cut version
Does anyone know where I can get the cut version of this, with no hardcore scenes? Cuz I SERIOUSLY don't want 2 see that. Well NEwayz thanx nd bye!
"Lost" fans, come here!
www.xanga.com/fanfix_4_us_all
Does anyone know where I can get the cut version of this, with no hardcore scenes? Cuz I SERIOUSLY don't want 2 see that. Well NEwayz thanx nd bye!
"Lost" fans, come here!
www.xanga.com/fanfix_4_us_all
[deleted]
im 13. ive seen the movie, but i had to skip through abt 45 mins of the movie, and i missed her training scenes. if it were my choice, i would actually rather even have the film w/o porn, altho im 13 and male. i mean.. it rilly doesnt need to be in there. it makes the film be known best for being pornographic or i dunno, i just think it would be better w/o it..
"Lost" fans, come here!
www.xanga.com/fanfix_4_us_all
It isn't pornographic. Porn is supposed to arouse, the stuff in here is there to shock and repulse the audience by emphasising the ordeal she has to go through. It isn't titillating in the slightest and it isn't suposed to be.
If it wasn't there would there really be any sufficient justification for the revenge she seeks? Regardless of whether it was cut, and we had to use our imaginations to consider the fact that being forced in to prostitution and had to do this stuff.
I think it's all the better for being in there. The only problem is that some people don't think the pay off isn't suitable enough. Though I think it is, it is pretty brutal especially that close up of the pimp getting shot twice in the leg. You had to feel for him, he seemed like a nice pimp to me :)
I'm 13 too, and I just fast-forward those scenes. I'd RATHER watch the film without the HardCore sex, but then it would be cencorship, so I just bought it fully uncut and just dont really watch those parts.
shareYou CAN get the film on dvd without the porn inserts. The cover of the dvd is yellow if you want the film without them whereas the red one includes everything. You can buy it at the official synapse site - it is scheduled to come out on the 30th August 2005. Check out this link - http://www.synapse-films.com/shopping_cart/thriller_2.htm. Hope that helps!
shareWhy do you want the film cut!!!!!!???? Thats stupid. 13s shouldnt be watchin it. Ha ha
I'm just killing time on planet earth....that must be why im here... NuTbAg
Agree with scuba steve. The hardcore scenes are hardly pornographic, they are shot like a bad biology video at school.
shareSo are all these folks who want to see this without the sex scenes American? This is an exploitation movie. You have people getting shot, an eye getting stabbed, rapes, beatings, basically a whole lot of violence, and folks don't have a problem with that, but throw in a little copulation and everyone gets offended.
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
Although I haven't seen this film in either incarnation, I am of the understanding that these 'porn' scenes are spliced into the film (i.e. they don't 'belong') and that it is extremely obvious as such. In my opinion, this probably looks lame.
I think the insertion of the porn stuff was likely just an attempt to get 'street cred' for the flick. Porn was a big deal in 1970s pop culture, with films like 'Debbie Does Dallas' and 'Deepthroat' getting national attention.
Since this type of self-pimping for popularity is very uncool in my eyes, I would prefer to seek out the "Vengence Edition" with the original cut of the film, where the pacing isn't so screwed up. The porn could have been an interesting 'deleted scene' feature for the DVD, but (and again, I am just going on the info I've read) it's just stupid when included in the film.
Some of you are going to blast me for assessing this before seeing the movie, but come on.
Do you all see every film that comes your way?
Or do you make viewing choices based on what you believe you will enjoy?
... thought so :)
----------
And that's the kind of day it is here in the mind of... FRIGHTFAN!
I am of the understanding that these 'porn' scenes are spliced into the film (i.e. they don't 'belong') and that it is extremely obvious as such.
Since this type of self-pimping for popularity is very uncool in my eyes,
I would prefer to seek out the "Vengence Edition" with the original cut of the film, where the pacing isn't so screwed up.
