MovieChat Forums > The Exorcist (1973) Discussion > Watched for the first time, wasn't impre...

Watched for the first time, wasn't impressed by an off-the-wall ending


So I have watched the film for the first time in my life, and I was expecting something much more disturbing, but that's a matter of perception/taste, so anyhow... The thing that disappointed me was the very sudden, very abrupt 'bodyjump' scene and the following suicide. It all was pretty clear, considering the entire scene lasts for like...5 seconds, but because of that absurd leght I wasn't really satisfied. It's just one of those things that happen too sudden and too fast, so you don't have the time to react appropriately.

Any thoughts on that? Did I misunderstand something? Is the scene supposed to be more significant and more effective?

reply

I thought it was a fantastic climax to the film. First time I ever saw the movie was in a theater (and I've seen it in theaters a number of times over the years)....it's much more effective on the big screen.

reply

OP, I don't get why you think the climax is off the wall. There was nothing more that Karras could do for Regan, or say to the demon. Once Merrin dies, the story cries out for a quick ending, which is supplied by Karras' successful inviting the demon to come into him and by his decision to commit "demonicide" by leaping out the window. It happens fast, but not too fast for the view to understand, especially in view of the changes in Karras' face (Dick Smith's makeup job on Jason Miller), which clearly signal his temporary possession, and then his throwing off the demon's power seconds before the window-jump.

How would you have scripted this scene?

reply


How would you have scripted this scene?


Definetely with a slower pace!
I just felt like there was some kind of rewrite/reshoot going on there, like that was supposed to take more time, either there was a different conclusion. The film takes its time, that's why it was all too sudden for me, how the scene played out, since the rest of the story had a different pace. I don't know the history of this film, I'll check if there WAS anything going on with the writing and shooting.

reply

I think the pace of the film was quite slow, actually, and perfect for the build-up and ending that came. It ran for just over two hours, and nothing much happened until over 30 minutes in that would cause alarm or even so much as a gasp.

In my opinion, if you watch the film as Friedkin intended (which was very close to the novel), you're pretty much ready for an ending at the point where it actually does end. The poor girl and mother (and everyone else) had gone through enough.

To be fair, and to put myself in your shoes, I can see where you may have been disappointed...perhaps if you were hoping for more of a fight with the demon or for her to get loose and go running up in through the house or something, whipping everyone's azz along the way. That's not how the novel was written, however, and most people (like myself) who think the original is a masterpiece, can find little to critique.

If the movie had been done today, come to think of it (and if they didn't follow the book), I bet Karras WOULD have taken off out of the room and chased everyone into a beat down. Poor Chris might have ended up taking another punch or two, with Regan ending up shooting him in the back (with a gun she got out of Chris's room) just before he strangles her mother to death. Yep, that would be modern day.

reply

I haven't read the book, so I can't compare it, but in the film, it makes sense to me to have the moment of demonic possession of Father Karas be fleeting. I think what the devil "wanted" was to drive the force of goodness and sancity, as embodied by the priest, to enter his body/mind so he could fight the battle on even turf, so to speak. The devil accepts the "dare" and enters the soul of Father Karas, bent on destroying the priest--starting with the first evil deed to murder R gan. For a brief moment, the devil has control and has won the battle--but the intristic goodness and devotion of Father Karas, wins out, repossessing his own soul. Father Karas would not be strong enough to hold off the devil for long. So in that fleeting moment that Karas (ie, Goodness and sanctity) has control, there is only one choice if the demon is to be defeated: self-sacrifice in the act of suicide, a metaphor for (or homage to) the original sacrifice of the Savior for humanity. In the ultimate test, divine goodness triumphs over evil. It would not make sense for the possession to last longer than seconds. Aside from the story calling for a speedy resolve, prolonged possession would have meant the murder of Regan. The filmmakers did not wish to go there. The story is far more powerful with Karas winning out over the devil, thereby saving Regan, as Christ saved humanity.

small disclaimer: these are not my beliefs; I'm saying all this purely as an interpretation of the film/the story.

reply

Good points all. Too many viewers labor under the misconception that "Father Karras committed suicide and therefore went to Hell"; or "The demon possessed Father Karras and killed him by making him jump out the window - so the demon won and Dennings', Merrin's and Karras' deaths were all victorious deeds of the demon".

