How does the film compare the the book?

[deleted]

Personally though the film is ok, I think the book is much better.

i've read that the book is quite different in plot terms. The ending for example, along with the complete lack of the side plot of Marty Augustine. I'm sure it's an excellent read but according to wikipedia, a couple of high profile directors turned it down before Altman showed interest.

"gentlemen make your lives extraordinary"

They are completely different. The book was printed on paper and the movie was made on film stock.

The book was great, the movie absolute garbage. Can't believe I wasted the 2 hours.

Although TLG is a favorite picture of mine, Chandler's novel is superior. For those that have read the book, the casting of van Pallandt is absolutely mystifying.

The book is more satisfying from a storyline point of view although in film noir (or neo-noir), the plot line is not deemed as important as the emotions and psychology of the characters along with the mood the film communicates to the viewer.

Elliot Gould's portrayal of the iconic shamus is unusual but it works along with a huge assist from Sterling Haydn's Hemingwayesque performance all under the watchful eye of Altman.

It's shorter.

Perhaps the OP just wants to reach out for some sense of community.