Does actually appear in the film.
He's right there in the film when he's introduced as Sir-Not-Appearing-In-This-Film.
Just saying.
And so, God came forth and proclaimed widescreen is the best.
Sony 16:9
Nothing makes much sense in this movie's world anyway. (If you have to say "just saying" then you're not. Do refrain from internet cliches in the future).
shareOh my God you found a plot hole... I can never watch this again :P
shareA plot hole is the equivalent of just a flesh wound.
--
Names is for tombstones, baby!
I wonder with his sharp eyes, the OP noticed no horses appeared in the film, though a rabbit did.🐭
shareTwo Rabbits.. although one was made of wood.
One horse DID appear in the movie. So you're wrong, unless you want to stick to technicalities, like 'but I used a plural'.
Anyway..
"Does actually appear in the film. He's right there in the film when he's introduced as Sir-Not-Appearing-In-This-Film."
Nope, a photo is not a human. A PHOTO of someone appearing in the film is NOT that someone himself appearing in the film.
Monty Python 1, you 0. Try again.
P.S. Just in case you want to argue, consider this:
I take your photo, put it in my movie, then I tell everyone that you appear in the film.
Do you tell people you actually appeared in the film, or do you correct people "no, it was just a photo of me that you see in the film, I never actually appeared in that film"?
The Pythons were sh!t hot on paradox.
"Everyone is ignorant, only on different subjects". Will Rogers (1879-1935)
I, too, am not appearing in this film...though mine is a more non-nuanced non-performance...
_______________________
What in the wide, wide world of sports is a-goin' on here?
The baby pictured was Michael Palin's infant son in real life.
"R.I.P. IMDb message boards." - Me, 2017