"Oh I see, so you were moronic enough to compare our government to Hitler, Stalin, Mao....hahahahaha."
No, not really. Go back and re-read what I actually wrote. Take your time; move your lips as you do. No one's watching. Then come back.
Or maybe it's not a reading comprehension problem as much as the feigned-reading-comprehension-problem,a favorite "liberals" (i.e., State-f@ckers) so that they can misrepresent what pro-freedom people have written and go for their stock-in-trade, the "straw man."
OK, I'll make it real simple--simple enough for the average Obama voter to understand. It's not comparison as much as recognizing different entities as being part of the same genus or species. (I can never remember which is which; I had the same problems with science that your average "liberal" has with eocnomics, history and logic.) Any state, however benign (and ours gets less and less so, especially under the reign of the Troika, Reid, Pelosi and "Il Dufe" is still The State. The Corleone family may be more violent and rapacious tnan the Lucchese family--or less-- but they're both the Mafia. Think you can digest that, Aristotle?
The social scientist I mentioned who did the estimate of the State's body count in the 20th Century pointed out, as I recall, that the bloodiest states of the most absolute ones. (Hitler, Stalin, etc.) The point being that the citizenry is the safest when the government is limited rather than absolute.
"I can assure you Hitler, Stalin and the like used their fair share of guns." Yes, they did. The modern State is based on the power of the gun. (Just as earlier ones were based on the power of the spear, the sword, etc.) And like most dictators, they wanted to have a monopoly on the guns. For that reason, once their gangs get in power, they want to disarm the populace.
."..For some reason conservatives like to think that liberals are in favor of Hitler."
Straw man. I'm not a conservative, but I'm probably more familiar with conservative writings than you are (in fact, I'd be surprised if you came out of your cocoon long enough to actually read conservatives writers), but could you show me any conservatives have actually said that?
Hitler eliminated a whole section of the population based on their race - I think this has better ties to American conservatives? He was a social conservative, much like the Christian Right of our country. I like how you believe that people in the liberal urban areas are stupid and illogical, when in fact cities like New York, Boston, San Francisco, Chicago, and Los Angeles have the best schools in the world.
"Hitler eliminated a whole section of the population based on their race - I think this has better ties to American conservatives?"
Staw man again. And again, you base this one what?
"He (Hitler) was a social conservative." Really? Could you give me some examples of his "social conservatism"? I'm not a social conservative, so the comparison is of purely academic interest to me, but somehow I missed the "social conservative" part of National Socialism. I do know that the Nazis were collectivists favoriing statist economics along with draconic gun-control. Who then would be more like a Nazi--your average social conservative, or you? Just wondering.
reply
share