The porn could have been an interesting 'deleted scene' feature for the DVD
Do you all see every film that comes your way?
Or do you make viewing choices based on what you believe you will enjoy?
... people getting shot, an eye getting stabbed, rapes, beatings... throw in a little copulation and everyone gets offended.
You bring up an interesting irony there, mvario :)
It makes no sense, but there it is.
[deleted]
Well, mvario, you've (quite handily) convinced me of two things here. Number one, you've convinced me that this film's integrity (such as it is, lol) is best kept by distribution of the the 'hardcore edition' and should only be viewed as such. Number two, you've convinced me to avoid seeing this film. I don't really like exploitation films much anyway. I don't know what got me interested in discussing this film frankly. LOL.
Thanks for the info, and it was good talking to you.
----------
And that's the kind of day it is here in the mind of... FRIGHTFAN!
I'm glad to see that you respect the integrity of film, not just this one. Too many folks these days are quick to support the butchering of a movie it it doesn't meet their standards.
And if you don't like exploitation flicks then you probably won't like this. In a lot of ways it's just another rape/revenge flick not unlike I Spit on your Grave, except it has some action scenes (and I use the term loosly), a car chase (and I use the term real loosly), and some hardcore (which we we've discussed) to spice things up.
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
... people getting shot, an eye getting stabbed, rapes, beatings... throw in a little copulation and everyone gets offended.
by - mvario on Mon Aug 29 2005 16:11:26
You bring up an interesting irony there, mvario :)
It makes no sense, but there it is.
----------
And that's the kind of day it is here in the mind of... FRIGHTFAN!
Oh man,,, that is one of the best quotes I've seen in awhile.
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism
Man I wanna see this film, but those scenes do sound harsh. Sounds worse that some scenes in Irreversible.
shareThere's nothing in Thriller that's as disturbing as those two scenes in Irreversible.
The Eye Gouging is pretty shocking but other than that theatrically it's not disturbing. For examples the rapes and beatings are not too realistic because of poor acting. To me what made the rape so bad in Irreversible is the beating she took afterwards. I really think he could've left that part out.
But really I like Thriller but it's not that disturbing.
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism
Thank you. The current attitudes in this country (the US) with the new Puritinism have me pretty perplexed sometimes. There's this great desire for screen violence and an equally great aversion towards screen sexuality. What the hell is happening here?
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
What's happening? Movies have always been about fantasy but now more than ever american audiences are thriving on fantasy way more than reality.
The problem is this, Violence is easy to glamorize in movies and America has perfected it. American audiences love this kind of portrayal of violence because it shows a lot of action without the psychological impact. For example, when a renegade cop goes and kills 15 mobster, drug bosses with an automatic machine gun and then explodes the home of the main boss and then goes on a high speed chase after his son that crashes 20 cars along the way and then goes home and has passionate but mindless, choreographed sex with his female detective partner,it's seen as a fantasy that american audiences thrive over. Movies today are almost like a satire toward violence and sex. As long as you stick to this formula, everything is o.k.
But as soon as you show anything of a realistic value, it's deemed "GRAPHIC". People don't want or care to see what psychological impact violence has on a person. People don't want to see realistic sex scenes without slow motion editing and music in the background. Have you noticed how sound is edited during shooting scenes or sex scenes. You almost never hear anything other than loud music, explosions or loud moaning in the case of sex. Most people in america have seen millions of people get shot on television and movies but have no idea how a bullet "Sounds" when it enters a human body.
So what I'm saying is that it's not necessarily a division Between violence and sex in america but A division between reality and fantasy.
