences between the two cultures and countries.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

Will have to check it out, thanks for sharing.

reply

And I can also recommend the rest of Barbara Wood's work. She has written many historical novels about many different cultures from all around the world.

Intelligence and purity.

reply

Will do :-)

reply

If you think the film is steeped in metaphor, I'd suggest reading the source material. Joan Lindsay's novel is an infinite puzzle and is hauntingly written. So, so, so good.

reply

I read it when I was very young, but I don't think I picked up on a lot of the themes. I think it's time for a re-visit. :-)

reply

Hence the fact that the British gentleman almost kills himself trying to find the girls, but only finds a small square of fabric from one of the girl's dresses..the rest would never be found.

But that's just it -- the rest (a girl) WAS found. And the sequence fits your interpretation even more perfectly.

The suffering Michael reaches out to Albert and in his hand is the scrap of eyelet lace. That electrifies Albert, who races back to the Rock and discovers Irma, cradling her unconscious body and saying, 'Jesus!' etc.

So the Englishman had the instinct and pointed the way... but the Australian man interpreted the clue correctly and achieved the actual rescue.


_____________

I don't come from hell. I came from the forest.

reply

Interesting interpretation.

It stand up too. The scene where the English gentleman is trying to enter the rock where the girls disappeared there is some kind of force preventing him from entering the rock. Another very strong metaphor for Australia's separation from Britain.

reply

The scene where the English gentleman is trying to enter the rock where the girls disappeared there is some kind of force preventing him from entering the rock. Another very strong metaphor for Australia's separation from Britain.


Ooooh yes, I like it.

_____________

I don't come from hell. I came from the forest.

reply

The scene where the English gentleman is trying to enter the rock where the girls disappeared there is some kind of force preventing him from entering the rock.


So we can assume the opening in the rock symbolizes the human vagina in Victorian times and the inability for the gentleman to enter the symbolic vagina symbolizes the sexual repression of that era.

I'm a real kewl kat.🐈

reply

English Colonialisation of Australia

The date of Picnic at Hanging Rock’s dramatic events is not accidental. St Valentine’s Day links to the aforementioned theme of budding sexuality. (It’s also the date of Lindsay’s wedding.) 1900 sets the events shortly before the foundation of the Federation of Australia, and therefore, with the country squarely under English rule. This ties directly into one of the most common readings of the film: that it represents, per Jim Tate, a “dramatic clash between the refinement of European culture and the uncouth power of the bush”.

That clash is represented through various dichotomies throughout the film: the contrast between civil Englishman Michael (Dominic Guard) and vulgar valet Albert (John Jarratt, in one of his earliest roles); or the conflict between the pompous Mrs Appleyard and the meek Sara, who, before her suicide, is strapped to a wall to “improve her posture”; and of course, there’s the juxtaposition between the lush, oh-so-English grounds of Appleyard College and the untamed wilderness that contains Hanging Rock, along with “venomous snakes and poisonous ants”.

rigid schedule of the school gives way to a space where watches inexplicably stop and time flows like thick syrup. A conversation in the buggy on the way suggests the underlying symbolism; when informed that the Hanging Rock is a million years old, a student reflects that it must have been “waiting here just for us”.

The inexplicable mysticism of the Hanging Rock represents more than simply an uncouth Australia, but the Australia before English settlement. An Australia belonging to its Indigenous inhabitants. Not an Australia “waiting” for the English Empire to claim it, but a rich country with its own culture and beliefs. A country with its own time and of its own time: the Dreamtime. The film begins, after all, with an Edgar Allan Poe poem about dreams read over a shot of Appleyard College, its elegant architecture and verdant yards portrayed as a foreign body in a natural landscape. The College – and by extension, the Commonwealth – is inherently unnatural, and the events that follow a natural consequence of its unwelcome invasion.
http://www.sbs.com.au/movies/article/2015/06/03/picnic-hanging-rock-cheat-sheet


☁☀☁

------__@
----_`\<,_
___(*)/ (*)____
» nec spe,nec metu •´¯`» Jean Seberg & Little Irene: http://i.imgbox.com/3ZH6KeBR.gif

reply

Yes, very true, and I appreciate the excerpt, but here's a line from Crocodile Dundee...and please don't completely dismiss it because of cultural cringe:


Michael J. "Crocodile" Dundee: "Well, you see, Aborigines don't own the land.They belong to it. It's like their mother. See those rocks? Been standing there for 600 million years. Still be there when you and I are gone. So arguing over who owns them is like two fleas arguing over who owns the dog they live on."


...Australians are so used to denigrating everything about our pop culture as subordinate to anything that came before, I think this quote from a film that Australians largely brush over is quite relevant.

...he's right! Those rocks were there well before human inhabitants...in fact they were probably there before we even established legs and walked out of the ocean, so arguing that the Aboriginal people of this land 'own' those rocks is absurd! It's absurd beyond absurd!

...yes! The Aboriginal people belong to those rocks, as that is the only culture they know, but they don't 'own' those rocks; 'ownership' is a human construct, and those rocks (as with the Earth generally), will do whatever the hell they want, no matter who declares ownership.

This film (Picnic), demonstrates succinctly how humans are so small in the scheme of things, and easily the Australian wilderness can swallow people up; only to be absorbed back into the landscape for something else to live.

...that is the only definite about humanity, that we die and go back to the Earth that gave us life so that something else may live.

reply

This is one of the coolest threads on here. Thanks for your insights.

reply

Glad you've enjoyed it! :-)

reply

The film is set in 1900 because it signifies a new era, and the birth of a new century and a new country.


my own interpenetration is the transformation of a girl into a woman (see: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0073540/board/nest/205940044?d=205940044#205940044), but I can also see how the film can be about the girl's and the country's transformation into maturity.

------------------------------------------
Fire is my Champion

reply

Good review.

reply