Thank God Kubrick didn't direct this
Apparently he was interested in directing The Exorcist. Thank God that didn't happen, I find him insanely overrated. It would have been a bore with bad pacing and wooden acting.
shareApparently he was interested in directing The Exorcist. Thank God that didn't happen, I find him insanely overrated. It would have been a bore with bad pacing and wooden acting.
shareExorcist would have been ruined, just like Clockwork Orange. Fuck that idiot
shareWho's the idiot, a successful filmmaker or a frustrated message boards user on the internet?
shareKubrick
shareGlad that at least one person would think that.
shareMe plus the original poster are at least two. You sir, are an idiot.
shareNice! When we'll study your work in pretty much every courses about filmmaking and movies as a whole, get back to me.
Seriously though, I have no problem with the fact that people have different opinions, but hating on directors like Kubrick or Tarantino seems to be like a trend to look special and have a different opinion than most people rather than a legit criticism. I mean... I don't say that everyone must like Kubrick or Tarantino. But, I think people should still show some respect and consideration. Insulting revered filmmakers instead of respectfully giving your opinion simply look like an attempt to piss people off. It doesn't bring any civilized or constructive discussion.
I will take me for instance: I don't like Tim Burton. I enjoyed Beetlejuice and Ed Wood, but most of his movies just don't speak to me and it's simply not my style/cup of tea. However, I don't go on Internet to call him a "hack" or "awful director" because I know that he's objectively not a bad director. If so many people love his movies, there's obviously a good reason for it. So... why can't Kubrick's haters do the same?
I think what we have today is nearly perfect but I would be interested in the direction he'd take with it. I can't imagine it being better but I wonder what "notes" he would have hit differently.
shareRecently on The Shining board there was a discussion on whether the ghosts were objectively real or subjective hallucinations of the characters. Kubrick probably would have followed Blatty's book more closely which actually had Father Karras debating the scientific rationale behind Regan's case. He hesitates before ascribing a supernatural and spiritual cause to the proceedings. Friedkin's movie leaves no doubt: this girl is definitely possessed by a demon, and this isn't a form of acute mental illness. Kubrick would have been far less inclined to depict the possession as objective truth but rather a form of madness.
shareVey overrated.
But a major accomplishment is Kubrick made a movie where watching James Mason is unbearable.
He was offered the film and declined. I don't know that he was ever seriously considering it. Kubrick wouldn't have done The Shining if he had done this. Personally, I'm glad both The Shining and The Exorcist exist in their current forms... and no Kubrick isn't over-rated. That's ridiculous.
share^this^
If anything it's William Friedkin that's a tad overrated.
No he really is.
shareWell, I love The Exorcist as it is. Still, Kubrick was a brilliant filmmaker and his approach could had been interesting.
He was also supposed to make the adaptation of Perfume: Story of a Murderer after Eyes Wide Shut. As much as I absolutely love the movie as it is now, Kubrick's approach would had definitely been interesting.
Open the pod bay doors Satan. I'm sorry Father, I'm afraid I can't do that.
shareKubrick is pretty good, his strength is his visuals and attention to detail and serious approach. He really has a unique look to his movies due to the wide lens he likes to use and composition probably. That being said I can see how someone would find his style boring. Kubrick rarely has an appealing Character in his movies and they are often movies with a depressing conclusion so in short not much fun to watch casually.
share