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism
To some extent I'll accept that, but I still think there is a much more pervasive attitude against portraying sex and nudity (which in this country is getting to be looked at as almost the same thing). You can have film that's all about "cartoonish" violence and get a PG-13, while nudity in a sex scene is an automatic R rating. And don't even get me started on the Janet Jackson superbowl thing where a bare breast brought about a national scandal and made the US the laughing stock of the civilized world. And am I the only one that noticed the irony of the fact that it occured in the middle of one of the most violent team sports? Look also at the national outrage raised with the whole Grand Theft Auto San Andreas fiasco. One of the most violent video games out there and it's no big deal, but as soon as it becomes known that there is some sex stuff in there it becomes a matter of debate for Congress.
You can also look at how films are rated by the MPAA now as opposed to 20-30 years ago. Film violence that used to earn an R-rating can pass today with a PG-13, and yet sex scenes tend to be rated much harsher these days.
While there is truth to what you say about "cartoonish" violence being more acceptable than brutal violence in film, there is still a very Puritanical and unhealthy view on sex that is on the rise in this country.
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
Don't get me wrong I'm not saying there isn't an unhealthy view of sex in America. But the whole theatrical portrayal of it involves too many other factors. Can you explain what you mean by Puritanical? I've heard that term being used alot but have never gotten around to finding out what it means?
On a side note, the ratings by the MPAA is more political than ever before. Pg-13 equals more money period . Producers, Directors and Studios do everything in their power to influence a PG-13 rating. Some have more power than others. The lowering of the ratings for violence has been a slow campaign in the movie industry for decades now and it's motivated by profits. Realistic portrayals of violence is still given a R (hince most war movies) and also ,of all things,bad language is a definite R rating, so it's not always sex.
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism
"Don't get me wrong I'm not saying there isn't an unhealthy view of sex in America."
And an even unhealthier view of nudity.
"Can you explain what you mean by Puritanical?"
Not, of course, in it's historical context, but what it has come to mean in common usage, " Rigorous in religious observance; marked by stern morality" "to oppose things such as alcohol and sexuality" and as a synonym for pruddish.
"n a side note, the ratings by the MPAA is more political than ever before. Pg-13 equals more money period . Producers, Directors and Studios do everything in their power to influence a PG-13 rating. Some have more power than others."
I agree. I think it's pretty common knowledge that the large studios can get away with more in a PG-13 film, and that the raters are easy on Speilberg.
"Realistic portrayals of violence is still given a R (hince most war movies) and also ,of all things,bad language is a definite R rating, so it's not always sex. "
Although bad language isn't always definite, if used only once:
"A film's single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, shall initially require the Rating Board to issue that film at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive must lead the Rating Board to issue a film an R rating, as must even one of these words used in a sexual context."
They are notoriously harsh on recreational drug use though.
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
Yeah you're right. Drug use is almost always given a R rating also.
Thanks for the explanation of Puritianical. Morality is another catch phrase that Repulicans have hung thehats on. I don't want to get into politics here but if this is what you mean then you are absolutely right.
America's view of morality is absolutely crazy right now and is breeding true predatory like behavior within our country. Seeing a nude anything is seen as bad but yet where the leading patrons of pornography and all things unethical. Drug and Sex Traffiking is sustained by our market. It is really strange when you think about it.
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism
When it comes to sex there is a major schizophrenic disorder in this country. Americans spend (according to a CBS news article) over $10 billion on adult entertainment, and yet everyone speaks out against it. That $10 billion isn't 10 rich guys spending a billion a piece. The hypocrisy in this country is astounding.
And nudity! It's like people in this country think that nudity is sex, they can't separate the two. The best, well worst really (and symbolically telling) was when Ashcroft had the nude statue of Justice covered up. America would vote to put trousers on Michelangelo's David given the chance.
And the hypocrisy covers drugs too. Back when I was young, this was like the late 70's, I remember a poll that said that something like 90% of the folks between 18 and 25 had at least tried marijuana. These folks now, my generation deny it and act like smoking a joint is like murder (or I guess now they would say it's "helping the terrorists")
-Mike
"Let's make some art!"
I agree 100%
Regan: What an excellent day for an exorcism