You hit the nail on the head by seeing Karras' sacrifice for what it was - not suicide, but the kind of self-sacrifice that, say, a soldier performs when s/he jumps on a grenade to save the rest of his peers.

reply

I was watching the intro last night in Iraq, and I have a small question for you. Why didn't the other "priest?", who was a contemporary of Merrin's, have any reaction to the clock chime stopping on the wall? To me, that's akin to Burstyn's non-reaction to the planchette moving.

reply

The other guy is not a priest, he's a Muslim museum curator. I think he is so deep into his cataloguing that he simply doesn't notice that the clock has stopped.

As to Chris's reaction/non-reaction to the planchette, I'll have to rely on somebody who's memory is better than mine. To me the scene looks oddly edited or dubbed, but I can't say for sure.

reply

Karras' goal wasn't to commit suicide, it was to get out of Regan's room as quickly as possible (the demon was close to making him strangle Regan to death), with his own death as the most likely unfortunate consequence.

From the OP title, I thought that you were going to object to the quirky, almost comical ending of Lt. Kinderman and Father Dyer going to lunch together, which as I recall is only in the director's cut of the film. Some viewers didn't like having such a dark and heavy film end on such a lighthearted note, though I like it personally.

reply

From the OP title, I thought that you were going to object to the quirky, almost comical ending of Lt. Kinderman and Father Dyer going to lunch together, which as I recall is only in the director's cut of the film. Some viewers didn't like having such a dark and heavy film end on such a lighthearted note, though I like it personally.


I thought that was also out of place, since those two don't even know each other much. The aftermath of Regan's ordeal I also found lazily put together. She was subjected to physical torture, yet we just see faded spots on her face, with the assurance of her not remembering anything. I guess a vaginal trauma of pretty big proportions wasn't a big deal.

Weirdly enough I've seen the Legion first, ages ago, which I'm going to see again (skipping EII for obvious reasons), and I'm not sure how does this ending fit with the Karras thing in EIII.

reply

[deleted]

I thought that was also out of place, since those two don't even know each other much. The aftermath of Regan's ordeal I also found lazily put together. She was subjected to physical torture, yet we just see faded spots on her face, with the assurance of her not remembering anything. I guess a vaginal trauma of pretty big proportions wasn't a big deal.


Presumably we aren't witnessing the day after the exorcism, but rather a moment after quite some time has passed. That would have given Regan's face and the rest of her body some time to heal, as well as an opportunity for Kinderman and Father Dyer to first become acquainted.

reply

The planchette moved by itself, and it should've been obvious to Chris. Regan didn't do anything to the thing at that exact moment. That's how I saw it, at least.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]

Apparently different people interpreted the jump differently. I saw it as being like the story in the Bible, where Jesus cast an unclean spirit out of a person and it entered a herd of swine which then jumped to their deaths. (Always felt sorry for the owner.) I figured it was the demon who forced Father Karras to jump. But someone here is saying Father Karras deliberately jumped to get rid of the demon, so, open to interpretation. Does the book make it clear either way?

reply

Father Karras sacrificed himself. You can see the change in him when the Demon is in control and when it isn't. He had a brief moment there when he had the chance to jump and he did. The book is clearer. Blatty never liked the way the ending was done in the movie as it confused a lot of viewers.

reply

That wasn't clear to me and that's why I thought it was open to interpretation.

reply

"That wasn't clear to me and that's why I thought it was open to interpretation."

I thought the same for years. Like Blatty, I think the ending wasn't done very well as far as making it clear. Also, a lot of people (Me included) thought the Demon won in the end. It's pretty confusing but still a great ending I think.

reply

My question if anyone knows is, if the possessed person suddenly dies while possessed, does that in any way harm the demon? The demon in the Bible made the swine run into the sea and drown, but didn't the demon still exist to possess someone else? I think in Jewish tradition a dybbuk can move on to another victim. It can't necessarily be destroyed.

reply

I think like you said, the Demon just loses it's vessel when the body dies and then tries to inhabit another one if available.

reply

And it can obviously go thousands of years in between, as that artifact was ancient.

reply

Honestly, I don't think the Demon is Pazuzu. It's never named. Merrin doesn't mention it to Karras which would be very important info for Karras to know about. Merrin is the expert.

reply

Anyone who's from Gen Z and are desensitized because every movie released now is about Demons and the Paranormal aren't going to like he EXORCIST which is the movie that started it all and is not surprising given how story driven it is

reply

"given how story driven it is"

I think that's a big part of it. Most people aren't expecting a serious story in any given horror movie and most don't provide it. The Exorcist is that rare kind of serious horror movie with great writing and acting so even if the viewer doesn't find it scary they can still enjoy an interesting story.

reply

I will admit it is well made.

reply